Analytical and Computational Tools — Microscopy, Spectroscopy, Assays, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
2. Principles of spectroscopy — UV-visible, fluorescence, CD, IR, MS and NMR
UV–visible spectroscopy measures light absorbed by a sample. Beer–Lambert law, A = epsilon·c·l, makes absorbance A proportional to concentration c (epsilon the molar absorptivity, l the path length), the basis of quantitation. Nucleic acids absorb at 260 nm and proteins at 280 nm (from aromatic residues), so the A260/A280 ratio reports purity: about 1.8 for clean DNA and 2.0 for clean RNA, lower when protein contaminates. Fluorescence spectroscopy reads emitted light and is far more sensitive than absorbance. Circular dichroism (CD) measures the differential absorption of left- and right-circularly polarised light by chiral molecules; in the far-UV it reports protein secondary structure (alpha-helix, beta-sheet) and is a standard probe of folding.
Infrared (IR) and FT-IR spectroscopy probe molecular vibrations, so an IR spectrum is a fingerprint of the functional groups present (a protein’s amide I band reports its secondary structure); FT-IR collects the whole spectrum at once from an interferogram, which is faster and more sensitive. Mass spectrometry (MS) ionises molecules and separates the ions by their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z), giving accurate mass; soft ionisation — ESI (electrospray) and MALDI — made MS work for proteins and peptides, and tandem MS (MS/MS) fragments a peptide to read its sequence, the heart of proteomics. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) uses the behaviour of nuclear spins (¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁵N) in a strong magnetic field; chemical shifts, couplings and nuclear Overhauser effects give atom-level structure and dynamics, and NMR can solve the three-dimensional structure of a protein in solution.
Worked example (Beer–Lambert). A DNA solution in a 1 cm cuvette gives A260 = 0.30. Using the convention that an A260 of 1.0 corresponds to about 50 micrograms per mL of double-stranded DNA, the concentration is 0.30 × 50 = 15 micrograms per mL. If this reading came from a tenfold dilution, the stock is 150 micrograms per mL. The A260/A280 ratio of the same sample tells whether that DNA is protein-free.
3. Electrophoresis, microarrays, assays, immunoassays, flow cytometry and sequencing-based methods
Electrophoresis separates charged molecules in a gel under an electric field. Agarose gel electrophoresis sorts nucleic acids by size — DNA is negatively charged and migrates to the anode, and small fragments move faster, so log(size) is roughly linear in migration distance; it is visualised with an intercalating dye. SDS-PAGE separates proteins by size because the detergent SDS coats every protein with a uniform negative charge and denatures it, so migration depends on mass alone; isoelectric focusing separates by pI, and 2-D gel electrophoresis combines IEF then SDS-PAGE to resolve thousands of proteins. Microarrays hold thousands of DNA probes in a grid; labelled sample hybridises to them, so a DNA microarray reads the expression of thousands of genes at once (now largely superseded by RNA-seq) and genotyping arrays read many SNPs.
Immunoassays use an antibody to detect and measure a specific antigen. In an ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) an antibody is linked to an enzyme that turns a substrate to a coloured product read in a plate reader; the sandwich ELISA captures the antigen between two antibodies for high specificity, and the indirect ELISA detects antibodies in a serum (as in antibody tests). RIA (radioimmunoassay) uses a radiolabel instead of an enzyme and is extremely sensitive. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence apply labelled antibodies to tissue sections to show where an antigen is. Immunoblotting (western blot) detects a protein separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a membrane. Flow cytometry passes single cells in a stream past a laser and reads their scatter and fluorescence, counting and sorting cells by surface or internal markers (FACS physically sorts them). Enzymatic assays quantify an enzyme by the rate at which it converts substrate (Section 4 of the paper develops the kinetics).
Sequencing-based methods read genomes and their interactions directly. Whole-genome sequencing reads an organism’s entire genome (NGS, Chapter 1) and underlies genomics, resequencing and variant detection. ChIP sequencing (ChIP-seq) finds where a protein binds DNA across the whole genome: chromatin is cross-linked, the DNA is sheared, the protein (a transcription factor or a modified histone) is pulled down with an antibody (chromatin immunoprecipitation), and the co-precipitated DNA is sequenced, so the binding sites appear as peaks. It is the genome-wide version of the DNA–protein interaction assays in Chapter 1.
