Anthropology in Practice II: Community Development Projects, Revisits and Restudies, Intervention, the Research Process and Social Impact Assessment, Anthropological Approaches in Community Studies, Plans and Sub-Plans, NGOs, the Empowerment of Women, and LGBT Groups

The last chapter of the course takes the rest of Unit X: community development projects in rural, urban and tribal areas; the methods by which anthropologists return to, evaluate and intervene in communities — revisits, restudies, reinterpretations, intervention, the research process and social impact assessment; the fifteen fields of community study the syllabus lists, from public health to ageing; development strategies through plans and sub-plans; the role of NGOs; and two groups whose rights and recognition development must address, women and LGBT people. Throughout, the anthropologist's question is the same: how does a programme look from the community's side, and who gains or loses by it? Language matters especially in the last section; the chapter uses the terms people use for themselves and the terms of Indian law. NET Social Work, Public Administration and Women's Studies overlap with parts of this chapter; the emphasis here is on ethnographic evidence and the anthropological critique of development.

1. Community development projects: rural, urban and tribal

Community development is a method by which the people of a community, with the help of the state, plan and carry out improvements in their own living conditions. Before independence it was tried in several experiments: Rabindranath Tagore's rural reconstruction at Sriniketan (from 1921), the YMCA's Marthandam project in Travancore under Spencer Hatch, F.L. Brayne's "uplift" drive in Gurgaon in the 1920s, and the Firka development scheme in Madras (1946). The immediate model was the Etawah pilot project in Uttar Pradesh, begun in 1948 under the American planner Albert Mayer, which combined agricultural extension with village-level workers who lived among the villagers. The national Community Development Programme was launched on 2 October 1952 with fifty-five projects, each covering about three hundred villages, and the National Extension Service followed in 1953; the country was divided into development blocks under a Block Development Officer, with a multipurpose village-level worker (gram sevak) as the link to the village, and programmes in agriculture, animal husbandry, irrigation, health, education, communication, cooperation and social welfare. The results were mixed, and anthropologists were among the first to say so. S.C. Dube's India's Changing Villages (1958), based on a project area in western Uttar Pradesh, found that benefits went mainly to the landowning and upper castes, that officials and villagers misunderstood each other across a gap of culture and status, and that programmes were judged by targets rather than by people's felt needs. The Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957), appointed to review the programme, concluded that it had failed to create popular participation, and recommended democratic decentralisation — the origin of Panchayati Raj. Urban community development began with pilot projects in Delhi (from 1958) and in cities such as Ahmedabad, Baroda and Hyderabad in the 1960s, organising slum residents into neighbourhood committees for self-help in sanitation, education and income generation; later programmes for the urban poor included Urban Basic Services (1986), the Swarna Jayanti Shahari Rozgar Yojana (1997) and the National Urban Livelihoods Mission (2013, now Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana–NULM). Tribal community development began with the Special Multipurpose Tribal Development Blocks of 1954; the Elwin Committee (1959) and the Dhebar Commission (1960–61) found them too uniform and too rushed, and they were replaced by Tribal Development Blocks and, from the Fifth Plan, by the Integrated Tribal Development Projects of the Tribal Sub-Plan (Chapter 24). The anthropological lessons have been constant: programmes must begin from local knowledge and institutions, reach the poorest and not only the influential, respect the pace and priorities of the community, and be evaluated from the community's point of view.

ProgrammeBeganKey featuresAnthropological assessment
Etawah pilot project1948Albert Mayer; extension through resident village workersThe model for the national programme
Community Development Programme2 October 195255 projects; blocks; village-level workers; National Extension Service (1953)Dube (1958): benefits to the better-off; gap between officials and villagers
Urban community developmentDelhi pilot, 1958Neighbourhood committees in slums; self-helpLater folded into programmes for the urban poor (1986, 1997, 2013)
Tribal development blocks1954Special multipurpose blocks in tribal areasFound too uniform by the Elwin Committee and the Dhebar Commission; replaced by ITDPs
ℹ️ Why the programme led to Panchayati Raj
The Balwant Rai Mehta Committee was appointed in 1957 to review the Community Development Programme and the National Extension Service. Its central finding — that the programme lacked people's participation — produced the recommendation of three-tier democratic decentralisation, first implemented at Nagaur on 2 October 1959, seven years to the day after the programme began.

