Human Resource Management II: Training and Development, Performance Management, Job Evaluation, Compensation, Employee Benefits and Incentives, Managing Careers, and the New Trends in HRM

The second half of Unit II follows the employee after joining: how the organisation trains and develops, appraises and manages performance, prices jobs through job evaluation, pays through wages, benefits and incentive plans, and manages careers; and then what is changing in HRM. The incentive wage plans are worked through with numbers, because the Halsey and Rowan premiums are computed in the examination, and job evaluation is taught as the bridge between HRM and the wage theories and wage legislation of Unit VIII. The chapter closes with the changing environment and the emerging concepts — engagement, analytics, the gig workforce, flexibility, diversity and green HRM.

1. Training and development

Training is the systematic improvement of the knowledge and skills an employee needs for the present job; development is the growth of the whole person for future roles; education builds general understanding. The training process begins with training needs analysis at three levels (organisational, task or operational, and individual, the model of McGehee and Thayer, 1961), then designs the programme, delivers it and evaluates it. On-the-job methods include job instruction training (developed in the United States during the Second World War: prepare, present, try out, follow up), coaching, understudy, job rotation, apprenticeship (in India under the Apprentices Act 1961) and internship. Off-the-job methods include lectures, case studies (developed at Harvard), role play, business games and simulations, the in-basket exercise, programmed instruction, vestibule training (a replica of the shop floor set up away from it, used for machine operators and bank tellers), sensitivity or T-group training (from Kurt Lewin's work at the National Training Laboratories, Bethel, 1947) and e-learning.

Donald Kirkpatrick's four-level model (1959) is the standard framework for evaluating training: reaction (did participants like it?), learning (did they acquire the knowledge and skills?), behaviour (do they apply it on the job?) and results (did productivity, quality, safety or turnover change?). Jack Phillips later added a fifth level, return on investment. Hamblin's model (1974) has five levels ending in ultimate value.

2. Performance appraisal and performance management

Performance appraisal is the periodic evaluation of an employee's performance and potential; performance management is the continuous cycle of which appraisal is one step: planning performance (agreeing goals and standards), monitoring and coaching, reviewing and appraising, and rewarding and developing. Traditional methods are straight ranking, paired comparison (each employee compared with every other; n employees give n(n − 1)/2 pairs), forced distribution (fixed percentages in each category, the "bell curve" or "rank and yank"), graphic rating scales, checklists, the critical incident method (Flanagan, 1954), essays and field review. Modern methods are management by objectives (Drucker, 1954; developed by George Odiorne), behaviourally anchored rating scales (BARS, Smith and Kendall, 1963), behavioural observation scales, the assessment centre, 360-degree feedback (from superiors, peers, subordinates, customers and self) and the balanced scorecard (Kaplan and Norton, 1992).

Rating errorWhat happens
Halo effectOne good trait colours the rating of all others
Horn effectOne bad trait drags every rating down
Leniency and strictnessEveryone rated too high or too low
Central tendencyEveryone rated average, avoiding the extremes
RecencyRecent events outweigh the whole period
Similar-to-meHigher ratings for those who resemble the rater

3. Job evaluation and compensation management

Job evaluation is the systematic determination of the relative worth of jobs within an organisation, as the basis of an equitable wage structure; it rates the job, not the job-holder (that is appraisal). The non-quantitative (whole-job) methods are ranking (jobs arranged from highest to lowest) and grading or job classification (jobs slotted into pre-defined grades, as in government pay scales). The quantitative (factor) methods are the point-rating method (compensable factors such as skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions, each divided into degrees with points; the total points place the job) and the factor comparison method (devised by Eugene Benge in 1926), which ranks key jobs factor by factor and allots money values to each factor. The International Labour Organization's account of job evaluation stresses that it removes inequities but does not by itself fix the level of wages, which is settled by the labour market, bargaining and law.

Compensation management designs the whole reward package: base pay (wage or salary, often in Indian industry basic pay plus dearness allowance linked to the consumer price index), allowances (house rent, conveyance, shift, city compensatory), incentives, bonus, and benefits and services (provident fund, gratuity, pension, insurance, medical care, leave, canteen, housing, transport, education). Benefits are called fringe benefits because they began at the fringe of the wage, and many in India are statutory. Pay structures may be graded, broad-banded or skill- and competency-based; wage surveys fix the market rate, and the internal ladder comes from job evaluation. Cafeteria benefits let employees choose from a menu within a fixed cost.

