State & Local Government: Governor, Legislature, Panchayats, Municipalities & Union Territories

India is governed at three levels, and the Constitution writes each one differently. The state is a near-copy of the Union — a nominal head (the Governor), a real head (the Chief Minister), a legislature of one or two Houses and a High Court — but the copy has deliberate differences, and those differences are where questions are set: the Governor is appointed rather than elected, has discretion the President does not, and can reserve a state's bill for the Centre. The third tier — panchayats and municipalities — existed for decades only at the mercy of state law, until the 73rd and 74th Amendments (1992) wrote it into Parts IX and IX-A. Around these sit the places the ordinary pattern does not reach: Scheduled Areas under the Fifth Schedule, tribal areas of the North-East under the Sixth, and the Union Territories, of which Delhi is the most argued-over. The way to learn this chapter is comparatively — Governor against President, Council against Assembly, Part IX against Part IX-A, Fifth Schedule against Sixth — because almost every statement you will be asked to judge is true of one of a pair and false of the other.

The Governor: Office, Powers and the Pleasure of the President

The state executive is in Part VI, Chapter II (Articles 153–167). The Constituent Assembly debated an elected Governor and rejected it: an elected Governor would be a rival centre of power to an elected Chief Minister, and the parliamentary system cannot carry two mandates in one state. So the Governor is appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal (Article 155) — a choice that made the office a link between the Union and the state, and also the source of every later controversy about it.

The Governor, article by article
ArticleWhat it provides
153A Governor for each state; the 7th Amendment (1956) allowed one person to be Governor of two or more states
154Executive power of the state vested in the Governor, exercised directly or through subordinate officers
155–156Appointed by the President; term of five years, but holds office during the pleasure of the President; may resign by writing to the President
157–158Citizen, 35 years; not a member of any legislature, holds no office of profit; emoluments charged on the Consolidated Fund of the State; if he serves two states, the cost is shared between them in the proportion the President fixes
159Oath administered by the Chief Justice of the High Court of that state (or, in his absence, the senior-most judge available)
161Pardon, reprieve, respite, remission, suspension or commutation for offences against a law on a matter within the state's executive power
163–164Council of Ministers headed by the CM to aid and advise him, except where he is required to act in his discretion; appoints the CM and, on the CM's advice, the other ministers
213Ordinance when the legislature (or either House) is not in session — the state twin of Article 123
  • Executive: appoints the CM, ministers, the Advocate General (Art 165), the State Election Commissioner and the chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission (though only the President can remove the last); can seek information from the CM (Art 167); can recommend President's Rule (Art 356).
  • Legislative: summons, prorogues and dissolves the Assembly (Art 174); addresses the first session each year (Art 176); nominates one-sixth of the Legislative Council (Art 171); decides on disqualification of a member under Article 191 acting on the opinion of the Election Commission (Art 192); assents to, returns or reserves bills (Art 200).
  • Financial: the budget is laid in his name (Art 202); a Money Bill needs his prior recommendation (Art 207); the Contingency Fund of the State is at his disposal (Art 267); constitutes the State Finance Commission every five years (Arts 243-I, 243Y).
  • Judicial: pardoning power (Art 161); consulted by the President when High Court judges are appointed (Art 217); appoints district judges in consultation with the High Court (Art 233).
⚠️ Three places where the Governor is weaker than the President
(1) Court martial: only the President can pardon a sentence by a court martial; the Governor has no such power. (2) No impeachment, but no security either: the President can be removed only by impeachment (Art 61); the Governor has no removal procedure at all and can be recalled at the President's pleasure. (3) Ordinances on reserved subjects: under Article 213 the Governor cannot promulgate, without the President's instructions, an ordinance whose provisions would have needed the President's previous sanction or reservation as a bill. The Supreme Court has also held, in D.C. Wadhwa (1987) and Krishna Kumar Singh (2017), that re-promulgating ordinances without placing them before the legislature is a fraud on the Constitution.
💡 Think of it like this
Think of the Governor as a hinge, not a wheel. A wheel drives the vehicle — that is the Chief Minister's job. A hinge joins two parts so that they can move together, and it is noticed only when it creaks. In normal times the Governor signs what the ministry advises; the Constitution's design only shows when a state's government is in doubt, or when a bill touches the Union.

Discretion, Assent and the Cases that Drew the Lines

Article 163(1) says the Council of Ministers aids and advises the Governor "except in so far as he is by or under this Constitution required to exercise his functions … in his discretion", and Article 163(2) makes his decision on whether a matter is discretionary final. The President has no equivalent clause. But the Supreme Court has read the clause narrowly: discretion exists where the Constitution expressly gives it, or where a situation leaves no ministry whose advice can bind him — not wherever a Governor disagrees.