2. Revisits, restudies, reinterpretations, intervention, the research process and social impact assessment

A revisit is the return of an ethnographer to a community studied before, by the same scholar or another; a restudy is a new study of the same community; a reinterpretation is a new reading of the same or new data. The classic case is Tepoztlán in Mexico: Robert Redfield (1930) described a harmonious, integrated folk community; Oscar Lewis (Life in a Mexican Village, 1951) found conflict, envy, poverty and suspicion. The difference, they agreed, came partly from change, partly from their different questions and methods, and partly from their own values. Mead and Freeman on Samoa (Chapter 21) is a reinterpretation that became a controversy. Raymond Firth returned to Tikopia after a cyclone and famine (Social Change in Tikopia, 1959), a revisit that measured change against his earlier baseline (We the Tikopia, 1936). In India, Karimpur, studied by the Wisers from the 1920s, was restudied by Susan Wadley (Struggling with Destiny in Karimpur, 1925–1984, 1994); Epstein returned to Wangala and Dalena; Srinivas's Rampura and Béteille's Sripuram have been revisited. Michael Burawoy (2003) classified revisits by whether the differences are traced to the observer or to the world, and to internal processes or external forces. Intervention is deliberate action to change a situation — a programme, a project, a policy or an advocacy campaign — and anthropologists take part in designing, delivering and evaluating it. Kurt Lewin's action research (1946) set out a cycle of planning, action, observation and reflection, and participatory action research, developed in Latin America by Orlando Fals Borda, makes community members co-researchers who own the process and its results. Every intervention raises ethical questions of consent, power and unintended consequences, and the "do no harm" principle applies. The research process runs through the formulation of a problem; a review of the literature; hypotheses or research questions; the research design (exploratory, descriptive, explanatory or evaluative); the choice of site and sample; fieldwork and data collection by participant observation, interviews, genealogies, case studies, surveys and participatory methods (Chapter 2); analysis and interpretation; writing; and the return of results to the community, with ethical review and informed consent throughout. Social impact assessment (SIA) is the process of identifying, predicting, evaluating and managing the social consequences of planned interventions — dams, mines, highways, industrial corridors, protected areas and urban projects. The International Association for Impact Assessment's International Principles for SIA (2003) set out its aims: to bring about a more sustainable and equitable environment, to consider all affected people and to involve them. Its stages are scoping, baseline profiling, prediction of impacts on livelihoods, culture, health, gender, community cohesion and vulnerable groups, formulation of mitigation and benefit-sharing measures, and monitoring. In India the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 requires an SIA, with a public hearing and review by an independent expert group, before land is acquired for a public purpose, and requires the prior consent of at least 80 per cent of affected families for private projects and 70 per cent for public–private partnership projects, with special safeguards for Scheduled Areas and gram sabhas; environmental clearance under the EIA Notification (2006) adds a public hearing. Anthropologists contribute baseline ethnography, knowledge of land tenure and customary rights, and attention to those whom official surveys miss — landless labourers, women, nomadic users of the commons.

CommunityFirst studyRevisit, restudy or reinterpretation
Tepoztlán, MexicoRobert Redfield (1930): an integrated folk communityOscar Lewis (1951): conflict and poverty
SamoaMargaret Mead (1928)Derek Freeman (1983)
TikopiaRaymond Firth, We the Tikopia (1936)Firth, Social Change in Tikopia (1959)
Karimpur, Uttar PradeshWilliam and Charlotte Wiser (from the 1920s)Susan Wadley (1994)
Wangala and Dalena, KarnatakaT. Scarlett Epstein (1962)Epstein (1973 and later)
⚠️ The consent thresholds of 2013
Under the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, consent is required from at least 80 per cent of affected families for private projects and 70 per cent for public–private partnership projects; an SIA precedes acquisition. Do not confuse these with the Forest Rights Act, where the gram sabha initiates the recognition of rights, or with PESA, which requires the gram sabha to be consulted before acquisition in Scheduled Areas.

