Town Planning and Housing: Principles, Planned Cities, Neighbourhoods, Densities and Standards

This is the first of two chapters on Part A, Section A.4 of the Architecture and Planning paper, “Town Planning, Housing and Real Estate Development”. The heading names fourteen items; this chapter takes the planning half: “Principles and concepts of town planning; Traditional and modern planned cities in India and abroad; Housing typologies; Neighbourhood design; Residential densities; Standards for housing and community facilities; Housing for special areas and needs”. It teaches the aims and the thinkers of town planning (Geddes, Howard, Corbusier, Perry, Stein and Wright), the planner, date and governing idea of the cities the paper pairs (Jaipur, New Delhi, Chandigarh, Bhubaneswar, Gandhinagar, Navi Mumbai, Canberra, Brasilia, Washington), the housing typologies on the density scale, the neighbourhood unit, Radburn, superblock and cluster, net and gross density, the logic of facility standards, and design responses for hills, floods, coasts and special needs. The numericals are net and gross density, persons per hectare from FAR, and facility numbers and areas from a stated norm. The second chapter takes housing economics and real estate.

1. Principles and concepts of town planning

Town planning is the art and science of arranging land uses, circulation, services and open space so that a settlement is healthy, safe, convenient, economical and pleasant. Its working principles are comprehensiveness (the whole settlement and its region are planned together), a hierarchy of plans from region to neighbourhood, functional order through zoning with a sensible mix of uses, balanced densities backed by infrastructure, accessibility for all, flexibility for growth, public participation and sustainability. Plans are made at nested scales: the regional or perspective plan, the city development (master) plan, the local-area plan or layout, and the project.

A handful of thinkers supply the vocabulary. Patrick Geddes insisted on survey, analysis, plan: diagnose the region’s geography, economy and society (place, work, folk) before drawing anything. Ebenezer Howard (1898) proposed the garden city: a town of about 30,000 people on about 1,000 acres, set inside an estate of about 6,000 acres whose other 5,000 acres are a permanent agricultural belt (about 32,000 people in all), with land in community ownership, homes and jobs together, and a cluster of such towns (the social city) joined by rapid transport. Letchworth (1903) and Welwyn (1920) were built on these lines. Le Corbusier and the CIAM Athens Charter (from the 1933 congress) treated the city as four functions kept apart, living, working, recreation and circulation, with towers in open parkland. Clarence Perry and Stein and Wright (both 1929) turned the residential area into a protected, school-centred unit (Section 4).

Concepts and who proposed them
ConceptProposerCore idea
Survey–analysis–planPatrick GeddesStudy the region’s place, work and folk before planning; the region is the unit
Garden cityEbenezer HowardSelf-contained town of limited size, permanent green belt, community-owned land, jobs near homes
Linear cityArturo Soria y Mata (1882)A continuous urban strip along a transport spine
Functional cityLe Corbusier; CIAM Athens CharterLiving, work, recreation and circulation separated; towers in open space
Neighbourhood unitClarence Perry (1929)School-centred residential unit bounded by arterial roads
Radburn ideaClarence Stein and Henry Wright (1929)Superblock and complete separation of pedestrians from vehicles
EkisticsConstantinos DoxiadisThe science of human settlements across all scales
⚠️ Garden city is not a garden suburb
A garden suburb (Hampstead Garden Suburb is the usual example) has pleasant, low-density housing but depends on the nearby city for work; it has no permanent belt and no local employment. A garden city is a complete town. The paper’s trap is to treat any green, low-density estate as a garden city.

2. Traditional and modern planned cities in India and abroad

Traditional Indian planning drew on the Vastu and Shilpa texts (Manasara, Mayamata): a settlement laid on mandala-like geometry oriented to the cardinal directions, a central temple or palace, wide ceremonial streets and quarters allotted by occupation. The Harappan cities (Mohenjo-daro, Harappa) are far older planned towns, with a street grid, a citadel and a lower town, and covered drains. Modern planned cities are best learned as a table of planner, date and the one big planning idea, because the paper pairs them.