Two kinds of discretion
Constitutional discretion (written into the text)Situational discretion (arising from circumstances)
Reserving a bill for the President's consideration (Art 200)Appointing a CM when no party has a clear majority, or when a sitting CM dies with no obvious successor
Recommending President's Rule — his report under Art 356Dismissing a ministry that has lost the confidence of the Assembly but will not resign
Acting as Administrator of an adjoining Union Territory (Art 239(2)), independently of his own ministryDeciding on dissolution when the advising ministry has itself lost its majority
Fixing the share of mining royalties payable to autonomous district councils (Sixth Schedule) in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram—
Special responsibilities under Article 371 — e.g. development boards in Maharashtra and Gujarat (371(2)), law and order in Nagaland (371A) and Arunachal Pradesh (371H)—

Article 200 gives the Governor four options on a bill: assent, withhold assent, return it with a message for reconsideration (not a Money Bill), or reserve it for the President. If the legislature passes a returned bill again, with or without changes, he shall not withhold assent on the second round. One reservation is compulsory: a bill that would derogate from the powers of the High Court. Under Article 201 the President may assent or withhold; for a non-money bill he may direct the Governor to return it, and the legislature must reconsider it within six months. Whether there is any time limit on the Governor's own decision has been litigated in recent years; what is settled is that Article 200 does not contemplate keeping a bill pending indefinitely.

The Governor in the Supreme Court
CaseWhat it settled
Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974)Seven judges: the President and the Governor are constitutional heads who act on ministerial advice, save in the few situations where the Constitution requires otherwise
S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)A ministry's majority is tested on the floor of the House, not in the Governor's residence; a report under Art 356 is open to judicial review
Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006)Dissolving a newly elected Assembly in 2005, before it ever met, on a mere apprehension of horse-trading was unconstitutional
B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010)The President's pleasure under Art 156 needs no stated cause, but cannot be exercised arbitrarily; a Governor cannot be removed merely because a new government at the Centre dislikes him or his views differ from its policies
Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016)A Governor cannot summon or advance a session of the Assembly on his own, against the advice of the ministry; Article 163 confers no general discretion
🎯 Why it matters
Both great review commissions wanted the office depoliticised. The Sarkaria Commission (1988) said a Governor should be an eminent person from outside the state, not recently active in politics, chosen after consulting the Chief Minister. The Punchhi Commission (2010) added a fixed five-year tenure and removal only by a resolution of the state legislature. Neither has been written into the Constitution, which is why the cases above carry so much weight.

Chief Minister, Council of Ministers and the State Legislature

Under Article 164 the Governor appoints the Chief Minister and, on his advice, the other ministers, who hold office during the Governor's pleasure — which in practice means as long as the Assembly's confidence lasts, because the Council is collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly (Art 164(2)), never to the Council. The CM may come from either House. A non-member may be made a minister but must win a seat within six months (Art 164(4)); in S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab (2001) the Court held that such a person cannot be re-appointed after the six months lapse, during the same Assembly, without first getting elected.

  • Size (Art 164(1A), 91st Amendment, 2003): ministers including the CM may not exceed 15% of the Assembly's total strength, and may not be fewer than 12.
  • Tribal welfare minister (proviso to Art 164(1)): compulsory in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Odisha. The 94th Amendment (2006) brought in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand and dropped the state from which Jharkhand had been carved.
  • Duties of the CM (Art 167): to communicate all decisions of the Council to the Governor, to furnish information he asks for, and to place before the Council any matter on which one minister decided alone if the Governor so requires.

The state legislature (Arts 168–212) is the Governor plus one House or two. Six states have a Legislative Council: Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Telangana and Uttar Pradesh. Under Article 169, Parliament creates or abolishes a Council by an ordinary law, but only after the state Assembly passes a resolution by a majority of its total membership and two-thirds of those present and voting; such a law is expressly not deemed an amendment of the Constitution for Article 368. Councils have come and gone this way — Andhra Pradesh abolished its Council in 1985 and revived it in 2007; Tamil Nadu abolished its Council in 1986.

Assembly against Council
PointLegislative AssemblyLegislative Council
SizeNot more than 500, not less than 60 (Art 170); smaller states such as Sikkim, Goa and Mizoram have fewer under special provisionsNot more than one-third of the Assembly, not less than 40 (Art 171)
Chosen byDirect election from territorial constituencies1/3 by local bodies, 1/3 by MLAs, 1/12 by graduates, 1/12 by teachers, 1/6 nominated by the Governor
DurationFive years unless dissolved earlierPermanent; one-third retire every second year
Ordinary bill from the AssemblyPrevails in the endCan delay three months, then one month when the Assembly passes it again (Art 197) — four months at most
Money BillIntroduced only hereRecommendations within 14 days, which the Assembly may ignore (Art 198)
⚠️ The bill that dies
Article 197 protects only bills that originate in the Assembly. A bill that originates in the Council and is rejected by the Assembly simply ends — there is no second round and, unlike Parliament, no joint sitting at the state level in any case. So the Council is a revising chamber that can be overruled, never a co-equal one, which is exactly why Article 169 lets a state get rid of it.

High Courts in the State Frame

High Courts sit in Part VI, Chapter V (Articles 214–231) — in the part on the states, but they are not state institutions in the way a ministry is. Their judges are appointed by the President, removed only by Parliament's address, and transferred by the President; the state pays their salaries, but their pensions are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India. India has 25 High Courts, so several serve more than one state or Union Territory.

