Agriculture, Industry & Infrastructure: Policies, Schemes and Financing

This chapter covers the producing economy — farms, factories and the roads, rails, ports and power lines that connect them — as a set of institutions and policy choices. It begins with how the State supports farm prices and buys grain (CACP, MSP, FCI, procurement and the public distribution system), then how farmers borrow and insure (Kisan Credit Card, interest subvention, PMFBY). It traces industrial policy from the resolutions of 1948 and 1956 to the break of 1991, explains how MSMEs are defined and financed, and what Make in India and the production-linked incentive schemes actually pay for. The second half is about building and paying for infrastructure: the PPP models (BOT, EPC, HAM, TOT), viability gap funding, InvITs and the other financing vehicles, and finally logistics and energy — GatiShakti, the logistics policy, power-sector reform and the clean-energy missions. Schemes are described by their design, because their outlays and achievements change every year.

Farm Prices, Procurement and the Public Distribution System

The Agricultural Prices Commission was set up in 1965 and renamed the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) in 1985. It is an attached office of the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare — not a statutory or constitutional body — and it recommends minimum support prices for 22 mandated crops (kharif and rabi cereals, pulses and oilseeds, cotton, and the commercial crops copra and jute) and the price of sugarcane. In framing its advice it weighs the cost of production, demand and supply, domestic and international prices, parity between crops, the terms of trade between agriculture and the rest of the economy, and the effect on consumers. The decision is taken by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs. An MSP is a policy announcement, not a legal entitlement: no statute obliges anyone to buy at that price, and it bites only where a public agency actually procures.

Sugarcane is the exception with legal backing. Its Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP), which replaced the Statutory Minimum Price in 2009, is fixed under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, issued under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and sugar mills are bound to pay it; several states announce a higher State Advised Price. The Food Corporation of India (FCI), set up in 1965 under the Food Corporations Act, 1964, buys wheat and rice at MSP, stores them, moves them across the country, supplies the states for distribution and holds the buffer stock against the norms the Government sets. Under Decentralised Procurement (DCP), begun in 1997-98, a state government itself procures, stores and distributes grain, and the Centre meets the approved cost — which brings procurement closer to farmers in states the FCI reached thinly. FCI can also sell grain in the open market under the Open Market Sale Scheme (Domestic) to cool prices.

For pulses, oilseeds and copra the umbrella is PM-AASHA (Pradhan Mantri Annadata Aay Sanrakshan Abhiyan, 2018). It has three arms: the Price Support Scheme, under which central nodal agencies such as NAFED physically procure at MSP; the Price Deficiency Payment Scheme, under which oilseed farmers are paid the difference between the MSP and the market price without the government buying the crop; and a pilot Private Procurement and Stockist Scheme. A separate Price Stabilisation Fund (2014-15) builds buffers of pulses and onions to dampen consumer price spikes.

From rationing to a legal right to food
  1. 1940s
    Wartime rationing in cities — the origin of the Public Distribution System
  2. 1992
    Revamped PDS for drought-prone, hilly, tribal and remote blocks
  3. June 1997
    Targeted PDS — separate prices for households below and above the poverty line
  4. December 2000
    Antyodaya Anna Yojana for the poorest of the poor households
  5. 2013
    National Food Security Act — subsidised grain becomes a legal entitlement for up to 75% of the rural and 50% of the urban population; the eldest woman of 18 or above is the head of household on the ration card
  6. 2023–24
    Grain for NFSA households made free under the PM Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana from 1 January 2023, extended in late 2023 for five years from 1 January 2024
⚠️ Exam trap
Separate the three roles: CACP recommends, the CCEA decides, the FCI (or a state under DCP) procures. The FCI does not fix prices, and the CACP buys nothing. And of all the support prices, only the sugarcane FRP has statutory force, through an order under the Essential Commodities Act. The per-person NFSA entitlements are set out in the chapter on poverty and employment.

Farm Credit and Crop Insurance

Institutional farm credit reaches the village through three channels: commercial banks, Regional Rural Banks (created by ordinance in 1975 and the RRB Act, 1976, owned by the Centre, a sponsor bank and the state in the ratio 50:35:15), and the short-term cooperative structure of state cooperative banks, district central cooperative banks and primary agricultural credit societies (PACS). Behind them stand NABARD as the refinancer and priority-sector lending as the obligation — both met in the chapter on institutions. The point of the whole structure is to replace the village moneylender, whose interest rates the formal system was built to undercut.