Planned cities: planner, date, governing idea
CityPlanner and dateGoverning idea
JaipurSawai Jai Singh II, 1727; chief architect Vidyadhar BhattacharyaWalled grid city on Shilpa-shastra principles, divided into nine blocks (chowkris); broad axial streets lined by bazaars
New DelhiEdwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker; capital announced 1911, inaugurated 1931Ceremonial axis and radial avenues on hexagonal geometry, the Central Vista, a low-density bungalow zone
ChandigarhLe Corbusier with Pierre Jeanneret, Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew, after the earlier Mayer–Nowicki plan; 1950sSectors of about 800 m × 1,200 m, a seven-level road hierarchy (V1 to V7), Capitol Complex, continuous green belts
BhubaneswarOtto Königsberger, 1948New capital of Odisha planned as neighbourhood units with open space, beside the old temple city
GandhinagarCapital of Gujarat; H. K. Mewada and Prakash M. Apte, 1960sCity divided into sectors on Chandigarh-like lines, each with its own facilities, within a strong green framework
Navi MumbaiCIDCO, 1970; conceived as a twin city across Thane CreekA counter-magnet to Mumbai: a chain of nodes along the rail and road corridor to divert population and jobs
CanberraWalter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin; competition 1912A land axis and a water axis, geometry of circles, triangles and hexagons, an artificial lake, garden-city influence
BrasiliaLúcio Costa, Plano Piloto 1957; principal buildings by Oscar Niemeyer; inaugurated 1960Two crossing axes (monumental and residential), housing in superblocks (superquadras), strict functional separation
WashingtonPierre Charles L’Enfant, 1791; McMillan Plan 1901–02 restored the MallBaroque diagonal avenues laid over a grid, with sight-lines between the principal buildings
⚠️ Who planned what
Chandigarh was first planned by Albert Mayer and Matthew Nowicki and then re-planned by Le Corbusier’s team. Brasilia’s plan is Costa’s; Niemeyer designed its buildings. Canberra is Griffin’s, New Delhi is Lutyens and Baker’s, and Bhubaneswar is Königsberger’s. Le Corbusier did not plan Jaipur, Gandhinagar or Brasilia.

Read the table for patterns. Capital cities (New Delhi, Canberra, Washington, Brasilia) are organised by axes and sight-lines because they express state power. Post-independence Indian new towns (Chandigarh, Bhubaneswar, Gandhinagar) use the neighbourhood unit or sector as the building block, with a road hierarchy that keeps through traffic on the edge. Navi Mumbai is a metropolitan-scale idea, decongestion by a counter-magnet, not a capital. Jaipur is the traditional model: geometry from the texts, and a trading city whose bazaar streets are its spine.

3. Housing typologies

A housing typology is a recurring combination of dwelling form, plot arrangement and tenure. Classify housing by form (how units sit on the land), by tenure (who owns or rents) and by income group (whom it is meant for). Form decides land consumption, achievable density, cost per unit and the quality of private open space, so the paper expects you to place each form on the density scale.

Housing forms on the density scale
TypologyFormDensity positionMerit and limit
Detached house (bungalow)One dwelling on its own plot, open on all sidesLowest; most land per householdPrivacy and light on four sides; highest land and service cost per unit
Semi-detached houseTwo dwellings sharing a party wallLowSaves one side set-back and wall; two open sides only
Row (terrace) houseContinuous line of narrow-frontage units sharing side walls, each with its own entrance and rear yardMedium to high for ground-related housingEconomical in land and services; light and air only from front and back, so plan depth is limited
Courtyard or cluster housesUnits grouped around a shared court or green, or around private patios (pol, haveli)Medium to highClimate-responsive and sociable; needs careful layout and upkeep of the common space
Walk-up apartmentsLow-rise flats reached by stairsHighLand-efficient without lifts; height limited by what people will climb and by code thresholds for lifts
High-rise towerTall block with liftsHighest per site, but see the note belowFrees ground for open space; costly structure, services, fire safety and upkeep; weak neighbourly contact
Chawl or tenementSingle-room units along a shared corridor with common toiletsVery high crowdingCheap to build and close to work; poor light, ventilation and sanitation

By tenure: owner-occupied (freehold or leasehold), cooperative society, apartment (condominium) ownership, rental (private, public or employer), and hostels or dormitories for students, workers and single occupants. By income group: economically weaker section (EWS), low income group (LIG), middle income group (MIG) and high income group (HIG), each defined by a household-income band that the scheme or authority sets and revises, so the band is always stated, never assumed.