  • Appointment (Art 217): by the President after consulting the Chief Justice of India, the Governor and — for judges other than the Chief Justice — the Chief Justice of that High Court. Qualification: citizen with ten years in judicial office or ten years as an advocate of a High Court. No minimum age; retirement at 62.
  • Oath (Art 219): before the Governor, or a person he appoints. Transfer (Art 222): by the President after consulting the Chief Justice of India.
  • After retirement (Art 220): a permanent judge may not plead in the High Court where he served, but may practise in the Supreme Court and in other High Courts.
  • Additional and acting judges (Art 224) for up to two years; retired judges may be asked to sit by the Chief Justice of the High Court with the President's consent (Art 224A).
  • Superintendence (Art 227): over every court and tribunal in its territory, except military tribunals. Writs (Art 226): for Fundamental Rights "and for any other purpose" — wider than Article 32.
  • Common High Court (Art 231) for two or more states, introduced by the 7th Amendment (1956); Parliament may extend or exclude a High Court's jurisdiction over a Union Territory (Art 230).
High Courts that serve more than one unit
High CourtJurisdiction
BombayMaharashtra, Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
GauhatiAssam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh
Punjab and HaryanaPunjab, Haryana, Chandigarh
CalcuttaWest Bengal, Andaman and Nicobar Islands
MadrasTamil Nadu, Puducherry
KeralaKerala, Lakshadweep
Jammu & Kashmir and LadakhThe two Union Territories
🧠 Memory trick
Who does what to a High Court judge: "President appoints, transfers and removes; Governor swears in; state pays the salary; Union pays the pension." The only state functionary in the chain is the Governor, and only for consultation and the oath.

Panchayati Raj: From Article 40 to the 73rd Amendment

The original Constitution mentioned village panchayats only once, as a Directive Principle (Article 40) — the state shall take steps to organise them. Forty years of committees then tried to answer the same question: how do you make rural development something villagers do rather than something done to them? Each committee is remembered by one structural idea, and that idea is what gets asked.

The long road to Part IX
  1. 1952–53
    Community Development Programme (2 October 1952) and the National Extension Service (1953) — development run by officials, with little popular participation.
  2. 1957
    Balwantrai Mehta Committee reports that the programmes failed for want of people's institutions; recommends "democratic decentralisation". The National Development Council accepts it in January 1958.
  3. 2 October 1959
    Rajasthan becomes the first state to establish Panchayati Raj, at Nagaur; Andhra Pradesh follows the same year.
  4. 1977–78
    Ashok Mehta Committee (appointed December 1977, reported August 1978 with 132 recommendations) proposes a two-tier system.
  5. 1985–86
    G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985) and L.M. Singhvi Committee (1986).
  6. 1989
    The 64th Amendment Bill passes the Lok Sabha but is defeated in the Rajya Sabha; a 1990 bill lapses with the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
  7. 1992–93
    The 73rd and 74th Amendment Acts, 1992 are passed; the 73rd comes into force on 24 April 1993 (now observed as National Panchayati Raj Day) and the 74th on 1 June 1993.
The four committees and their one big idea
CommitteeCore recommendationAlso remembered for
Balwantrai Mehta (1957)Three tiers — gram panchayat (village), panchayat samiti (block), zila parishad (district) — linked by indirect electionsPanchayat samiti as the executive body; zila parishad advisory and supervisory, chaired by the Collector
Ashok Mehta (1978)Two tiers — zila parishad and mandal panchayat (a group of villages with 15,000–20,000 people)District as the first point of decentralisation below the state; open participation of political parties; compulsory taxation powers; constitutional recognition
G.V.K. Rao (1985)Development had been bureaucratised and PRIs reduced to "grass without roots"; make the zila parishad pivotalA District Development Commissioner as the chief executive of the zila parishad; regular elections
L.M. Singhvi (1986)Constitutional recognition and protection of local self-government, with a separate chapter in the ConstitutionNyaya panchayats for a cluster of villages; reorganisation of villages into viable units; more finances
🧠 Memory trick
Count the tiers by the committee's initials: Balwantrai — Block (three tiers with the block in the middle); Ashok — Abolish the block (two tiers with the mandal); Rao — Roots ("grass without roots"); Singhvi — Statute of the Constitution (constitutional status, nyaya panchayats).

The 73rd Amendment: Part IX, Article by Article

The 73rd Amendment added Part IX ("The Panchayats", Articles 243 to 243-O) and the Eleventh Schedule of 29 subjects. It did not create panchayats — local government stays a State List subject (entry 5) — but it obliged every state to create them on a common pattern and took away a state's freedom to postpone their elections indefinitely.