4. Incentive plans

Incentive (payment-by-results) plans relate earnings to output. Individual plans based on time saved include the Halsey premium plan (F. A. Halsey, 1891), under which the worker is paid for the time taken at the guaranteed hourly rate plus a premium usually of 50 per cent of the time saved (the Weir system used a third); and the Rowan plan (James Rowan, 1901), under which the premium is the proportion of time saved to time allowed, applied to the time taken, so that the bonus rises at first and can never reach double the time wage. Plans based on output include Taylor's differential piece rate, Merrick's multiple piece rate (three rates, stepping up at 83 and at 100 per cent of standard output), Gantt's task-and-bonus plan, Emerson's efficiency plan (bonus from two-thirds of standard efficiency) and the Bedaux point plan. Group and organisation-wide plans include the Scanlon plan (Joseph Scanlon, 1930s, a labour-cost ratio with suggestion committees), the Rucker plan, Improshare, profit sharing, gain sharing and employee stock option plans.

S = standard (allowed) time, T = time taken, R = hourly rate
PlanEarnings formulaWorked case: standard 10 h, taken 8 h, rate ₹50/h
Time wageTime taken × rate8 × 50 = ₹400
Halsey (50%)T × R + 50% × (S − T) × R400 + 0.5 × 2 × 50 = ₹450
RowanT × R + [(S − T) ÷ S] × T × R400 + (2 ÷ 10) × 8 × 50 = ₹480
🧠 When Halsey and Rowan pay the same
With a 50 per cent Halsey premium, the two plans pay the same bonus when exactly half the standard time is saved; Rowan pays more when less than half is saved, and Halsey pays more when more than half is saved. That is why Rowan protects the employer against loose time standards.

5. Managing careers and the new trends in HRM

Career management is the joint effort of employee and organisation to plan and develop the employee's progression. Donald Super's career stages are growth, exploration, establishment, maintenance and decline (disengagement). Edgar Schein's career anchors — the self-perceived talents, motives and values a person will not give up — are technical/functional competence, general managerial competence, autonomy/independence, security/stability, entrepreneurial creativity, service or dedication to a cause, pure challenge, and lifestyle. Organisational tools include career paths and ladders, dual-career ladders (a technical ladder parallel to the managerial one), succession planning, mentoring, and career counselling. The career plateau is the point at which further promotion is unlikely; the "protean career" (Douglas Hall) is one managed by the individual rather than the organisation.

The environment of HRM has changed with liberalisation after 1991, globalisation, technology and a younger, more mobile and more female workforce, and with the labour codes of 2019–2020. The challenges are retaining talent, managing a multigenerational and diverse workforce, flexible and contract employment, the gig and platform economy, remote and hybrid work, the automation of routine jobs, and managing downsizing through voluntary retirement schemes. The emerging concepts are employee engagement (William Kahn, 1990: the harnessing of the self to the work role, physically, cognitively and emotionally), talent management, competency mapping, HR analytics and people analytics, e-HRM and HR information systems, employer branding, the HR business-partner model (Dave Ulrich, Human Resource Champions, 1997, with the roles of strategic partner, administrative expert, employee champion and change agent), work–life balance, flexi-time, diversity, equity and inclusion, and green HRM, which enlists HR practices in environmental goals.

Key takeaways

  • Training needs are analysed at organisational, task and individual levels; methods run from job instruction training, coaching and apprenticeship to vestibule, case, role play and T-group; Kirkpatrick evaluates reaction, learning, behaviour and results (Phillips adds ROI).
  • Appraisal methods: ranking, paired comparison n(n − 1)/2, forced distribution, rating scales, critical incidents, MBO, BARS, assessment centres, 360-degree and the balanced scorecard; errors: halo, horn, leniency, central tendency, recency, similar-to-me.
  • Job evaluation rates jobs, not people: ranking and grading (non-quantitative), point rating and factor comparison (Benge, 1926; quantitative).
  • Halsey pays T × R plus 50% of time saved × R; Rowan pays T × R plus (time saved ÷ standard time) × T × R; with S = 10, T = 8 and R = 50, Halsey gives ₹450 and Rowan ₹480. Group plans include Scanlon, Rucker, Improshare, profit and gain sharing and ESOPs.
  • Careers: Super's stages and Schein's eight anchors, dual ladders and succession planning; new trends: engagement (Kahn, 1990), analytics, Ulrich's four HR roles, the gig workforce, flexibility, diversity and green HRM.