3. Anthropological approaches in community studies

The syllabus lists fifteen fields in which anthropologists study communities for the sake of improving their lives. What unites the approaches is holism, the insider's view, attention to inequality within the community, and fieldwork over time. Public health: anthropologists study local ideas of illness and healing, the use of plural medical systems, and the barriers — distance, cost, language, distrust, gender — that keep people from services; community health workers such as the ASHAs of the National Rural Health Mission (2005) were designed to bridge that gap, and ethnography has shaped programmes on malaria, tuberculosis, maternal health and, in tribal areas, sickle-cell disease. Education: studies of tribal and Dalit schooling show how a curriculum in an unfamiliar language, teachers from outside, and a calendar that ignores agricultural seasons produce drop-out; mother-tongue-based multilingual education (as piloted in Odisha), ashram (residential) schools and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (2009) are responses, and the National Education Policy (2020) recommends teaching in the home language in the early years. Nutrition (Chapter 26) is studied through household food allocation, food taboos and seasonality. Land alienation — the transfer of tribal land to non-tribals by sale, mortgage, fraud or acquisition — is studied through land records and oral histories and resisted by laws such as the Chotanagpur and Santal Parganas Tenancy Acts and the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation. Bonded labour, forbidden by Article 23 and abolished by the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976, persists in agriculture, brick kilns and quarries through debt; anthropologists have documented older forms such as hali in Gujarat and kamaiya in Nepal and supported rescue and rehabilitation. Housing: studies of slums, resettlement colonies and rural housing programmes (the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, 2015) examine whether designs fit family structure, livelihood and custom. Alternative economy covers reciprocity and barter, cooperatives, the commons, gift and solidarity economies and the collection of minor forest produce — economic forms that official statistics often miss. Livelihood studies use the sustainable livelihoods framework (Chambers and Conway, 1992; the British Department for International Development, 1999), in which people draw on five kinds of capital — human, natural, financial, physical and social — to pursue strategies within a context of vulnerability. Gender issues — the division of labour, access to land, violence, health — run through all of these. Relief, rehabilitation and relocation after disasters and displacement are studied through Cernea's risk model (Chapter 26), the Narmada and Sardar Sarovar controversies, and disaster anthropology after cyclones, floods, earthquakes and the 2004 tsunami; the Disaster Management Act (2005) frames the official response. Identity crisis refers to the stress of acculturation, displacement and migration, when younger people are caught between the values of their community and those of school, city and media. Communication covers development communication, from the Satellite Instructional Television Experiment (1975–76) to community radio and mobile phones, and the need to use local languages and forms. Training and management means building local capacity — training village health workers, SHG leaders and panchayat members — and managing programmes with community participation. Ageing and the aged is a growing field: persons aged sixty and above were about 10.4 crore (8.6 per cent) in 2011; the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act (2007) and the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (first wave 2017–18) respond to changing families, migration of the young and the loneliness and dependence of the old.