⚠️ High density does not need high-rise
Row houses, cluster housing and walk-ups reach high net densities with ground contact. Towers add floors, but taller blocks must stand farther apart for light, air and fire access, so net density does not rise in step with height, while cost per unit does. Judge a typology by density, cost, open space and livability together.

4. Neighbourhood design: Perry, Radburn, superblock and cluster

The neighbourhood is the planning unit in which daily life is meant to be possible on foot. Perry’s neighbourhood unit (1929) has six principles. (1) Size: the population that supports one elementary school, roughly 5,000 people on about 160 acres in Perry’s example, so the walk from edge to centre is about a quarter mile. (2) Boundaries: arterial streets that carry through traffic around the unit, not through it. (3) Open space: a system of small parks and recreation spaces. (4) Institution sites: the school and other institutions grouped at the centre. (5) Local shopping: at the edge, at traffic junctions, ideally beside the shops of the adjoining unit. (6) Internal street system: a hierarchy of narrow streets that serve the unit and discourage through traffic.

Radburn (New Jersey, 1929, “a town for the motor age”) answered the car. Its five ideas: (1) the superblock in place of the small gridiron block; (2) specialised roads, each street built for one kind of traffic; (3) complete separation of pedestrians from vehicles, with underpasses or bridges at crossings; (4) houses turned around: living rooms and gardens face a park, service and garage side faces a cul-de-sac; (5) the park as the backbone of the neighbourhood. A superblock is a large block, several times an ordinary one, closed to through traffic, bounded by arterials and served inside by cul-de-sacs and footpaths. Chandigarh’s sectors and Brasilia’s superquadras apply the superblock idea at city scale. Cluster housing groups a few dozen dwellings round a shared court, green or parking court and leaves the rest as common open space: the same homes with shorter roads and services, or the same land with more open space.

Neighbourhood concepts compared
ConceptCore deviceStrengthCommon criticism
Neighbourhood unit (Perry)School at the centre; arterial boundaryWalkable, safe for children, identifiableAssumes self-sufficiency and social sameness; city-wide jobs and services cross its edge
RadburnSuperblock, cul-de-sacs, grade-separated footpath spineSafe, quiet, green coreBacks of houses face the street and paths are poorly overlooked, which weakens surveillance
SuperblockLarge block closed to through trafficQuiet interior, fewer junctionsLong walks round the perimeter; monotony; inflexible
ClusterDwellings round a shared courtShorter roads, shared open space, communityParking and upkeep of the commons need management
GridironSmall blocks, many junctionsFlexible, permeable, easy to navigateLets through traffic into residential streets
🧠 Perry = Primary school, Radburn = Roads separated
If the stem says the unit is sized by a school and bounded by arterials, it is Perry. If it says cul-de-sacs, houses turned to the park and pedestrians separated from vehicles, it is Radburn. Modern walkable-neighbourhood and transit-oriented planning keeps Perry’s pedestrian shed of about 400 m (a five-minute walk) and drops his enclosed, single-use character.

5. Residential densities

Density is a quantity per unit area, expressed in persons per hectare (pph) or dwelling units per hectare (du/ha). What matters is the area in the denominator. Gross density divides the population (or dwellings) by the whole area of the layout or neighbourhood, including roads, open space, schools and shops. Net density divides it by the net residential area only, the land under dwelling plots (conventions differ on whether local access streets inside the housing block are counted, so the stem states it). For the same population, net density is always at least as large as gross density.