4. Bioinformatics — resources, databases, sequence analysis, alignment and phylogeny
Bioinformatics resources and databases. The primary sequence archives are GenBank (NCBI), ENA (EMBL-EBI) and DDBJ, which mirror each other; UniProt is the main protein-sequence database and the PDB holds experimentally determined 3D structures. Data move in standard file formats — FASTA (a header line beginning with ">" and the sequence), FASTQ (a read plus per-base quality scores, for NGS), GenBank flat files, and PDB/mmCIF for structures. Searching a sequence against a database is done with BLAST, which finds local similarities fast and reports an E-value — the number of hits of that score expected by chance in a database of that size — so a small E-value means a significant, probably homologous, match.
Sequence alignment lines up residues to reveal similarity. A pairwise alignment can be global (Needleman–Wunsch, end-to-end) or local (Smith–Waterman, the best matching sub-region); both use dynamic programming and a scoring scheme of match/mismatch scores and gap penalties. For proteins the match scores come from a substitution matrix — PAM (built from closely related proteins and extrapolated) or BLOSUM (built directly from blocks of aligned sequences; BLOSUM62 is the common default) — which scores a pair of amino acids by how often they substitute for each other in real alignments. A multiple sequence alignment (MSA) aligns many sequences at once (progressive methods such as Clustal and MUSCLE) and reveals conserved motifs and columns.
Phylogeny builds a tree of evolutionary relationships from aligned sequences. Distance methods (UPGMA, neighbour-joining) turn the alignment into a matrix of pairwise distances and cluster from it; character methods work from the columns directly — maximum parsimony chooses the tree needing the fewest changes, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods choose the tree most probable under an explicit model of substitution. A tree’s branching is tested by bootstrap resampling, whose values say how often a clade recurs. The same molecular-evolution reasoning appears in the Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Biology section of this paper.
5. Genomics, proteomics, metabolomics; gene prediction, annotation and structure prediction
The omics disciplines study whole classes of molecule at once. Genomics is the study of the entire genome — its sequence, structure and variation; functional genomics and transcriptomics (RNA-seq) read which genes are active. Proteomics is the large-scale study of all proteins in a sample, dominated by mass spectrometry (Section 2) often after 2-D gel or liquid-chromatographic separation, and it reports identity, abundance and post-translational modification — information a genome cannot give because one gene makes many protein forms. Metabolomics profiles the small-molecule metabolites, using MS and NMR, and is the closest readout of a cell’s actual physiological state. Together these feed systems biology (Section 6).
Gene prediction finds the genes in a raw genome sequence. In prokaryotes it looks for open reading frames — stretches from a start codon to a stop codon long enough to be real — and for promoters and ribosome-binding sites. In eukaryotes it is harder because genes are split by introns, so predictors combine signals (splice sites, start/stop, codon-usage statistics) with evidence from aligned ESTs, cDNA and RNA-seq reads and from homology to known genes. Functional annotation then assigns a predicted gene a likely function — by homology (BLAST to characterised proteins), by conserved domains (Pfam, InterPro) and by controlled vocabularies such as Gene Ontology and pathway databases (KEGG).
Structure prediction infers a protein’s shape from its sequence. Secondary-structure prediction classifies each residue as helix, strand or coil. 3D (tertiary) structure prediction was long split between homology (comparative) modelling — building a model on a known structure of a related protein — and ab initio folding when no template exists; deep-learning methods have recently made accurate prediction routine for many proteins. Knowledge discovery in biochemical databases — data mining across sequence, structure, pathway and literature databases — turns these accumulated data into new hypotheses, for example predicting a protein’s function or an enzyme’s substrate from patterns across many entries.
6. Metagenomics, metabolic engineering and systems biology
Metagenomics sequences DNA taken directly from an environment — soil, gut, ocean, a bioreactor — without first culturing the organisms in it. Because most microbes cannot yet be grown in the lab, metagenomics is the way to survey the genes and species of a whole microbial community, to find novel enzymes and pathways, and to compare communities (for example a healthy against a diseased gut). It couples the sequencing of Chapter 1 with the bioinformatics of Section 4 (assembly, binning, taxonomic and functional annotation).