  • Kisan Credit Card (KCC), 1998 — a revolving credit limit, designed by NABARD on the recommendations of the R. V. Gupta Committee, so that a farmer can draw for seeds, fertiliser and other crop needs without a fresh loan application each season. It was extended to farmers in animal husbandry and fisheries in 2018-19.
  • Interest subvention — the Centre subsidises short-term crop loans up to a ceiling so that they carry 7% a year, with a further 3% prompt-repayment incentive, making the effective rate 4% for a farmer who repays on time.
  • Collectives — the scheme for 10,000 Farmer Producer Organisations (2020) helps small farmers pool produce and bargain as one seller; the Agriculture Infrastructure Fund (2020) offers interest subvention and credit guarantees on loans for post-harvest infrastructure such as warehouses and cold storage.

Crop insurance went through several generations — the Comprehensive Crop Insurance Scheme (1985), the National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (1999), weather-based insurance (2007) — before the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY), launched for the kharif season of 2016. Its design is built around a low, uniform premium for the farmer, with the rest paid by government:

PMFBY: the farmer’s share of the premium
CropFarmer pays (of sum insured)
Kharif foodgrains and oilseeds2%
Rabi foodgrains and oilseeds1.5%
Annual commercial and horticultural crops5%

The balance of the premium is shared equally by the Centre and the state, and 90:10 in the north-eastern and Himalayan states. Widespread losses are assessed on an area approach — a notified area is the unit and crop-cutting experiments estimate the yield — while localised calamities (hailstorm, landslide, inundation, cloudburst, natural fire) and post-harvest losses from cyclonic or unseasonal rain on a crop left to dry in the field are assessed farm by farm. Since kharif 2020 enrolment has been voluntary for all farmers, including those with crop loans, for whom it was earlier compulsory.

🧠 Memory trick
PMFBY premiums in one line: "Kharif two, rabi one-and-a-half, cash crops five." Rabi is lower than kharif because the winter crop faces less weather risk than the monsoon crop. The usual trap swaps the first two.

Industrial Policy from 1948 to 1991

Independent India decided early that the State would build the base of industry and the private sector would work within limits the State drew. Each resolution redrew those limits; questions usually test how many categories each one had and what fell into them.

The landmark industrial policies
PolicyStructureWhat to remember
Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948Four categories: (1) State monopoly — arms and ammunition, atomic energy, railways; (2) mixed — new units in six basic industries such as coal, iron and steel, aircraft, shipbuilding and mineral oils to be set up by the State, existing private units left alone for ten years; (3) industries under State regulation and control; (4) the rest open to private enterpriseFollowed by the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, the legal basis of industrial licensing
Industrial Policy Resolution, 1956Three schedules: Schedule A — 17 industries, the exclusive responsibility of the State; Schedule B — 12 industries, to be progressively State-owned, with private enterprise supplementing; Schedule C — all the rest, left to private initiativeCalled the "economic constitution" of India; rooted in the "socialist pattern of society" and the Mahalanobis strategy of the Second Plan
1969 – 1980MRTP Act, 1969 curbs concentration of economic power; FERA, 1973 tightens control on foreign firms; the 1977 policy stresses small and cottage industry and creates District Industries CentresThe high-water mark of the "licence-permit raj"
New Industrial Policy, 24 July 1991Licensing abolished except for 18 industries; industries reserved for the public sector cut from 17 to 8; MRTP asset limits for prior approval scrapped; automatic approval of foreign equity up to 51% in priority industries; disinvestment of public-sector shares begunBoth lists have since shrunk further: compulsory licensing survives for a handful of industries on grounds of security, safety and health, and for most of the period since 2001 only atomic energy and railway operations have stayed reserved for the public sector

The MRTP Act was replaced by the Competition Act, 2002, which set up the Competition Commission of India to act against anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance and harmful combinations — regulating conduct rather than size, which is the whole philosophical change from 1969. Public-sector policy moved from expansion to management and sale: the department responsible was renamed the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) in 2016, and the best-performing central public-sector enterprises are graded Maharatna, Navratna and Miniratna, with greater financial autonomy at each step up.