Density measures and their denominators
MeasureFormulaUnit
Gross densityPopulation ÷ total area of the layoutpersons/ha
Net residential densityPopulation ÷ net residential areapersons/ha
Dwelling densityDwelling units ÷ area (gross or net, as stated)du/ha
Population density of a cityPopulation ÷ whole city areapersons/km²
Persons per roomPersons ÷ rooms (a crowding measure, not a density of land)persons/room

Worked example 1. A neighbourhood of 48 ha houses 14,400 persons; 60% of its area is residential plots. Gross density = 14,400 ÷ 48 = 300 pph. Net residential area = 0.6 × 48 = 28.8 ha, so net density = 14,400 ÷ 28.8 = 500 pph. The same result comes from plots: if each 100 m² plot holds a household of 5, one net hectare has 100 plots and 500 persons, and 60% of a gross hectare is plots, so gross density is 0.6 × 500 = 300 pph. Worked example 2 (FAR). A 1 ha plot with FAR 1.8 has 18,000 m² of floor area; if all of it is dwellings of 60 m² each, there are 300 dwellings, and at 4 persons each the net density is 1,200 pph. Unit conversions: 1 ha = 10,000 m² ≈ 2.47 acres, so dwellings per acre × 2.47 = dwellings per hectare.

⚠️ Gross is the smaller number; and watch the denominator
Net density is gross density divided by the residential share of the land, so it is the larger figure. Adding parks and roads at fixed population lowers gross density and leaves net density unchanged. Questions also swap hectares for acres, and ask for density at the level of the plot (FAR-based), the layout or the city; always read which area is in the denominator. Density is a land measure; crowding is a room measure, so a low-density area can be crowded and a high-density one uncrowded.

6. Standards for housing and community facilities

A standard converts need into a planning quantity. Facility standards rest on three ideas. Threshold population is the minimum population that makes a unit viable. Catchment (service radius) is the walking or travel distance within which users should be served. Hierarchy groups facilities by the tier of settlement unit, housing cluster, neighbourhood, community, district and city, each tier carrying the facilities whose thresholds it can meet. Indian standards (the URDPFI Guidelines and state development-control rules) state these as population per unit and area per unit or per 1,000 persons; the figures vary with city size and region, so a question supplies the norm in its stem.

Planning logic by facility group
Facility groupPlanning logic
Pre-primary and primary schoolLowest threshold and shortest walk; young children should not cross an arterial road; place inside the neighbourhood beside open space
Secondary and senior secondary schoolHigher threshold and larger catchment; community level on a collector road, reached by cycle or bus
HealthDispensary or clinic at neighbourhood or community level; hospital at district level with ambulance access from an arterial
ShoppingConvenience shops for daily needs within walking distance, at the edge or a junction; weekly market and larger centres at community and district level
Parks and play areasTot-lots near each cluster, playground at the neighbourhood, larger park at district level; area fixed per 1,000 persons or per person
Safety, civic and utilityFire, police, post, community hall and utilities (sub-station, water tank, waste collection) sited by response time and service area

Standards for housing itself cover dwelling floor area and persons per room (the crowding test), plot sizes by income group, ground coverage, FAR and set-backs, road widths by hierarchy, and the land-use split of a residential layout: typically residential plots take about half to three-fifths of the land and roads, open space and facilities share the rest. Building codes (the National Building Code and local bye-laws) fix minimum room sizes, light and ventilation.

Worked example. A town of 40,000 persons; assumed norm of one dispensary per 15,000 persons, on 0.2 ha each. Dispensaries needed = 40,000 ÷ 15,000 = 2.67, rounded up to 3 whole units so that no catchment exceeds the norm; land = 3 × 0.2 = 0.6 ha. A per-capita norm works the other way: 2.5 m² of playground per person for 20,000 persons is 50,000 m² = 5 ha.

⚠️ Threshold and radius are two tests
A facility must pass both: enough people to be viable (threshold) and close enough to reach (service radius). A school with a large enough population but a catchment that forces children across an arterial still fails. Do not memorise a norm the question will give you; learn the logic of the hierarchy and how to turn a norm into units and hectares, rounding the count of units up.

7. Housing for special areas and needs

Special areas change the layout, not only the building. Hazard decides where housing may go, how dense it may be and how it is raised, roofed and drained; climate decides form and orientation.