Metabolic engineering is the deliberate redesign of a cell’s metabolic network to improve or create the production of a compound — redirecting flux by overexpressing, deleting or introducing enzymes, removing feedback inhibition and balancing cofactors. Flux balance analysis (FBA) models the network at steady state (production equals consumption for every internal metabolite) and uses linear programming to find the flux distribution that maximises an objective such as growth or product yield, within the constraints of the stoichiometry. Engineered microbes made this way produce drugs, biofuels and chemicals (the artemisinic-acid yeast is a landmark). Systems biology is the larger programme: understanding how genes, proteins and metabolites behave as a network rather than as isolated parts, by combining omics data with computational models, so that the behaviour of the whole can be predicted and, in metabolic engineering, redesigned.
Key takeaways
- Resolution is d = lambda/2NA, so electrons (short wavelength) beat light; confocal uses a pinhole to reject out-of-focus light and give thin optical sections.
- Beer–Lambert A = epsilon·c·l quantifies; DNA absorbs at 260 nm, protein at 280 nm, so A260/A280 reports purity. CD gives secondary structure, MS gives accurate mass, NMR solves solution structures.
- SDS-PAGE separates proteins by mass (SDS gives uniform charge); ELISA, RIA, IHC and western blot use antibodies; flow cytometry counts and sorts single cells; ChIP-seq maps protein–DNA binding genome-wide.
- BLAST reports an E-value (smaller is more significant); alignment uses dynamic programming with BLOSUM/PAM matrices and gap penalties; phylogeny by distance, parsimony, likelihood or Bayesian methods, tested by bootstrap.
- Omics read whole classes at once (genomics, proteomics by MS, metabolomics); gene prediction plus functional annotation (GO, KEGG, Pfam); metagenomics skips culturing; FBA and systems biology model the network.
Practice questions (15)
Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.
The advantage of a confocal microscope over a conventional wide-field fluorescence microscope is that it
Show answer
Answer: A — uses a pinhole to reject out-of-focus light and image a thin optical section
The confocal pinhole blocks light from above and below the focal plane, so only an in-focus optical section reaches the detector, giving sharp images and 3D stacks. It still uses light and fluorophores and works on living cells; electrons are the electron microscope.A DNA sample read in a 1 cm cuvette gives A260 = 0.40. Taking A260 = 1.0 to mean 50 micrograms per mL of double-stranded DNA, and given that the sample was diluted 20-fold before reading, the stock concentration is ______ micrograms per mL.
Numerical answer — type the value.
Show answer
Answer: 400
The diluted sample is 0.40 × 50 = 20 micrograms per mL; multiplying by the 20-fold dilution gives the stock, 20 × 20 = 400 micrograms per mL. Forgetting the dilution gives 20, and using the protein factor instead of 50 is the other common slip.For an objective of numerical aperture 1.0 used with light of wavelength 500 nm, the Abbe resolution limit d = lambda/(2·NA) is ______ nm.
Numerical answer — type the value.
Show answer
Answer: 250
d = lambda/(2·NA) = 500/(2 × 1.0) = 250 nm. This is why a light microscope cannot resolve objects much closer than about a quarter of a micrometre; a shorter wavelength (electrons) or higher NA is needed to do better.A purified double-stranded DNA preparation is expected to have an A260/A280 ratio of about
Show answer
Answer: A — 1.8, with a lower value indicating protein contamination
Clean DNA reads about 1.8 (RNA about 2.0); protein, which absorbs at 280 nm, pulls the ratio down, so a value well below 1.8 flags protein contamination. The ratio is a purity check, not a fixed constant.A sandwich ELISA is used mainly to
Show answer
Answer: A — detect and quantify a specific antigen captured between two antibodies
In a sandwich ELISA a capture antibody binds the antigen and a second, enzyme-linked detection antibody binds another epitope on it, so the colour produced measures the antigen with high specificity. Size separation is electrophoresis, amplification is PCR, and sequencing is a different method.Flow cytometry measures properties of
Show answer
Answer: A — single cells passed one by one in a stream past a laser
Flow cytometry streams cells singly past a laser and reads their light scatter and fluorescence, counting and characterising them by markers; FACS sorts them physically. Tissue blocks are for histology, gels for electrophoresis and gas-phase ions for mass spectrometry.A BLAST search returns a hit with a very small E-value (for example 1e-50). This means the match is
Show answer
Answer: A — highly significant — very unlikely to have arisen by chance in a database of that size
The E-value is the number of hits of at least that score expected by chance in a database of that size, so a tiny E-value means chance is a very unlikely explanation and the similarity is significant (probably homology). It is not a percent identity, and BLAST uses local, not global, alignment.Why can a genome sequence alone not replace proteomics?