⚠️ Exam trap
1948 = four categories; 1956 = three schedules (17 + 12 + the rest). The number 17 appears twice and causes trouble: 17 industries were in Schedule A in 1956, and the 1991 policy cut the reserved list from 17 to 8. The 1991 licensing exception was 18 industries — a different list altogether.

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

The legal home of the sector is the MSMED Act, 2006. It originally graded enterprises by investment alone, with separate limits for manufacturing (plant and machinery) and services (equipment). From 1 July 2020 the Government replaced this with a composite test of investment and annual turnover, identical for manufacturing and services, and excluded exports from turnover so that a firm would not lose its status by exporting more. An enterprise that crosses either limit moves to the next class.

MSME classification notified with effect from 1 July 2020
ClassInvestment in plant, machinery or equipment — not more thanAnnual turnover — not more than
Micro₹1 crore₹5 crore
Small₹10 crore₹50 crore
Medium₹50 crore₹250 crore

The limits were raised again with effect from 1 April 2025, following the Union Budget for 2025-26: investment limits to 2.5 times and turnover limits to twice the 2020 figures (micro ₹2.5 crore and ₹10 crore; small ₹25 crore and ₹100 crore; medium ₹125 crore and ₹500 crore). The composite principle of 2020 is what endures, so learn that first and check the current notification before quoting numbers. Registration has been online and paperless through Udyam Registration since July 2020, linked to PAN and GST; the Udyam Assist Platform (2023) brings informal micro units into the formal net.

  • Credit without collateral — the Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE, 2000), set up by the Ministry of MSME and SIDBI, guarantees loans that lenders give without collateral.
  • Getting paid on time — the MSMED Act requires buyers to pay micro and small suppliers within 45 days; since 2023-24 Section 43B(h) of the Income-tax Act denies a buyer the tax deduction for such payments delayed beyond that limit. TReDS platforms let MSMEs sell their invoices to financiers at a discount.
  • Self-employment — the Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP, 2008), formed by merging two earlier schemes and implemented through the Khadi and Village Industries Commission, gives a capital subsidy on bank loans for new micro enterprises.
⚠️ Exam trap
Since 2020 there is no separate definition for service enterprises — that distinction belonged to the 2006 scheme. The test is investment and turnover together, and export turnover does not count. Do not carry the old investment-only figures into a question about the present definition.

Make in India, Ease of Business and Production-Linked Incentives

Make in India was launched on 25 September 2014 to turn India into a manufacturing hub. The nodal department is DPIIT — the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, as the old Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion was renamed in 2019. The campaign rests on four pillars: new processes (easing regulation), new infrastructure (industrial corridors and smart cities), new sectors (opening defence, railways and other areas to private and foreign investment) and a new mindset (the Government as facilitator rather than regulator). The regulatory side has continued through the Business Reform Action Plan, under which DPIIT ranks states on reforms, the National Single Window System (2021) for clearances, and the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023, which decriminalised 183 provisions in 42 central Acts — mostly minor offences that carried jail terms. The World Bank’s Doing Business report, which India had used as a yardstick, was discontinued in 2021.

The production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes are the sharpest industrial instrument of recent years. The first three, notified in 2020, covered mobile phones and electronic components, critical drug intermediates and active pharmaceutical ingredients, and medical devices; later in 2020 the Government approved PLI for ten more sectors, and drones were added in 2021, making fourteen in all — among the later ones automobiles and auto components, pharmaceuticals, telecom and networking products, IT hardware, white goods (air-conditioners and LED lights), food products, textiles (man-made fibre and technical textiles), specialty steel, high-efficiency solar PV modules and advanced chemistry cell batteries. The design is what matters: a firm that commits a minimum investment and achieves incremental sales of goods made in India above a base year receives a percentage of that incremental sales as an incentive for a fixed period, typically about five years. Each scheme is run by its own ministry.