FieldAnthropological questionIndian frame
Public healthWhat keeps people from care, and how do they understand illness?ASHAs under the National Rural Health Mission (2005)
EducationWhy do children leave school?RTE Act (2009); mother-tongue education; NEP (2020)
Land alienationHow is tribal land lost, and to whom?Tenancy Acts; Scheduled Area land transfer regulations; PESA
Bonded labourHow does debt bind labour across generations?Article 23; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act (1976)
LivelihoodWhat capitals and strategies do households use?Sustainable livelihoods framework (1992, 1999); NRLM
Relief and rehabilitationWho bears the risks of displacement and disaster?LARR Act (2013); Disaster Management Act (2005)
AgeingHow do changing families care for the old?Senior Citizens Act (2007); LASI (2017–18)
🧠 The five capitals
The sustainable livelihoods framework names five capitals: human (skills, health), natural (land, water, forest), financial (savings, credit), physical (infrastructure, tools) and social (networks, groups, trust). "Cultural capital" is Bourdieu's term (Chapter 22), not part of this framework. The standard definition of a livelihood — the capabilities, assets and activities required for a means of living — is Chambers and Conway's (1992).

4. Development strategies (plan and sub-plan), and NGOs

India's development strategy was set for more than six decades by the Planning Commission (1950) and twelve Five-Year Plans (1951–2017), with annual plans between some of them; the Planning Commission was replaced by the NITI Aayog on 1 January 2015, and the plan era ended in 2017. Early plans relied on growth and the expectation that its benefits would "trickle down"; from the Fifth Plan (1974–79) the removal of poverty (garibi hatao) and area and group targeting became central. Sub-plans are the instruments of group targeting. The Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP), adopted in the Fifth Plan on the recommendation of an expert committee, requires Central ministries and States to earmark a share of plan outlays at least in proportion to the Scheduled Tribe population and to spend it in tribal areas, through ITDPs, MADA pockets and clusters. The Special Component Plan for Scheduled Castes, begun in the Sixth Plan (1979–80), was renamed the Scheduled Castes Sub-Plan (SCSP) in 2006 and follows the same principle of proportionate earmarking. Since the end of the Five-Year Plans the allocations have been reported in the Union Budget as Development Action Plans for Scheduled Castes and for Scheduled Tribes. Evaluations — including the Xaxa Committee (2014) — found that funds were often notional, diverted to general schemes or left unspent, and that tribal people had little say in how sub-plan money was used; several States (Andhra Pradesh in 2013, Telangana, Karnataka) have passed laws to make the sub-plans binding. Other area strategies include the Hill Area and Desert Development Programmes, the Drought Prone Areas Programme and the Aspirational Districts Programme (2018); the wider frame is set by the human development approach (the UNDP's Human Development Index, 1990, from the work of Mahbub ul Haq and Amartya Sen) and the Sustainable Development Goals (2015). Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are voluntary, non-profit bodies independent of the state that work for public purposes. In India they are registered as societies (Societies Registration Act, 1860), trusts (Indian Trusts Act, 1882, and State public trust laws) or not-for-profit companies (Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013), and those receiving foreign funds are regulated by the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, tightened in 2020. They range from charitable and welfare bodies, through service-delivery and development organisations, to empowerment and advocacy organisations and community-based organisations of the poor themselves; well-known examples include the Self-Employed Women's Association (SEWA, 1972), Seva Mandir in Udaipur (1968), BAIF (1967), PRADAN (1983) and the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (1990), whose campaign led to the Right to Information Act (2005). Their roles include delivering services where the state is weak, innovating models later adopted by government, mobilising communities, advocacy and litigation, research and monitoring the state. Anthropology and NGOs meet in several ways: anthropologists work for and with NGOs, bringing ethnographic methods, local knowledge and evaluation; and anthropologists study NGOs as social forms. David Mosse's Cultivating Development (2005), an ethnography of a British-funded rainfed farming project among the Bhil of western India, showed how project policy and practice diverge and how success is produced by the networks that interpret a project; other studies examine donor dependence, the professionalisation of activism, accountability to beneficiaries versus funders, and the tensions between NGOs, social movements and the state.