Design responses by area
AreaMain problemHousing response
Hill terrainSlope instability, surface drainage, difficult access, little buildable landFollow contours; terraced or stepped clusters; minimal cut and fill; retaining and drainage works; light structures; avoid unstable slopes; lower density and limited height; pedestrian lanes
Flood-prone and riverineInundation, silt, isolationSites above flood level; raised plinth or stilts with a non-habitable ground level; flood-resistant materials; evacuation routes; do not fill floodplain storage
Coastal and cyclone-proneWind, storm surge, saltSet-backs from the shoreline as the coastal regulation requires; stilts; anchored, wind-resistant roofs; cyclone shelters; shelter-belts of trees
Earthquake-proneShaking, brittle failureSimple, regular, compact plans; ductile detailing; light roofs; adequate separation between buildings
Hot-dry, hot-humid, cold climatesHeat, humidity or coldHot-dry: courtyards, narrow shaded lanes, shared walls. Hot-humid: cross-ventilation, deep verandahs, open layouts. Cold: compact form, solar gain, insulation
Tribal and rural-fringe areasCultural fit, livelihoods, local materialsParticipatory design; local materials and craft; livelihood space at home; do not impose a city standard layout

Special needs are met by design, location and tenure together. The elderly: ground-floor or lift-served homes, barrier-free paths, nearness to health care and company. Persons with disabilities: barrier-free, universal design, with ramps commonly at no steeper than 1 in 12, wide doors and tactile paths. Working women, single occupants, students and migrant workers: hostels, dormitories and affordable rental housing near work, with safety designed in. The homeless: night shelters with basic services. Disaster-affected families: transitional shelter first, then owner-driven reconstruction with technical help. Families displaced by projects: resettlement close to the original livelihood, not on a distant periphery.

🎯 Same density rule, different site
On a steep site the buildable fraction is small, so gross density must fall or buildings must step; in a flood plain the safe response is to move or lift the dwelling, not to ignore the water. The judgement the paper tests is matching the intervention to the hazard or the user: raised plinth for floods, contour-following clusters for hills, rental dormitories for seasonal migrants, in-place rehabilitation for tribal communities.

Key takeaways

  • Town planning aims at health, safety, convenience, economy and amenity. Geddes gave survey–analysis–plan, Howard the garden city (about 30,000 in the town, a permanent agricultural belt around it), Corbusier and CIAM the four separated functions, Perry the school-centred unit, Stein and Wright the Radburn superblock.
  • Pair planner, date and idea: Jaipur (Jai Singh II, 1727, nine-block grid), New Delhi (Lutyens and Baker), Chandigarh (Corbusier, 800 m × 1,200 m sectors, V1 to V7), Bhubaneswar (Königsberger, 1948), Navi Mumbai (CIDCO, counter-magnet), Canberra (Griffin), Brasilia (Costa plan, Niemeyer buildings), Washington (L’Enfant, 1791).
  • Housing form sets density, cost and open space: detached, semi-detached, row, courtyard or cluster, walk-up, high-rise, chawl. High density does not require high-rise, and taller blocks need wider spacing, so net density does not rise in step with height.
  • Perry’s six principles are size by one elementary school, arterial boundaries, open space, central institutions, edge shops and a calm internal street system. Radburn’s five are the superblock, specialised roads, pedestrian–vehicle separation, houses turned to the park, and the park as backbone. Cluster housing leaves common open space and cuts road length.
  • Gross density = population ÷ whole area; net density = population ÷ net residential area, so net is the larger. At fixed population, more roads and parks lower gross density and leave net density unchanged. Net density from FAR = FAR × 10,000 m² × dwelling share ÷ floor area per dwelling × persons per dwelling.
  • Facility standards rest on threshold population, service radius and hierarchy; units needed = population ÷ threshold per unit, rounded up, and land = units × site area. Special areas and needs are met by matching the intervention to the hazard or user: contour clusters on hills, raised plinths in floods, barrier-free design, rental hostels for migrants and in-place rehabilitation for those displaced.

Practice questions (18)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Which planning idea rests on a town of limited size set in a permanent agricultural belt, with land held in community ownership and jobs located near homes?

    1. Soria y Mata’s linear city, a continuous urban strip along a transport spine
    2. Le Corbusier’s functional city, with towers in open parkland and functions kept apart
    3. Howard’s garden city, a self-contained town ringed by a permanent agricultural belt
    4. Perry’s neighbourhood unit, a school-centred residential area bounded by arterial roads
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Howard’s garden city, a self-contained town ringed by a permanent agricultural belt

    Howard’s garden city combines limited size, a permanent agricultural belt, community-owned land and local employment in one self-contained town. The neighbourhood unit is the tempting answer because it is also bounded and compact, but it is a residential area inside a city, with no agricultural belt, no community land ownership and no employment base.
  2. Which statement about the layout of Chandigarh is correct?