🎯 Why PLI pays on output rather than on investment
Older incentives paid for inputs — a capital subsidy, a tax holiday on a new factory — and so paid even for plants that never produced competitively. A PLI pays only after the goods are made and sold, and only on the sales above the base year, so the subsidy follows scale. That is also its weakness: if the value added in India is thin and most components are imported, a large incentive can sit on a small domestic contribution. The India Semiconductor Mission (2021) applies a related logic to chip fabrication, display fabs and assembly-and-testing units, with fiscal support tied to project cost.

Building Infrastructure: PPP Models and How They Are Financed

What counts as infrastructure — and therefore qualifies for cheaper long-term credit — is fixed by the Harmonised Master List maintained by the Department of Economic Affairs since 2012, in five categories: transport and logistics, energy, water and sanitation, communication, and social and commercial infrastructure. The basic choice in building any of it is who finances, who bears the risk and who collects the revenue. Every model below is an answer to those three questions.

Project models compared, taking a highway as the example
ModelWho finances constructionWho bears traffic (revenue) riskHow the private party is paid
EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction)Government, fullyGovernmentA contract price for building; no role in operation
BOT-Toll (Build–Operate–Transfer)Developer, fullyDeveloperCollects toll through the concession period, then hands the asset back
BOT-AnnuityDeveloper, fullyGovernmentFixed annuities from the government; the government keeps the toll
HAM (Hybrid Annuity Model, 2016)Government 40% during construction, in milestone-linked instalments; developer 60%Government (NHAI collects the toll)The developer’s 60% is repaid as annuities with interest over the operation period
TOT (Toll–Operate–Transfer, 2016)Already built by the governmentInvestorThe investor pays a lump sum upfront for the right to collect toll and maintain an operating highway for a long concession

Variants on BOT change the end of the story: BOOT (build–own–operate–transfer) gives the developer ownership during the concession; BOO (build–own–operate) has no transfer at all; DBFOT adds design and finance explicitly. The Swiss challenge is a procurement method for unsolicited proposals: a private party proposes a project, the government invites competing bids on it, and the original proponent may match the best counter-offer to win. Many PPP projects make economic sense but cannot earn enough to attract investors; for them the Viability Gap Funding scheme (2006) gives a capital grant — up to 20% of project cost from the Centre, with up to a further 20% from the sponsoring authority, and higher shares since 2020 for social-sector projects such as health and education. After a run of stalled highway PPPs, the Kelkar Committee (2015) reviewed the model and recommended fairer risk-sharing and a way to renegotiate failing contracts.

  • InvITs and REITs — trusts registered under SEBI’s 2014 regulations that pool investors’ money into completed, income-generating infrastructure (InvITs) or commercial real estate (REITs), and must distribute at least 90% of their net distributable cash flows to unit-holders. They let a developer or a public body sell a stake in an operating asset and recycle the capital into new projects; the NHAI InvIT is one such vehicle for highways.
  • NaBFID — the National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development, a development finance institution created by its own Act in 2021 and regulated by the RBI.
  • NIIF — the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (2015), a fund manager in which the Government holds 49% and domestic and foreign institutional investors the rest, so that it can co-invest without being a government company.
  • Pipelines — the National Infrastructure Pipeline (2019) listed projects for 2020-25; the National Monetisation Pipeline (2021) set out brownfield central assets — roads, transmission lines, pipelines, stadiums — whose revenue rights would be leased to private operators for a period, with ownership staying with the Government and the asset returned at the end.
⚠️ Exam trap
Line the models up by who puts in the money: EPC — government 100%; HAM — government 40%, developer 60%; BOT — developer 100%; TOT — the asset already exists and the investor pays the government. In HAM and BOT-Annuity the government keeps the traffic risk; in BOT-Toll the developer carries it. And monetisation is not privatisation — the asset comes back.

Logistics, Energy and the Infrastructure Missions

Infrastructure was long planned ministry by ministry, so a new road could be dug up for a pipeline a year later. PM GatiShakti National Master Plan, launched on 13 October 2021, is a GIS-based digital platform on which the infrastructure ministries — sixteen at launch, including railways and road transport — plan together on one map. It names seven engines of growth: railways, roads, ports, waterways, airports, mass transport and logistics infrastructure. The National Logistics Policy of 17 September 2022 aims to bring India’s logistics cost down to global benchmarks and to place India among the top 25 of the World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index by 2030, with a Unified Logistics Interface Platform (ULIP) joining the data systems of different ministries; the Commerce Ministry ranks states on logistics through the annual LEADS (Logistics Ease Across Different States) report.