Practice questions (10)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation, in order, are

    1. reaction, learning, behaviour, results
    2. needs, design, delivery, evaluation
    3. reaction, behaviour, learning, return on investment
    4. learning, reaction, results, behaviour
    Show answer

    Answer: A — reaction, learning, behaviour, results

    Kirkpatrick (1959) runs from reaction to learning, then behaviour on the job, then organisational results. Return on investment is Phillips's fifth level, and needs–design–delivery–evaluation is the training process, not the evaluation model.
  2. Training machine operators on equipment set up in a separate room that replicates the shop floor is

    1. vestibule training
    2. sensitivity training
    3. understudy
    4. job instruction training
    Show answer

    Answer: A — vestibule training

    Vestibule training reproduces the work setting away from production, so that mistakes cost nothing and output is not disturbed. Job instruction training and understudy happen on the job itself, and sensitivity training works on interpersonal awareness in T-groups.
  3. The factor comparison method of job evaluation was devised by

    1. Ernest McCormick
    2. Eugene Benge
    3. Joseph Scanlon
    4. F. A. Halsey
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Eugene Benge

    Eugene Benge developed factor comparison in 1926, ranking key jobs factor by factor and assigning money values. McCormick devised the Position Analysis Questionnaire, Halsey the premium wage plan and Scanlon the group gain-sharing plan.
  4. A rater who gives nearly every employee an "average" rating to avoid the extremes commits

    1. recency error
    2. leniency error
    3. central tendency error
    4. halo effect
    Show answer

    Answer: C — central tendency error

    Central tendency error bunches ratings in the middle of the scale. Leniency pushes them all high, the halo effect lets one trait colour all the others, and recency lets recent events outweigh the period. Forced distribution is one remedy for central tendency.
  5. Which of these are among Edgar Schein's career anchors? Select all that apply.

    1. Hygiene and maintenance
    2. Autonomy and independence
    3. Security and stability
    4. Pure challenge
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Autonomy and independence; C — Security and stability; D — Pure challenge

    Schein's eight anchors include autonomy, security, pure challenge, technical and managerial competence, entrepreneurial creativity, service and lifestyle. "Hygiene and maintenance" factors are Herzberg's term for job-context factors, not a career anchor.
  6. Assertion (A): Job evaluation determines the relative worth of jobs within the organisation. Reason (R): Job evaluation by itself fixes the level of wages an organisation pays.

    1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
    2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
    3. A is true, but R is false
    4. A is false, but R is true
    Show answer

    Answer: C — A is true, but R is false

    A is true: relative worth is exactly what job evaluation measures. R is false: job evaluation builds the internal ladder, but the money level of the ladder is set by wage surveys, the labour market, collective bargaining and minimum-wage law.
  7. Assertion (A): Under the Rowan plan the worker's bonus can never equal the wages for the time taken. Reason (R): Under the Rowan plan the bonus is the time wage multiplied by the ratio of time saved to standard time, and that ratio is always less than one.

    1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
    2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
    3. A is true, but R is false
    4. A is false, but R is true
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A

    Both are true and R explains A: bonus = (S − T) ÷ S × T × R, and because (S − T) ÷ S is below one for any positive time taken, the bonus is always less than the time wage T × R, so total earnings never reach double the time wage.
  8. A worker's standard time for a job is 12 hours; he finishes in 8 hours; the rate is ₹60 an hour. What are his total earnings under the Halsey plan with a 50 per cent premium, in rupees? Type the number.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 600

    Time wage = 8 × 60 = ₹480. Time saved = 4 hours; premium = 50% × 4 × 60 = ₹120. Total = 480 + 120 = ₹600. Under Rowan the bonus would be (4 ÷ 12) × 480 = ₹160, a total of ₹640, since less than half the time was saved.
  9. Using the same figures (standard 12 hours, taken 8 hours, ₹60 an hour), what are the worker's total earnings under the Rowan plan, in rupees? Type the number.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 640

    Time wage = 8 × 60 = ₹480. Bonus = (time saved ÷ standard time) × time wage = (4 ÷ 12) × 480 = ₹160. Total = ₹640. Rowan pays more than Halsey here because less than half the standard time was saved.
  10. Under the paired comparison method, how many pairs must be compared for 8 employees? Type the number.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 28

    The number of pairs is n(n − 1) ÷ 2 = 8 × 7 ÷ 2 = 28. The count rises quickly with group size, which is why paired comparison is practical only for small groups.