Part IX — the articles that are asked
ArticleProvision
243AGram Sabha — all persons on the electoral rolls of a village; its powers are whatever state law gives
243BPanchayats at village, intermediate and district levels; a state with population not exceeding 20 lakh may skip the intermediate level
243CAll seats filled by direct election; chairpersons at intermediate and district levels elected by and from the elected members; the village chairperson as state law provides
243DSC/ST seats in proportion to population; not less than one-third of all seats and of chairpersons' posts for women (including SC/ST women), by rotation; backward-class reservation left to the state
243EFive-year term from the first meeting; election before expiry, or within six months of a dissolution (unless less than six months of the term remain)
243FDisqualifications as for the state legislature, but nobody is disqualified for being under 25 if he has attained 21
243G–243HPowers and responsibilities, including the Eleventh Schedule; taxes, duties, tolls and fees the state may authorise
243-IState Finance Commission — constituted by the Governor within a year of the amendment and then every five years
243KState Election Commission — appointed by the Governor; removable only like a High Court judge
243MPart IX does not apply to Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, the Scheduled and tribal areas, the hill areas of Manipur with district councils, and Darjeeling district (for the hill council); Parliament may extend it to Scheduled Areas by law
243-OCourts barred from questioning delimitation or seat allotment; an election can be challenged only by election petition
What a state must do, and what it may do
CompulsoryVoluntary (state's choice)
Gram Sabha in every villageGiving MPs and MLAs representation in panchayats
Three tiers (except states up to 20 lakh)Reservation for backward classes
Direct election of members at all levels; indirect election of intermediate and district chairpersonsHow the village panchayat chairperson is elected
Minimum age 21; SC/ST reservation; one-third for womenDevolving the Eleventh Schedule subjects
Five-year term; election within six months of dissolutionGranting taxing powers and grants-in-aid
State Election Commission and State Finance CommissionReserving more than one-third for women (many states now give one-half)

The Eleventh Schedule reads like a list of everything a village actually needs: agriculture and land improvement, minor irrigation, animal husbandry, fisheries, social forestry, minor forest produce, small-scale and village industries, rural housing, drinking water, fuel and fodder, roads, rural electrification, non-conventional energy, poverty alleviation, education including primary and secondary schools, technical training and adult education, libraries, cultural activities, markets and fairs, health and sanitation, family welfare, women and child development, social welfare, welfare of weaker sections, the public distribution system and maintenance of community assets. The amendment also inserted Article 280(3)(bb), so that the Union Finance Commission recommends measures to augment a state's Consolidated Fund to supplement panchayat resources on the basis of the State Finance Commission's recommendations.

⚠️ Two commissions that are not the national ones
The State Election Commission is not a branch of the Election Commission of India — the ECI has no role in panchayat or municipal polls. In Kishansing Tomar (2006) the Supreme Court held that the SEC must ensure elections are held on time and the state cannot plead its own unpreparedness, and in State of Goa v. Fouziya Imtiaz Shaikh (2021) that a State Election Commissioner must be an independent person, not a serving government official. Likewise the State Finance Commission is the Governor's body under Article 243-I, not a wing of the Finance Commission under Article 280.

The 74th Amendment: Municipalities under Part IX-A

The 74th Amendment added Part IX-A ("The Municipalities", Articles 243P to 243ZG) and the Twelfth Schedule of 18 subjects. It copies Part IX wherever it can — direct election, one-third for women, a five-year term, the State Election Commission and the State Finance Commission — and adds what a town needs and a village does not: planning committees and ward committees.

  • Three kinds of municipality (Art 243Q): a Nagar Panchayat for an area in transition from rural to urban, a Municipal Council for a smaller urban area, and a Municipal Corporation for a larger one. The Governor classifies an area by population, density, revenue, share of non-agricultural employment and economic importance. An industrial township whose services are provided by an industrial establishment may be left without a municipality.
  • Wards Committees (Art 243S): compulsory in a municipality with a population of three lakh or more.
  • District Planning Committee (Art 243ZD): in every district, to consolidate the plans of panchayats and municipalities into a draft district plan; not less than four-fifths of its members are elected by and from the elected members of the district panchayat and the municipalities, in proportion to the rural and urban population.
  • Metropolitan Planning Committee (Art 243ZE): in every metropolitan area — population of ten lakh or more; not less than two-thirds of its members are elected by the elected members of the municipalities and the chairpersons of panchayats in the area.
  • Twelfth Schedule: urban and town planning, regulation of land use and buildings, planning for economic and social development, roads and bridges, water supply, public health and solid-waste management, fire services, urban forestry and environment, weaker sections including the disabled, slum improvement, urban poverty alleviation, parks and playgrounds, cultural and educational aspects, burial and cremation grounds, cattle pounds and prevention of cruelty to animals, registration of births and deaths, public amenities such as street lighting and bus stops, and regulation of slaughter houses and tanneries.
Part IX against Part IX-A
FeaturePanchayats (Part IX)Municipalities (Part IX-A)
Articles243 – 243-O243P – 243ZG
ScheduleEleventh — 29 subjectsTwelfth — 18 subjects
UnitsVillage, intermediate, district tiersNagar panchayat, municipal council, municipal corporation — three types, not tiers
Grassroots bodyGram Sabha (243A)Wards Committees where population is 3 lakh or more (243S)
Planning—District Planning Committee (243ZD), Metropolitan Planning Committee (243ZE)
CommissionsSFC 243-I, SEC 243KSFC 243Y, SEC 243ZA — the same commissions
🎯 Backward-class seats: the triple test
Because Articles 243D(6) and 243T(6) only enable backward-class reservation, the Supreme Court has set conditions on it. In K. Krishna Murthy (2010) it upheld such reservation but said political backwardness in local bodies is different from educational and social backwardness. In Vikas Kishanrao Gawali (2021) it laid down the triple test: (1) a dedicated commission to inquire into the nature of backwardness in local bodies, (2) reservation specified local body by local body on that basis, and (3) total SC, ST and backward-class reservation not exceeding 50%.