Transport programmes by design
ProgrammeModeDesign
Bharatmala Pariyojana (2017)RoadsEconomic corridors, feeder routes, border and coastal roads and expressways under one umbrella
Sagarmala (2015)Ports and coastPort-led development — port modernisation, port connectivity, port-linked industry and coastal communities
Dedicated Freight CorridorsRailSeparate freight-only lines (Eastern and Western corridors) built by DFCCIL, freeing the mixed network for passenger trains
National Waterways Act, 2016Inland waterDeclared 111 national waterways (the 5 existing plus 106 new), developed by the Inland Waterways Authority of India
UDAN (2016)AirRegional connectivity: airlines bid for under-served routes, with capped fares on part of the seats and viability gap funding for the operator

Electricity is on the Concurrent List, and the Electricity Act, 2003 is the framework: it delicensed generation, made transmission a separate activity and gave the Central and State Electricity Regulatory Commissions the job of setting tariffs. The chronic weak link has been the state distribution companies (DISCOMs), which lose money through theft, billing gaps and tariffs below cost. UDAY (2015) had states take over 75% of their DISCOMs’ debt in exchange for efficiency targets; the Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (2021) ties central funds to cutting losses and to smart prepaid metering. On access, DDUGJY (2014) electrified villages — every inhabited village was declared electrified in April 2018 — and Saubhagya (2017) connected households. PM Ujjwala Yojana (2016) gave LPG connections to women of poor households.

Clean-energy missions by design (India’s climate targets are in the chapter on pollution and climate)
MissionDesign
PM-KUSUM (2019)Solar for farmers in three components: small grid-connected renewable plants on barren or fallow land, standalone solar pumps, and solarisation of existing grid-connected pumps so farmers can sell surplus power
PM Surya Ghar: Muft Bijli Yojana (2024)Central subsidy for rooftop solar on homes, aimed at one crore households, with up to 300 units a month of free power
National Green Hydrogen Mission (2023)Green hydrogen made by electrolysis using renewable power; target of 5 million tonnes a year of production capacity by 2030, with incentives for electrolyser manufacture and production (the SIGHT programme)
Ethanol blendingThe National Policy on Biofuels, 2018, set a target of 20% ethanol in petrol; in 2022 the target year was advanced from 2030 to 2025-26
Strategic Petroleum ReservesUnderground crude-oil caverns at Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru and Padur, run by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Ltd, as a buffer against supply shocks

How much industry is producing is tracked by the Index of Industrial Production (IIP), compiled by the National Statistics Office, and, for the heaviest end of industry, by the Index of Eight Core Industries, compiled by the Office of the Economic Adviser in DPIIT: coal, crude oil, natural gas, refinery products, fertilisers, steel, cement and electricity. In the 2011-12 base series the eight carry about 40% of the weight of the IIP, and refinery products carry the largest single weight among them, followed by electricity and steel.

⚠️ Exam trap
Two scheme names that sound alike: PM-KUSUM is solar for farmers; PM Surya Ghar is rooftop solar for homes. And Ujjwala is cooking gas, not electricity — Saubhagya is the household electricity scheme. Also keep the compilers apart: IIP — NSO; eight core index and WPI — Office of the Economic Adviser, DPIIT.