InstrumentBeganPrinciple
Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP)Fifth Plan (1974–75)Plan outlays earmarked at least in proportion to the ST population, spent in tribal areas through ITDPs, MADA pockets and clusters
Special Component Plan, later SCSPSixth Plan (1979–80); renamed 2006Outlays earmarked in proportion to the SC population, for schemes that directly benefit SC households and habitations
Development Action Plans for SCs and STsAfter the plan era (from 2017–18)Budget reporting of the earmarked allocations across ministries
NITI Aayog1 January 2015Replaced the Planning Commission; policy think tank and cooperative federalism
🎯 Why anthropologists study NGOs as well as working in them
An NGO sits between donors, the state and a community, and each expects something different of it. Ethnography of NGOs, like Mosse's of a development project, shows how these expectations are negotiated, whose voice counts, and why reports of success may differ from what villagers experience — knowledge an anthropologist working inside an NGO also needs.

5. Empowerment of women, and LGBT groups

Development thinking about women has passed through three approaches. Women in Development (WID), prompted by Ester Boserup's Woman's Role in Economic Development (1970), which showed that colonial and modern agricultural change had often reduced women's status, sought to integrate women into development projects. Women and Development (WAD) stressed that women had always been part of development and that the problem was the terms of their inclusion. Gender and Development (GAD), from the 1980s, turned attention to gender relations and power, and to transforming them. Empowerment, in Naila Kabeer's influential definition (1999), is the expansion of people's ability to make strategic life choices in a context where this ability was previously denied, and has three dimensions: resources (the preconditions), agency (the process of making choices, including negotiation and resistance) and achievements (the outcomes). In India the report Towards Equality (1974) of the Committee on the Status of Women in India showed declining sex ratios and women's marginalisation and gave the women's movement its evidence; the National Commission for Women (1992), one-third reservation in panchayats and municipalities (1992–93), the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005), the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act (2013), the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao campaign (2015) and the Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023, which reserves one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies for women from the first delimitation after it comes into force, are among the institutional responses. The 2011 Census counted 943 women per 1,000 men and a child sex ratio of 918. Anthropology adds several cautions: that women's status varies with kinship, caste, class, region and religion; that matrilineal societies such as the Khasi, Garo and Nair are not matriarchies, though they give women distinctive rights; that SHGs (Chapter 24) and quotas can widen women's public role while household burdens remain; and that empowerment must be judged by women's own priorities. LGBT is an abbreviation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, often extended (LGBTQIA+) to include queer, intersex, asexual and other identities. Anthropologists have long documented that many societies recognise more than two genders or accept same-sex relations in particular forms: Two-Spirit people among Native North American nations (a term adopted in 1990, replacing the older outsider's term "berdache"), the fa'afafine of Samoa, and, in South Asia, the hijra, kinnar, aravani or thirunangai (Tamil Nadu, with the Koovagam festival), jogappa and others. Hijra communities are organised in guru–chela (teacher–disciple) households grouped into lineages called gharanas, with their own rules of initiation, kinship and livelihood — including blessing at births and weddings; their ethnography, from Serena Nanda's Neither Man nor Woman (1990) to Gayatri Reddy's With Respect to Sex (2005), shows how gender, sexuality, religion and economy intersect. Gilbert Herdt's Third Sex, Third Gender (1994) and Kath Weston's Families We Choose (1991) on lesbian and gay kinship broadened the field. Indian law has changed rapidly: in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014) the Supreme Court recognised transgender persons as a "third gender" with the right to self-identify their gender; in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) it decriminalised consensual sexual acts between adults of the same sex by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code; the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 prohibits discrimination and provides for certificates of identity, though activists criticised its procedure; and in Supriyo Chakraborty v. Union of India (2023) the Court declined to recognise a right to same-sex marriage, leaving the matter to Parliament, while affirming that queer persons must not face discrimination. The World Health Organization's ICD-11 (in effect from 2022) no longer classifies gender incongruence as a mental disorder. Anthropologists working with LGBT communities follow the ethics of self-identification, confidentiality and respect for people's own terms, and study discrimination in families, schools, workplaces and health care, the growth of community organisations, and the ways kinship is remade.