    1. Its sectors, each roughly 800 m by 1,200 m, are bounded by fast-traffic roads and carry schools, shops and open space inside
    2. Its sectors are long strips along one transport spine, each reached straight from the arterial road with no internal road hierarchy
    3. Its plan was drawn by Walter Burley Griffin around a land axis and a water axis, with an artificial lake as the centrepiece
    4. Its housing is grouped in superquadras of tall slab blocks laid out on the wings of an aeroplane-shaped plan
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Its sectors, each roughly 800 m by 1,200 m, are bounded by fast-traffic roads and carry schools, shops and open space inside

    Chandigarh’s building block is the sector of about 800 m by 1,200 m, bounded by fast roads and organised inside as a neighbourhood with its own schools, shops and green space, under a seven-level road hierarchy. The land-axis and water-axis plan with a lake is Canberra by Griffin; superquadras on an aeroplane-shaped plan are Brasilia, the tempting mix-up because both are mid-century capitals with superblock housing.
  3. Which of the following pairs of city and planner is correct?

    1. Canberra and Pierre Charles L’Enfant, who laid it out around a land axis and a water axis
    2. Brasilia and Lúcio Costa, whose Plano Piloto was chosen for the new capital in 1957
    3. Bhubaneswar and Le Corbusier, who planned the Odisha capital in sectors with a Capitol Complex
    4. New Delhi and Walter Burley Griffin, who laid out the imperial capital on hexagonal geometry
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Brasilia and Lúcio Costa, whose Plano Piloto was chosen for the new capital in 1957

    Costa’s Plano Piloto (1957) is Brasilia’s plan; Niemeyer designed its principal buildings. L’Enfant planned Washington (1791); Canberra is Griffin’s; Le Corbusier planned Chandigarh, while Bhubaneswar is Königsberger’s; New Delhi is Lutyens and Baker’s. The tempting wrong pair is Bhubaneswar with Le Corbusier, because Chandigarh, the other post-independence capital, is so closely tied to him.
  4. Perry’s neighbourhood unit is sized by the population needed to support

    1. a district hospital with its own ambulance service
    2. a weekly market together with a community hall
    3. a place of worship placed at the centre of the unit
    4. one elementary school, which is placed at the centre
    Show answer

    Answer: D — one elementary school, which is placed at the centre

    Perry sized the unit to the catchment of one elementary school and placed the school, with other institutions, at the centre so that no child walks far or crosses an arterial road. Shops go to the edge, not the centre; hospitals and weekly markets belong to larger tiers of the hierarchy.
  5. Which feature most directly characterises the Radburn layout?

    1. A fine gridiron of small blocks so that traffic spreads evenly over a great many streets
    2. A ring of shops and offices round a central square, reached by radial streets
    3. Superblocks with cul-de-sacs, houses facing a park, and pedestrians kept from vehicles
    4. A continuous strip of housing along both sides of a single transit road through the city
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Superblocks with cul-de-sacs, houses facing a park, and pedestrians kept from vehicles

    Radburn combined the superblock, cul-de-sacs for service access, houses turned to face a park, and complete separation of pedestrians from vehicles. A fine gridiron is the opposite idea, since it admits traffic to every street; the linear strip belongs to Soria y Mata, and the ring around a central square is a radial plan.
  6. A planner must (i) keep through traffic out of a housing area, (ii) let children walk to the primary school without crossing a motor road, and (iii) put shops where the adjoining area can also use them. Which scheme meets all three?

    1. A Perry-type unit: arterial boundary, central school reached by internal paths, shops at an edge junction beside the neighbour’s shops
    2. A gridiron of identical small blocks, with shops spread along every street and the primary schools placed on the arterial roads
    3. A Radburn-type superblock whose only shopping street runs through its middle and serves that superblock alone, not its neighbours
    4. A linear strip along a through road, with one school at each end and shops on both sides of that road, open to all passing traffic
    Show answer

    Answer: A — A Perry-type unit: arterial boundary, central school reached by internal paths, shops at an edge junction beside the neighbour’s shops

    Only the neighbourhood-unit scheme meets all three tests: arterial boundaries divert through traffic, the central school is reached by internal paths, and shops at an edge junction beside the neighbouring unit’s shops serve both. The superblock is tempting because it also keeps traffic out, but a shopping street through its middle serves one superblock only; the gridiron and the through-road strip admit traffic.
  7. The same plots and population are kept, but the layout is enlarged by adding parks and roads around them. What happens to the gross and net residential densities?