Key takeaways

  • CACP (1965 as the Agricultural Prices Commission, renamed 1985; an attached office, not statutory) recommends MSP for 22 mandated crops; the CCEA decides. MSP is not a legal entitlement; only the sugarcane FRP (since 2009) has statutory force, under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.
  • FCI (1965, Food Corporations Act 1964) procures, stores, moves and holds buffers; DCP (1997-98) lets states procure themselves; PM-AASHA (2018) = PSS (physical procurement via NAFED) + PDPS (price difference paid for oilseeds) + private procurement pilot. PDS: RPDS 1992 → TPDS 1997 → AAY 2000 → NFSA 2013 → free grain from 2023.
  • KCC (1998; R. V. Gupta Committee; extended to animal husbandry and fisheries 2018-19); crop loans at 7% with a 3% prompt-repayment incentive = 4% effective. PMFBY (kharif 2016): farmer pays 2% kharif, 1.5% rabi, 5% commercial/horticultural; rest shared 50:50 (90:10 in NE and Himalayan states); voluntary for all since kharif 2020.
  • IPR 1948: four categories (State monopoly — arms, atomic energy, railways). IDRA 1951 = licensing. IPR 1956: three schedules — A 17, B 12, C the rest ("economic constitution"). MRTP 1969 → Competition Act 2002 (CCI). NIP 1991: licensing kept for 18 industries, public-sector list cut 17 → 8; for most of the period since 2001 only atomic energy and railway operations reserved.
  • MSMEs (MSMED Act 2006): from 1 July 2020 a composite test of investment and turnover, the same for manufacturing and services, exports excluded — micro ₹1 cr/₹5 cr, small ₹10 cr/₹50 cr, medium ₹50 cr/₹250 cr; raised from 1 April 2025 (investment ×2.5, turnover ×2). Udyam Registration; CGTMSE (2000); 45-day payment rule and s.43B(h); TReDS; PMEGP via KVIC.
  • Make in India (25 Sept 2014), nodal DPIIT (renamed 2019), four pillars — new processes, infrastructure, sectors, mindset. Jan Vishwas Act 2023 decriminalised 183 provisions in 42 Acts; Doing Business discontinued 2021. PLI (from 2020; 14 sectors) pays a share of incremental sales over a base year to firms meeting minimum investment — output-linked, not an input subsidy.
  • Models: EPC (govt pays all), BOT-Toll (developer pays and bears traffic risk), BOT-Annuity, HAM 2016 (govt 40% during construction, developer 60% repaid as annuities; NHAI keeps toll), TOT (upfront payment for an operating road), BOO (no transfer), Swiss challenge (unsolicited proposal, proponent may match). VGF 2006 (20% + 20%); Kelkar Committee 2015; InvITs (SEBI 2014, ≥90% distribution); NaBFID 2021; NIIF 2015 (govt 49%); NMP 2021 (ownership retained).
  • PM GatiShakti (13 Oct 2021): GIS platform, 16 ministries at launch, seven engines (railways, roads, ports, waterways, airports, mass transport, logistics infrastructure). National Logistics Policy (17 Sept 2022), ULIP, LEADS. Bharatmala 2017, Sagarmala 2015, DFCs, 111 national waterways (2016), UDAN 2016. Power: Electricity Act 2003, UDAY 2015, RDSS 2021, Saubhagya 2017, Ujjwala (LPG) 2016, PM-KUSUM 2019, PM Surya Ghar 2024, Green Hydrogen Mission 2023 (5 MMT by 2030), E20 advanced to 2025-26.

Practice questions (16)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Consider the following statements:
    1. The Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices recommends minimum support prices, but the final decision is taken by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs.
    2. The Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices is a statutory body constituted under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
    3. The Fair and Remunerative Price of sugarcane is fixed under an order issued under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: C — 1 and 3 only

    Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The CACP is an attached office of the agriculture ministry with no statute of its own, so statement 2 is wrong. The sugarcane FRP draws its force from the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, issued under the Essential Commodities Act — which is why the Act appears in the question at all.
  2. Under the Decentralised Procurement scheme for foodgrains:

    1. the Food Corporation of India alone procures grain in every state
    2. private traders are licensed to procure grain at the minimum support price
    3. farmers are paid the difference between the support price and the prevailing market price
    4. the state government procures and distributes grain itself, at the Centre’s cost
    Show answer

    Answer: D — the state government procures and distributes grain itself, at the Centre’s cost

    Under DCP, begun in 1997-98, the state itself procures, stores and distributes, with the Centre bearing the approved cost. The third option describes the Price Deficiency Payment Scheme under PM-AASHA, which applies to oilseeds and involves no procurement at all — a real scheme placed in the wrong box.
  3. Consider the following pairs:
    1. Price Support Scheme — physical procurement of pulses, oilseeds and copra by central nodal agencies
    2. Price Deficiency Payment Scheme — payment to oilseed farmers of the difference between the MSP and the market price
    3. Open Market Sale Scheme (Domestic) — a component of PM-AASHA for procuring wheat from farmers
    How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Only two