MilestoneYearWhat it did
Towards Equality (Committee on the Status of Women in India)1974Documented declining sex ratios and women's marginalisation
Constitution (106th Amendment) Act2023One-third of Lok Sabha and Assembly seats reserved for women after the next delimitation
NALSA v. Union of India2014Recognised transgender persons as a third gender with the right to self-identify
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India2018Decriminalised consensual same-sex relations between adults (Section 377 read down)
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act2019Prohibits discrimination; certificates of identity
Supriyo Chakraborty v. Union of India2023Declined to recognise same-sex marriage; left the matter to Parliament
⚠️ NALSA 2014, Navtej 2018
NALSA (2014) is about gender identity — transgender persons as a third gender, with self-identification. Navtej Singh Johar (2018) is about sexuality — decriminalising consensual same-sex relations under Section 377. Supriyo (2023) concerned marriage and did not recognise it. Kabeer's three dimensions of empowerment are resources, agency and achievements; WID began with Boserup (1970).

Key takeaways

  • The Community Development Programme (2 October 1952; Etawah pilot 1948; National Extension Service 1953) worked through blocks and village-level workers; Dube (1958) and the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957) found benefits skewed and participation lacking; urban community development began in Delhi (1958) and tribal blocks in 1954, later replaced by ITDPs.
  • Revisits and restudies (Redfield and Lewis on Tepoztlán; Mead and Freeman; Firth on Tikopia; Wiser and Wadley on Karimpur; Epstein) show how change, method and values shape findings; intervention follows action research (Lewin, 1946) and participatory action research; SIA identifies, predicts and mitigates social impacts, and the 2013 Act requires it with 80 or 70 per cent consent.
  • Community studies span public health, education, nutrition, land alienation, bonded labour (Article 23; Act of 1976), housing, alternative economy, livelihood (five capitals), gender, relief and rehabilitation, identity crisis, communication, training and management, and ageing (8.6 per cent aged sixty or more in 2011), united by holism and the insider's view.
  • Plans ran from 1951 to 2017 (NITI Aayog from 2015); the Tribal Sub-Plan (Fifth Plan) and the Scheduled Castes Sub-Plan (Special Component Plan, Sixth Plan; renamed 2006) earmark funds in proportion to population; NGOs, registered as societies, trusts or Section 8 companies and regulated by the FCRA, deliver, innovate and advocate, and anthropologists both work in them and study them (Mosse, 2005).
  • Women's empowerment moved from WID (Boserup, 1970) through WAD to GAD, and Kabeer (1999) defines it by resources, agency and achievements; Towards Equality (1974) and the 106th Amendment (2023) frame Indian policy. LGBT rights rest on NALSA (2014, third gender), Navtej Singh Johar (2018, Section 377), the 2019 Act and Supriyo (2023, no marriage right), with hijra, Two-Spirit and other gender systems documented by ethnography.

Practice questions (10)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. In which year was India's national Community Development Programme launched, on 2 October? Give the year.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 1952

    The programme began on 2 October 1952 with fifty-five projects; the National Extension Service followed in 1953, and the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee reviewed both in 1957.
  2. The Supreme Court judgment that decriminalised consensual sexual relations between adults of the same sex by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is

    1. National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014)
    2. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)
    3. Supriyo Chakraborty v. Union of India (2023)
    4. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)
    Show answer

    Answer: D — Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)

    Navtej Singh Johar (2018) read down Section 377. NALSA (2014) recognised transgender persons as a third gender; Supriyo (2023) declined to recognise same-sex marriage; Indra Sawhney (1992) concerned OBC reservation.
  3. Which statements about the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 are correct? Select all that apply.