PESA, the Fifth Schedule and the Sixth Schedule

Article 244 sets up two separate regimes for tribal India. Article 244(1) and the Fifth Schedule govern Scheduled Areas in any state other than Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram; Article 244(2) and the Sixth Schedule govern the tribal areas of those four states. The design difference is the whole story: the Fifth Schedule keeps power with the Governor and the state government, guided by an advisory council; the Sixth Schedule gives legislative, judicial and fiscal autonomy to elected autonomous district councils.

Fifth Schedule against Sixth Schedule
PointFifth Schedule (Art 244(1))Sixth Schedule (Art 244(2))
WhereScheduled Areas in ten states — Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, TelanganaTribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram — ten autonomous district councils
Who declares the areaThe President, by order, and may alter it after consulting the GovernorListed in the Schedule; the Governor may create, divide or alter autonomous districts and regions
Key bodyTribes Advisory Council — up to 20 members, about three-fourths being ST members of the state Assembly; advisory onlyDistrict council of up to 30 members, not more than four nominated by the Governor and the rest elected by adult franchise; five-year term
Law-makingThe Governor may direct that an Act of Parliament or of the state not apply, or apply with changes, and may make regulations on land transfer, land allotment and money-lending — with the President's assentCouncils make laws on land, forests other than reserved forests, shifting cultivation, village administration, inheritance, marriage and social customs — with the Governor's assent; they also run village courts and collect certain taxes
ReportingGovernor reports to the President annually or when required; the Union may give directionsGovernor may appoint a commission to examine a council's working and may dissolve it on that commission's report

Because Article 243M kept Part IX out of Scheduled Areas, Parliament passed the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 — PESA (24 December 1996), on the recommendations of the Dilip Singh Bhuria Committee. It extends Part IX to the Fifth Schedule areas of the ten states, with modifications that put the Gram Sabha at the centre: state laws must respect customary law, social and religious practices and traditional management of community resources.

  • The Gram Sabha approves plans and identifies beneficiaries of poverty-alleviation programmes, and the panchayat must obtain its certificate of utilisation of funds.
  • It must be consulted before land acquisition for development projects and before resettlement of affected people.
  • It gets ownership of minor forest produce, a say in licences and leases for minor minerals, and power to prevent land alienation, control money-lending, manage village markets and regulate the sale of intoxicants.
  • Reservation for Scheduled Tribes is not less than one-half of the seats, and all chairpersons' posts at every level are reserved for STs.
⚠️ Exam trap
PESA is about the Fifth Schedule, never the Sixth. The four north-eastern states of the Sixth Schedule have their own autonomous councils and are outside both Part IX and PESA. Two more amendments-proof facts: Parliament can amend either Schedule by ordinary law, and such a law is not deemed a constitutional amendment under Article 368; and Article 244A (22nd Amendment, 1969) lets Parliament create an autonomous state within Assam for certain tribal areas.

Union Territories and the Special Case of Delhi

Union Territories are governed by Part VIII (Articles 239–241). The basic rule is in Article 239: every UT is administered by the President acting through an Administrator with whatever designation he chooses — Lieutenant Governor, Administrator or Chief Commissioner. If the Governor of an adjoining state is made the Administrator, he acts independently of his own Council of Ministers. There are eight UTs: Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu (merged from 26 January 2020), Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh (both created on 31 October 2019), Lakshadweep and Puducherry. Three have elected legislatures: Delhi, Puducherry and Jammu and Kashmir.

Part VIII in five articles
ArticleProvision
239Administration by the President through an Administrator
239A(14th Amendment, 1962) Parliament may create a legislature and/or council of ministers for certain UTs — today Puducherry; the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 applies the same model to Jammu and Kashmir
239AA(69th Amendment, 1991) Special provisions for the National Capital Territory of Delhi
239ABThe President may suspend Article 239AA on the Lieutenant Governor's report of a failure of constitutional machinery
240The President may make regulations for the peace, progress and good government of UTs such as the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep, with the force of an Act of Parliament
241Parliament may constitute a High Court for a UT; Delhi is the only UT with a High Court of its own (since 1966)

Delhi's scheme came from the Balakrishnan Committee and was written in by the 69th Amendment (1991), in force from 1 February 1992. Under Article 239AA Delhi has a Lieutenant Governor, an elected Legislative Assembly that may legislate on State List and Concurrent List matters except public order, police and land, and a Council of Ministers headed by a Chief Minister, not exceeding 10% of the Assembly's strength, collectively responsible to the Assembly. The CM is appointed by the President, not the LG. Parliament's laws prevail over Delhi's, and if the LG and a minister differ, the LG refers the matter to the President, acting meanwhile if the matter is urgent. The 106th Amendment (2023) extended one-third reservation for women to the Delhi Assembly as well.