    Pairs 1 and 2 are correct components of PM-AASHA. The Open Market Sale Scheme works in the opposite direction: the FCI sells grain from central stocks into the market to cool prices, and it is not part of PM-AASHA. The trap is treating every grain-management scheme as a procurement scheme.
  4. With reference to the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana, consider the following statements:
    1. The farmer’s share of the premium for kharif foodgrain and oilseed crops is 2% of the sum insured.
    2. The farmer’s share of the premium for rabi foodgrain and oilseed crops is 1.5% of the sum insured.
    3. Since kharif 2020, enrolment has been voluntary for all farmers, including those with crop loans.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: D — 1, 2 and 3

    All three are correct. The farmer pays 2% for kharif, 1.5% for rabi and 5% for annual commercial and horticultural crops, and enrolment stopped being compulsory for loanee farmers from kharif 2020. Candidates who remember only that "rabi and kharif differ" often swap the two rates and reject a true statement.
  5. Under the interest subvention arrangement for short-term crop loans, a farmer who repays on time pays an effective annual interest rate of:

    1. 2%
    2. 4%
    3. 7%
    4. 9%
    Show answer

    Answer: B — 4%

    The loan carries 7% after the Centre’s subvention, and a further 3% prompt-repayment incentive brings the effective rate to 4%. Choosing 7% stops at the first step; the incentive is the part the question is testing.
  6. With reference to the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956, consider the following statements:
    1. Schedule A listed the industries whose future development would be the exclusive responsibility of the State.
    2. Schedule B listed industries that would be progressively State-owned, with private enterprise supplementing the effort of the State.
    3. The Resolution divided industries into four categories.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: A — 1 and 2 only

    Statements 1 and 2 are correct: Schedule A held 17 industries reserved to the State and Schedule B 12 mixed industries. Statement 3 belongs to the 1948 Resolution, which had four categories; the 1956 Resolution had three schedules, the third being everything left to private enterprise.
  7. For most of the period since 2001, which two activities have remained reserved for the public sector under India’s industrial policy?

    1. Atomic energy and railway operations
    2. Defence production and coal mining
    3. Railway operations and mineral oils
    4. Atomic energy and arms and ammunition
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Atomic energy and railway operations

    The 1991 policy cut the reserved list from 17 to 8, and later rounds left only atomic energy and railway operations. Defence production and arms were opened to private industry, coal mining was opened to commercial private mining, and mineral oils left the list early — each distractor was reserved at some earlier date, which is what makes it plausible.
  8. Which one of the following correctly describes the classification of micro, small and medium enterprises notified in 2020?

    1. Investment limits alone, set separately for manufacturing and service enterprises
    2. Turnover alone, including export turnover
    3. A composite test of investment and turnover, the same for manufacturing and services, with exports excluded from turnover
    4. Number of workers employed, with separate limits for rural and urban enterprises
    Show answer

    Answer: C — A composite test of investment and turnover, the same for manufacturing and services, with exports excluded from turnover

    Since 1 July 2020 an enterprise is classified by investment and turnover together, with one set of limits for both manufacturing and services, and export turnover is left out so that exporting does not push a firm into a higher class. The first option is the original 2006 scheme, which the 2020 notification replaced.
  9. Under the production-linked incentive schemes, the incentive paid to an eligible firm is primarily linked to:

    1. incremental sales over a base year
    2. the value of land acquired for a new plant
    3. the number of workers on the firm’s payroll
    4. customs duty forgone on imported components
    Show answer

    Answer: A — incremental sales over a base year

    A PLI pays a percentage of incremental sales of goods made in India above a base year, to firms that also meet a minimum-investment condition, for a fixed number of years. It is not a subsidy on land, labour or imported inputs; tying the reward to output is precisely what separates it from older capital-subsidy schemes.
  10. Consider the following pairs of infrastructure model and its feature:
    1. EPC — the government finances the entire project cost and the contractor builds it
    2. Hybrid Annuity Model — the government pays 40% of the project cost during construction
    3. BOT-Toll — the traffic risk is borne by the government
    4. TOT — an investor pays an upfront amount for the right to collect toll on an operational highway
    Which of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 3 and 4 only
    3. 1, 2 and 4 only
    4. 1, 2, 3 and 4
    Show answer