    1. Gross density rises and net density falls
    2. Gross density falls and net density is unchanged
    3. Both fall in the same proportion
    4. Net density falls and gross density is unchanged
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Gross density falls and net density is unchanged

    Gross density divides the population by the whole area, which has grown, so it falls. Net density divides it by the residential plots only, which have not changed, so it is unchanged. The claim that net density falls and gross density stays put reverses the roles: adding roads and parks cannot lower the density measured over the plots alone.
  8. Two housing schemes have the same gross density of 250 persons per hectare. In scheme X, 60% of the land is residential plots; in scheme Y, 40%. Which has the higher net density, and what are the net densities?

    1. Scheme X, at about 150 pph against about 100 pph for Y
    2. Scheme X, at about 625 pph against about 417 pph for Y
    3. Both schemes at 250 pph, because the gross densities are equal
    4. Scheme Y, at about 625 pph against about 417 pph for X
    Show answer

    Answer: D — Scheme Y, at about 625 pph against about 417 pph for X

    Net density = gross density ÷ plot share. For X: 250 ÷ 0.6 ≈ 417 pph; for Y: 250 ÷ 0.4 = 625 pph. Y, which gives less land to plots, must pack more people on each plotted hectare to reach the same gross figure. Multiplying by the share instead of dividing (150 and 100) is the usual slip and would even make net lower than gross.
  9. In facility planning, “threshold population” means

    1. the largest population a single facility can serve without becoming overcrowded
    2. the walking distance within which a user is expected to reach the facility
    3. the smallest population whose demand makes the facility viable to provide
    4. the land area allotted to the facility for every 1,000 persons served
    Show answer

    Answer: C — the smallest population whose demand makes the facility viable to provide

    The threshold is the minimum population needed to justify a unit. The walking distance is the service radius or catchment, a different test; the area per 1,000 persons is an area norm; and the largest population a facility can serve is its capacity, not its threshold.
  10. A housing scheme is proposed on a hillside of moderate slope with good views, seasonal streams and a road along the upper edge. Which layout response best fits the site?

    1. Terraced clusters on the contours, access lanes along them, streams kept free for drainage, retaining works where needed
    2. Level the whole hillside by deep cutting and filling so that a regular gridiron of equal plots can be laid out across it
    3. Place long slab blocks across the slope to give every flat a view and to shorten the length of road needed
    4. Divert the seasonal streams into pipes beneath the plots so that the whole slope can be built at plains density
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Terraced clusters on the contours, access lanes along them, streams kept free for drainage, retaining works where needed

    On a slope the layout should follow the land: contour-aligned terraces and lanes need little cut and fill, keep natural drainage lines open and spread the load on the hillside. Levelling creates unstable cut faces; slabs across the slope block drainage and cause heavy cut and fill; piping streams under plots invites flooding and failure, and plains density is unsuitable on a slope.
  11. Which of the following are ideas of the Radburn layout? Select all that apply.

    1. Houses turned so that living rooms and gardens face a park
    2. A continuous line of shops along every residential street
    3. Complete separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic
    4. Superblocks served by cul-de-sacs in place of small gridiron blocks
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Houses turned so that living rooms and gardens face a park; C — Complete separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic; D — Superblocks served by cul-de-sacs in place of small gridiron blocks

    The Radburn idea has five parts: superblock, specialised roads, complete pedestrian–vehicle separation, houses turned to the park, and the park as backbone. A continuous line of shops along every residential street contradicts it, since it would bring vehicles and customers to the front of every home.
  12. Select the correct statements about planned cities.