Delhi's position, as the courts and Parliament have defined it
  1. 2018
    A Constitution Bench holds that Delhi is not a state, but that the LG is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers on matters within the Assembly's competence, and the reference to the President is for exceptional cases, not every difference.
  2. May 2023
    A Constitution Bench holds that the elected government controls "services" in Delhi, except those linked to public order, police and land.
  3. August 2023
    Parliament passes the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2023, creating a National Capital Civil Service Authority — the CM, the Chief Secretary and the Principal Home Secretary — to recommend transfers and postings, with the LG having the final say.
🧠 Memory trick
Delhi's three exclusions are "P-P-L" — Public order, Police, Land (State List entries 1, 2 and 18). Delhi's two tens: ministers capped at 10% of the House, and the CM appointed by the President — the one person in Delhi's government whom the LG does not appoint.

Key takeaways

  • Governor (Arts 153–167): appointed by the President (Art 155), holds office at the President's pleasure (Art 156), age 35, oath by the High Court Chief Justice (Art 159); one person may serve two or more states (7th Amendment), with the cost shared as the President decides. He cannot pardon a court-martial sentence.
  • Discretion (Art 163): constitutional — reserving bills (Art 200), the Art 356 report, adjoining-UT administration, Sixth Schedule royalties, Article 371 duties; situational — hung Assembly, a ministry that has lost confidence. Shamsher Singh (1974) — constitutional head; Bommai (1994) — floor test; B.P. Singhal (2010) — no arbitrary removal; Nabam Rebia (2016) — no discretionary summoning.
  • CM and ministers (Art 164): responsible to the Assembly only; size 15%, minimum 12 (91st Amendment); non-member must be elected within six months and cannot be re-appointed without election (S.R. Chaudhuri, 2001). Tribal welfare minister compulsory in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, MP and Odisha (94th Amendment).
  • Legislature: six states have Councils; Parliament creates or abolishes one by ordinary law under Art 169 after the Assembly's special-majority resolution. Council = at most 1/3 of the Assembly, at least 40; delays an Assembly bill 3 + 1 months, a Money Bill 14 days; a Council-originated bill rejected by the Assembly dies; no joint sitting.
  • High Courts: 25 in all; appointed and transferred by the President, oath before the Governor, retire at 62, may later practise in the Supreme Court and other High Courts; pensions on the Consolidated Fund of India; common High Court under Art 231; Delhi is the only UT with its own High Court.
  • Committees: Balwantrai Mehta (1957) — three tiers, block samiti; Rajasthan first (Nagaur, 2 October 1959). Ashok Mehta (1978) — two tiers, mandal panchayat, party participation. G.V.K. Rao (1985) — "grass without roots". L.M. Singhvi (1986) — constitutional status, nyaya panchayats.
  • 73rd (Part IX, 243–243-O, Eleventh Schedule, 29 subjects) and 74th (Part IX-A, 243P–243ZG, Twelfth Schedule, 18 subjects): age 21, one-third women, five-year term, re-election within six months, SEC (243K/243ZA) removable like a High Court judge, SFC (243-I/243Y) every five years; Wards Committees at 3 lakh, DPC four-fifths elected, MPC at 10 lakh with two-thirds elected. Backward-class seats need the triple test (2021).
  • PESA 1996 (Bhuria Committee) extends Part IX to Fifth Schedule areas in ten states — Gram Sabha consent and control over minor forest produce, minor minerals, land alienation and money-lending; ST seats at least half and all chairpersons ST. Sixth Schedule: Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram; ten district councils of up to 30 (four nominated). UTs: eight; Delhi (Art 239AA, 69th Amendment) — no power over public order, police and land; ministers ≤ 10%.

Practice questions (17)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Consider the following statements about the Governor of a State:
    1. He is appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal.
    2. The oath of office is administered to him by the Chief Justice of the High Court of that State.
    3. When the same person is appointed Governor of two States, his emoluments are paid entirely out of the Consolidated Fund of India.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 1 and 2 only
    3. 2 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: B — 1 and 2 only

    Statements 1 (Art 155) and 2 (Art 159) are correct. Statement 3 is the trap: a Governor's emoluments are charged on the Consolidated Fund of the State, and when he serves two States the cost is shared between those States in the proportion the President determines (Art 158(3A)) — the Union does not pay it.
  2. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that although the President's pleasure under Article 156 requires no reason to be stated, a Governor cannot be removed arbitrarily or merely because his views do not accord with the policies of the Union Government?