    Answer: C — 1, 2 and 4 only

    Pairs 1, 2 and 4 are correct. In BOT-Toll the developer finances the road and earns only what the toll brings in, so it is the developer who carries the traffic risk; the government keeps that risk under BOT-Annuity and HAM. Mixing up the two BOT variants is the trap here.
  11. In infrastructure procurement, the "Swiss challenge" method refers to:

    1. awarding a PPP project to whichever bidder asks for the smallest viability gap grant
    2. a foreign lender co-financing a project with a domestic development bank
    3. leasing the revenue rights of an existing public asset for a fixed term
    4. inviting rival bids on an unsolicited proposal, which the proponent may then match
    Show answer

    Answer: D — inviting rival bids on an unsolicited proposal, which the proponent may then match

    Under a Swiss challenge, a private party submits an unsolicited proposal, the authority opens it to competing bids, and the originator gets the right to match the best one. The first option describes how VGF projects are often bid, and the third describes asset monetisation — both real practices, neither a Swiss challenge.
  12. With reference to Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) in India, consider the following statements:
    1. They are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India.
    2. They must distribute at least 90% of their net distributable cash flows to unit-holders.
    3. They are permitted to invest only in projects that are still under construction.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 1 and 2 only
    3. 2 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: B — 1 and 2 only

    Statements 1 and 2 are correct: InvITs are governed by SEBI’s 2014 regulations and must pass on at least 90% of distributable cash. Statement 3 inverts their purpose — InvITs hold mainly completed, income-generating assets, which is how they let developers recycle capital into new construction.
  13. The Viability Gap Funding scheme of the Government of India provides:

    1. interest subvention on short-term loans to farmers
    2. a capital grant to PPP projects that are economically justified but fall short of financial viability
    3. a guarantee on collateral-free loans to micro and small enterprises
    4. loans to state distribution companies to clear their debt
    Show answer

    Answer: B — a capital grant to PPP projects that are economically justified but fall short of financial viability

    VGF, begun in 2006, is a grant of part of the capital cost — up to 20% from the Centre and up to 20% more from the sponsoring authority — for PPP projects whose revenues alone cannot attract investors. The guarantee option describes CGTMSE, a separate MSME instrument, and the DISCOM option recalls UDAY, under which states took over debt rather than lending.
  14. Which one of the following is NOT among the seven engines identified in the PM GatiShakti National Master Plan?

    1. Waterways
    2. Airports
    3. Mass transport
    4. Power grids
    Show answer

    Answer: D — Power grids

    The seven engines are railways, roads, ports, waterways, airports, mass transport and logistics infrastructure — all about moving people and goods. The power ministry does plan on the GatiShakti platform, which makes the option tempting, but power grids are not one of the seven engines.
  15. Consider the following pairs of scheme and its purpose:
    1. UDAY — financial turnaround of state power distribution companies
    2. Saubhagya — electricity connections to households
    3. PM-KUSUM — solar pumps and solar power for farmers
    4. PM Ujjwala Yojana — rooftop solar panels for poor households
    How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Only three

    Pairs 1, 2 and 3 are correct. Ujjwala gives LPG cooking-gas connections to women of poor households; rooftop solar for homes is PM Surya Ghar. Because Ujjwala means "bright", it is easy to attach it to an electricity or solar scheme.
  16. Arrange the following stages in the evolution of India’s food distribution system in chronological order:
    1. Antyodaya Anna Yojana
    2. Targeted Public Distribution System
    3. National Food Security Act
    4. Revamped Public Distribution System
    Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    1. 4 – 2 – 1 – 3
    2. 2 – 4 – 1 – 3
    3. 4 – 1 – 2 – 3
    4. 2 – 1 – 4 – 3
    Show answer

    Answer: A — 4 – 2 – 1 – 3

    The Revamped PDS came in 1992, the Targeted PDS in June 1997, the Antyodaya Anna Yojana in December 2000 as a sharper target within TPDS, and the National Food Security Act in 2013. The common error is to place Antyodaya before TPDS, though it was built inside the targeted system.