Show answer
Answer: A — one gene can give many protein forms through splicing and post-translational modification, which the genome does not show
The proteome is dynamic and larger than the gene count: alternative splicing, proteolytic processing and post-translational modifications mean one gene yields many protein species, and abundances vary with cell state. The genome lists the parts; proteomics measures which proteins, how much and in what modified form are actually present.In SDS-PAGE, proteins separate essentially by molecular mass because SDS
Show answer
Answer: A — denatures the protein and coats it with a roughly uniform negative charge per unit mass
SDS unfolds proteins and binds along the chain, giving a nearly constant charge-to-mass ratio, so electrophoretic mobility depends on size alone and the gel reports molecular weight. Keeping native charge/shape is native PAGE, and separating by pI is isoelectric focusing.ChIP sequencing (ChIP-seq) is used to determine
Show answer
Answer: A — where a given protein binds DNA across the whole genome
ChIP-seq cross-links chromatin, immunoprecipitates a target protein (a transcription factor or modified histone) with an antibody and sequences the co-precipitated DNA, so its binding sites across the genome appear as peaks. It reports protein–DNA binding sites, not protein sequence, metabolites or primer Tm.Which statements about sequence alignment are correct? Select all that apply.
Show answer
Answer: A — Needleman–Wunsch gives a global alignment and Smith–Waterman a local one; B — BLOSUM and PAM are substitution matrices used to score amino-acid pairs; C — Both algorithms use dynamic programming with gap penalties
Needleman–Wunsch is global and Smith–Waterman local; both are dynamic-programming algorithms with gap penalties; BLOSUM and PAM score amino-acid substitutions. The claim that a multiple sequence alignment aligns exactly two sequences is wrong by definition — it aligns three or more, not two.Eukaryotic gene prediction is harder than prokaryotic gene prediction mainly because eukaryotic genes
Show answer
Answer: A — are split by introns, so a continuous open reading frame is not enough to find them
Because exons are interrupted by introns, a eukaryotic coding region is not a single uninterrupted ORF, so predictors must find splice sites and combine them with RNA-seq/EST evidence and homology. Prokaryotic genes are largely continuous ORFs, which is why ORF-finding alone works far better there.Flux balance analysis (FBA) of a metabolic network assumes a steady state and uses linear programming to
Show answer
Answer: A — find the flux distribution that maximises an objective such as growth, within stoichiometric constraints
FBA imposes mass balance at steady state (net production of each internal metabolite is zero) as linear constraints from the stoichiometry, then optimises an objective such as biomass or product flux by linear programming. It does not need kinetic constants or concentrations, and it is not a sequencing or structure method.Metagenomics is distinctive because it
Show answer
Answer: A — sequences DNA taken directly from an environmental sample, without first culturing the organisms
Metagenomics sequences community DNA straight from soil, gut or water, so it captures the many microbes that cannot be cultured — the opposite of a pure-culture method. It is a sequencing-based approach, not a metabolite assay.Which technique would you choose to determine the accurate molecular mass of a purified peptide and, by fragmentation, its sequence?
Show answer
Answer: A — tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)
Mass spectrometry gives accurate mass from m/z, and tandem MS fragments the peptide to read its sequence — the core of proteomics. Agarose gels are for nucleic acids, A260 measures DNA concentration, and light microscopy images cells, none of which gives peptide mass or sequence.