    1. B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010)
    2. Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974)
    3. Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006)
    4. Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker (2016)
    Show answer

    Answer: A — B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010)

    B.P. Singhal (2010) dealt with the removal of Governors after a change of government at the Centre and held that the pleasure doctrine cannot be used arbitrarily. Nabam Rebia (2016) is the tempting wrong choice because it also limits the Governor, but it concerned his power to summon the Assembly, not his own removal.
  3. Consider the following statements:
    1. A Governor may reserve a bill passed by the State Legislature for the consideration of the President.
    2. A Governor may pardon a sentence passed by a court martial.
    3. A Governor cannot, on his own and against the advice of the Council of Ministers, advance the session of the Legislative Assembly.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Only two

    Statement 1 is correct — reservation under Article 200 is a constitutional discretion. Statement 3 is correct — Nabam Rebia (2016) held that summoning or advancing a session must follow ministerial advice. Statement 2 is wrong: only the President can pardon a court-martial sentence (Art 72); Article 161 gives the Governor no such power.
  4. Which one of the following correctly describes a law made by Parliament under Article 169 to abolish the Legislative Council of a State?

    1. It is a constitutional amendment that must be ratified by half the States
    2. It is passed by each House of Parliament by a special majority under Article 368
    3. It is an order of the President issued on the recommendation of the Governor
    4. It is an ordinary law, not deemed an amendment under Article 368
    Show answer

    Answer: D — It is an ordinary law, not deemed an amendment under Article 368

    Article 169 lets Parliament abolish or create a Council by ordinary law once the Assembly passes a resolution by a majority of its total membership and two-thirds of those present and voting; the Article itself says such a law is not an amendment for Article 368. The special-majority option confuses the State Assembly's resolution with Parliament's own vote, which needs only a simple majority.
  5. An ordinary bill passed by the Legislative Assembly of a bicameral State is sent to the Legislative Council. For how long, at the most, can the Council hold it up?

    1. Fourteen days in all
    2. Six months, after which a joint sitting is held
    3. Indefinitely, since its consent is essential
    4. Three months, then one month if passed again
    Show answer

    Answer: D — Three months, then one month if passed again

    Under Article 197 the Council can delay an Assembly bill for three months, and when the Assembly passes it again, for one more month — four months in all, after which the bill is deemed passed. Fourteen days is the limit for a Money Bill (Art 198), and the joint-sitting option is a Parliament rule that has no counterpart in the States.
  6. Consider the following statements about High Courts:
    1. Parliament may by law establish a common High Court for two or more States.
    2. A person who has held office as a permanent judge of a High Court cannot plead before any court in India after retirement.
    3. The pensions of High Court judges are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: C — 1 and 3 only

    Statement 1 is Article 231, added by the 7th Amendment, and statement 3 is correct because pensions are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India even though salaries come from the State. Statement 2 overstates Article 220: a retired permanent judge is barred only from the High Court where he served and may practise in the Supreme Court and other High Courts.
  7. A person who is not a member of the State Legislature is appointed a minister. Which one of the following is correct?

    1. He must become a member within six months, and cannot be re-appointed in the same Assembly without being elected
    2. He may continue as long as the Chief Minister retains confidence in him
    3. He must be nominated to the Legislative Council within three months
    4. He may hold office for one year, extendable once by the Governor
    Show answer

    Answer: A — He must become a member within six months, and cannot be re-appointed in the same Assembly without being elected

    Article 164(4) gives a non-member six months to win a seat, and S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab (2001) held that he cannot be re-appointed after that period, during the same Assembly, without first being elected. Nomination to the Council is not a route the Constitution prescribes, and there is no one-year term or extension.
  8. Consider the following pairs:
    Committee — Recommendation
    1. Balwantrai Mehta Committee — Three-tier system with the zila parishad as an advisory and supervisory body
    2. Ashok Mehta Committee — Mandal panchayats covering a group of villages
    3. G.V.K. Rao Committee — Nyaya panchayats for a cluster of villages
    4. L.M. Singhvi Committee — Constitutional recognition of local self-government
    How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. Only three
    4. All four
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Only three

    Pairs 1, 2 and 4 are correct. Pair 3 is wrong: nyaya panchayats for a cluster of villages were an L.M. Singhvi recommendation, while the G.V.K. Rao Committee is remembered for calling PRIs "grass without roots" and for making the zila parishad pivotal.
  9. With reference to Part IX of the Constitution, consider the following statements:
    1. The minimum age for election to a panchayat is 21 years.
    2. A State with a population not exceeding 20 lakh may not constitute panchayats at the intermediate level.
    3. Reservation of seats for backward classes in panchayats is mandatory under Article 243D.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 2 only
    3. 1 and 3 only
    4. 1, 2 and 3
    Show answer

    Answer: A — 1 and 2 only

    Statements 1 (Art 243F) and 2 (Art 243B) are correct. Statement 3 is wrong: Article 243D makes SC/ST and women's reservation compulsory but only enables a State to reserve seats for backward classes, which is why the triple test of 2021 applies to such seats.
  10. Consider the following statements:
    1. The State Finance Commission is constituted by the Governor every five years.
    2. The Finance Commission under Article 280 recommends measures to augment the Consolidated Fund of a State to supplement the resources of panchayats, on the basis of the State Finance Commission's recommendations.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 only
    3. Both 1 and 2
    4. Neither 1 nor 2
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Both 1 and 2