    1. It requires a social impact assessment before land is acquired for a public purpose
    2. Public–private partnership projects require the consent of at least 50 per cent of affected families
    3. It is the law under which gram sabhas initiate the recognition of forest rights
    4. Private projects require the consent of at least 80 per cent of affected families
    Show answer

    Answer: A — It requires a social impact assessment before land is acquired for a public purpose; D — Private projects require the consent of at least 80 per cent of affected families

    The Act requires an SIA and the consent of 80 per cent of affected families for private projects; for public–private partnership projects the figure is 70 per cent, not 50. The gram sabha's role in recognising forest rights belongs to the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
  4. Match the community with the scholars of its first study and its restudy or reinterpretation. (a) Tepoztlán (b) Samoa (c) Karimpur (d) Tikopia. Pairs: (1) Mead and Freeman (2) Firth and Firth (3) Redfield and Lewis (4) the Wisers and Wadley

    1. a-3, b-1, c-2, d-4
    2. a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2
    3. a-1, b-3, c-4, d-2
    4. a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
    Show answer

    Answer: D — a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2

    Redfield (1930) and Lewis (1951) studied Tepoztlán; Mead (1928) and Freeman (1983) Samoa; the Wisers and later Susan Wadley (1994) Karimpur; and Firth returned to his own Tikopia (1936, 1959).
  5. Which of the following are among the five capitals of the sustainable livelihoods framework? Select all that apply.

    1. Cultural capital
    2. Physical capital
    3. Social capital
    4. Natural capital
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Physical capital; C — Social capital; D — Natural capital

    The five capitals are human, natural, financial, physical and social. Cultural capital is Pierre Bourdieu's concept and is not one of them.
  6. Assertion (A): The Tribal Sub-Plan requires plan outlays to be earmarked at least in proportion to the Scheduled Tribe population. Reason (R): The Tribal Sub-Plan strategy was adopted in the Fifth Five-Year Plan.

    1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
    2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
    3. A is true, but R is false
    4. A is false, but R is true
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A

    Both are true, but R does not explain A: the date of adoption does not account for the principle of proportionate earmarking, which follows from the aim of ensuring that tribal areas receive at least their population share of development funds.
  7. Assertion (A): Hijras in India form a single caste into which members are born. Reason (R): Hijra communities are organised in guru–chela households grouped into lineages called gharanas.

    1. Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
    2. Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
    3. A is true, but R is false
    4. A is false, but R is true
    Show answer

    Answer: D — A is false, but R is true

    A is false and R is true: people join hijra communities through initiation into a guru's household rather than by birth, and the guru–chela relationship and the gharanas form a kinship of their own.
  8. In Naila Kabeer's framework (1999), the three interrelated dimensions of empowerment are

    1. human, natural and social capital
    2. resources, agency and achievements
    3. welfare, access and control
    4. participation, representation and reservation
    Show answer

    Answer: B — resources, agency and achievements

    Kabeer defines empowerment as the expansion of the ability to make strategic life choices where it was denied, through resources (preconditions), agency (process) and achievements (outcomes). The capitals belong to the livelihoods framework.
  9. David Mosse's Cultivating Development (2005) is best described as

    1. a study of a World Bank project in Lesotho as an "anti-politics machine"
    2. a manual of participatory rural appraisal methods
    3. an ethnography of a British-funded rainfed farming project among the Bhil of western India, showing how policy and practice diverge
    4. an evaluation of the Community Development Programme in western Uttar Pradesh
    Show answer

    Answer: C — an ethnography of a British-funded rainfed farming project among the Bhil of western India, showing how policy and practice diverge

    Mosse studied a project he had worked on as a consultant, showing that success is produced by the networks that interpret it. The Lesotho study is Ferguson's (1990), the Community Development evaluation Dube's (1958), and PRA is associated with Robert Chambers.
  10. Arrange the following in chronological order, earliest first: (a) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (b) Launch of the Community Development Programme (c) Report Towards Equality (d) NALSA v. Union of India

    1. c, b, d, a
    2. b, c, d, a
    3. b, d, c, a
    4. b, c, a, d
    Show answer

    Answer: B — b, c, d, a

    The Community Development Programme was launched in 1952, Towards Equality was published in 1974, NALSA was decided in 2014 and Navtej Singh Johar in 2018.