    1. Navi Mumbai was developed by CIDCO as a counter-magnet to divert growth from Mumbai
    2. Washington’s 1791 plan by L’Enfant laid baroque diagonal avenues over a street grid
    3. Canberra was laid out by Le Corbusier as a city of sectors around a Capitol Complex
    4. Jaipur was laid out in 1727 by Sawai Jai Singh II as a walled city of nine blocks
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Navi Mumbai was developed by CIDCO as a counter-magnet to divert growth from Mumbai; B — Washington’s 1791 plan by L’Enfant laid baroque diagonal avenues over a street grid; D — Jaipur was laid out in 1727 by Sawai Jai Singh II as a walled city of nine blocks

    Navi Mumbai (CIDCO, counter-magnet), Washington (L’Enfant, diagonals over a grid) and Jaipur (Jai Singh II, 1727, nine blocks) are correctly described. Canberra is the work of Walter Burley Griffin and Marion Mahony Griffin around land and water axes; the sector city around a Capitol Complex is Chandigarh, which is where this wrong statement borrows from.
  13. Which of the following belong to Perry’s neighbourhood unit?

    1. The unit is bounded by arterial streets so that through traffic goes round it
    2. The local shops are placed in the middle of the unit, beside the school
    3. Arterial roads run through the centre so that customers reach the school easily
    4. The size of the unit is set by the population that supports one elementary school
    Show answer

    Answer: A — The unit is bounded by arterial streets so that through traffic goes round it; D — The size of the unit is set by the population that supports one elementary school

    Perry bounded the unit by arterials and sized it by one elementary school’s population. His local shops sit at the edge, at traffic junctions, not in the middle, and arterial roads are kept out of the centre, since the school and children’s paths are protected from through traffic.
  14. Select the correct statements about residential density.

    1. Persons per room is a measure of the density of land
    2. For a given layout, net density is never lower than gross density
    3. Gross density counts roads, open space and facilities in its area
    4. At a fixed number of persons per plot, doubling the plots per net hectare doubles the net density
    Show answer

    Answer: B — For a given layout, net density is never lower than gross density; C — Gross density counts roads, open space and facilities in its area; D — At a fixed number of persons per plot, doubling the plots per net hectare doubles the net density

    Net density divides by the smaller, residential-only area, so it is never lower than gross; gross density divides by the whole layout; and at a fixed number of persons per plot, net density is proportional to plots per net hectare. Persons per room measures crowding inside dwellings, not the density of land, which is the usual confusion.
  15. A rectangular sector of 800 m by 1,200 m houses 19,200 persons. Its gross density, in persons per hectare, is ____.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 200

    Area = 800 × 1,200 = 960,000 m² = 96 ha (1 ha = 10,000 m²). Gross density = 19,200 ÷ 96 = 200 persons per hectare. Check: 96 × 200 = 19,200.
  16. A neighbourhood of 50 ha houses 15,000 persons, and 40% of its area is under residential plots. Its net residential density, in persons per hectare, is ____.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 750

    Net residential area = 0.40 × 50 = 20 ha. Net density = 15,000 ÷ 20 = 750 persons per hectare. The gross density, 15,000 ÷ 50 = 300, is the trap; net = gross ÷ 0.4 = 750 agrees.
  17. A group-housing site has a net plot area of 2 ha and a FAR of 1.5. Of the floor area, 20% is common circulation and services and the rest is in dwellings of 60 m² each, with 4.5 persons per dwelling. The net density, in persons per hectare of plot, is ____.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 900

    Plot = 20,000 m²; floor area = 1.5 × 20,000 = 30,000 m². Dwelling floor = 0.8 × 30,000 = 24,000 m²; dwellings = 24,000 ÷ 60 = 400; persons = 400 × 4.5 = 1,800. Net density = 1,800 ÷ 2 = 900 persons per hectare. Ignoring the 20% would give 1,125.
  18. A layout is planned for 36,000 persons. The assumed norm is one primary school for every 5,000 persons, on a site of 0.4 ha, and only whole schools are provided (round the number up). The total school land, in hectares, correct to one decimal place, is ____.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 3.2

    Schools = 36,000 ÷ 5,000 = 7.2, rounded up to 8 whole schools so that no catchment exceeds the norm. Land = 8 × 0.4 = 3.2 ha. Using 7.2 directly would give 2.88, the trap of not rounding the unit count.