    Both are correct. Article 243-I makes the Governor constitute the State Finance Commission every five years, and the 73rd Amendment inserted Article 280(3)(bb), linking the Union Finance Commission's recommendations to the State Finance Commission's. The trap is to assume the two commissions are unconnected, or that the Union body appoints the State one.
  11. Under Part IX-A of the Constitution, Wards Committees must be constituted within the territorial area of a municipality having a population of:

    1. one lakh or more
    2. three lakh or more
    3. five lakh or more
    4. ten lakh or more
    Show answer

    Answer: B — three lakh or more

    Article 243S requires Wards Committees in municipalities with a population of three lakh or more. Ten lakh is the tempting distractor because it is the figure that defines a metropolitan area for a Metropolitan Planning Committee under Article 243ZE.
  12. Consider the following statements:
    1. A District Planning Committee consolidates the plans prepared by the panchayats and the municipalities in the district.
    2. Not less than four-fifths of the members of a District Planning Committee are elected by and from the elected members of the district panchayat and the municipalities.
    3. A Metropolitan Planning Committee is constituted in every area having a population of five lakh or more.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Only two

    Statements 1 and 2 describe Article 243ZD correctly. Statement 3 is wrong: a metropolitan area under Article 243ZE has a population of ten lakh or more, and two-thirds of its planning committee are elected — five lakh appears nowhere in Part IX-A.
  13. With reference to the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, consider the following statements:
    1. It extends the provisions of Part IX to the Scheduled Areas under the Fifth Schedule.
    2. The offices of chairpersons of panchayats at all levels are reserved for Scheduled Tribes.
    3. It applies to the tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. 2 and 3 only
    3. 1, 2 and 3
    4. 1 and 2 only
    Show answer

    Answer: D — 1 and 2 only

    Statements 1 and 2 are correct: PESA extends Part IX to Fifth Schedule areas, reserves at least half the seats and all chairpersons' posts for Scheduled Tribes. Statement 3 confuses the two Schedules — the four north-eastern States are governed by the Sixth Schedule and its autonomous district councils, which PESA does not touch.
  14. Under the Fifth Schedule, a Tribes Advisory Council consists of not more than twenty members, of whom, as nearly as may be, three-fourths are:

    1. tribal leaders nominated by the President
    2. members of the autonomous district councils
    3. officers of the State tribal welfare department
    4. Scheduled Tribe members of the State Assembly
    Show answer

    Answer: D — Scheduled Tribe members of the State Assembly

    Paragraph 4 of the Fifth Schedule fills about three-fourths of the Council with the Scheduled Tribe members of the State Legislative Assembly; the Council only advises the Governor. Autonomous district councils belong to the Sixth Schedule, which is why that option is the trap.
  15. Consider the following statements about the Sixth Schedule:
    1. It applies to the tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram.
    2. A district council has not more than thirty members, of whom not more than four are nominated by the Governor.
    3. Laws made by a district council on matters such as inheritance and marriage require the assent of the Governor.
    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    1. Only one
    2. Only two
    3. All three
    4. None
    Show answer

    Answer: C — All three

    All three are correct. The Sixth Schedule (Art 244(2)) covers the four north-eastern States, a district council has up to thirty members with at most four nominated, and its laws on land, inheritance, marriage and social customs take effect only with the Governor's assent. The common slip is to give such laws to the President, which is the Fifth Schedule's route for the Governor's regulations.
  16. Under Article 239AA, the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi cannot make laws on which of the following groups of State List subjects?

    1. Public order, police and land
    2. Public health, sanitation and water supply
    3. Local government, markets and fairs
    4. Agriculture, fisheries and trade within the territory
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Public order, police and land

    Article 239AA(3)(a) lets the Delhi Assembly legislate on State and Concurrent List matters except entries 1, 2 and 18 of the State List — public order, police and land — and the entries connected with them. The other groups are ordinary State subjects on which the Assembly can legislate, subject to Parliament's overriding laws.
  17. Consider the following statements about Union Territories:
    1. Delhi is the only Union Territory that has a High Court of its own.
    2. The President may make regulations for the peace, progress and good government of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and of Lakshadweep.
    3. Puducherry has a Legislative Assembly created by a law of Parliament made under Article 239A.
    4. Ladakh has an elected Legislative Assembly.
    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    1. 1 and 2 only
    2. 1, 2 and 3 only
    3. 2, 3 and 4 only
    4. 1, 2, 3 and 4
    Show answer

    Answer: B — 1, 2 and 3 only

    Statements 1 (Art 241), 2 (Art 240) and 3 (Art 239A) are correct. Statement 4 is wrong: the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 gave the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir a legislature but created Ladakh as a Union Territory without one, so only Delhi, Puducherry and Jammu and Kashmir have elected Assemblies.