Polymer Chemistry I: Monomers, Chain-Growth and Step-Growth Polymerization, Metallocene and Controlled Methods

This chapter is the first of two on Section XE5.1 “Polymer Chemistry” of XE5 Polymer Science and Engineering, one of the nine optional sections of the Engineering Sciences (XE) paper, any two of which a candidate chooses in the exam. It answers the first half of the heading: “Monomers; Degree of polymerization; Classification of polymers; Polymerization reactions: addition and condensation, their kinetics; Metallocene polymers and other newer methods of polymerization.” It teaches functionality and degree of polymerization, the classification of polymers, free-radical chain polymerization with its steady-state kinetics, kinetic chain length and the Mayo equation, ionic and coordination polymerization in outline, step-growth polymerization with the Carothers equation and its kinetics, and metallocene and controlled/living methods (ATRP, RAFT, ring-opening, group-transfer). The numericals are Carothers Xn from conversion or stoichiometric ratio, Mn from Xn, kinetic chain length from rates, and Xn of a living polymerization.

1. Monomers, functionality, degree of polymerization and classification

A monomer is a small molecule that can link to others to form a polymer. Its functionality f is the number of sites through which it can bond: a vinyl monomer CH₂=CHX has f = 2 (the double bond opens to give two bonds), adipic acid and hexamethylene diamine have f = 2, glycerol has f = 3. Bifunctional monomers give linear chains, an average functionality above 2 gives branching and finally a network. The degree of polymerization Xn (DP) is the number of structural (repeat) units in a chain, and Mn = Xn·M₀ plus the end groups, where M₀ is the mass of one repeat unit; for a copolymer or a step-growth polymer made from two monomers, M₀ is the mean mass per structural unit (half of the mass of the AA–BB repeat unit). Convention used throughout: Xn counts structural units, not monomer molecules in an AA–BB pair.

Common ways of classifying polymers
BasisClassesExamples
OriginNatural, semi-synthetic, syntheticCellulose, cellulose acetate, polyethylene
Thermal behaviourThermoplastic, thermoset, elastomerPE, phenolic resin, polyisoprene
MechanismChain-growth (addition), step-growth (condensation)PS; PET, nylon 66
CompositionHomopolymer, copolymerPVC; SBR
ArchitectureLinear, branched, crosslinked/networkHDPE, LDPE, vulcanized rubber
⚠️ Addition is not the same as chain-growth in every case
Condensation polymerization is defined by the mechanism (step-growth: any two molecules of any size can react, small molecule usually lost), not only by loss of a by-product. Polyurethane forms by step-growth without releasing any by-product; ring-opening of caprolactam is chain-growth-like although nylon 6 is a polyamide.

2. Free-radical addition polymerization and its steady-state kinetics

Chain-growth proceeds in three stages. Initiation: an initiator I (a peroxide or azo compound such as AIBN) decomposes, I → 2R•, rate constant k_d, and R• adds to a monomer. Only a fraction f (efficiency, about 0.3–0.8) of radicals starts chains, so the rate of initiation is Ri = 2f·k_d[I]. Propagation: M• + M → M•, rate constant k_p, repeated 10³–10⁵ times in about a second per chain, Rp = k_p[M][M•]. Termination: two radicals react by combination (coupling, giving one chain from two) or disproportionation (H transfer, giving two chains), with rate Rt = 2k_t[M•]² under the convention that k_t is defined per radical lost.

Steady-state hypothesis: radical concentration is tiny (10⁻⁸ to 10⁻⁷ mol/L) and constant, so Ri = Rt: 2f·k_d[I] = 2k_t[M•]², giving [M•] = (f·k_d[I]/k_t)^½. Then

Rp = k_p[M]·(f·k_d[I]/k_t)^½
(the long-chain approximation: monomer is consumed only in propagation)

Rp is first order in monomer and half order in initiator; doubling [I] raises Rp by only √2, the half-order being the signature of bimolecular termination. The overall activation energy is E = E_p + ½(E_d − E_t); since E_d is large (about 120–150 kJ/mol), rate rises steeply with temperature while Xn falls.

⚠️ Doubling the initiator
Rp ∝ [I]^½ but ν (and so Xn) ∝ [I]^−½. Doubling the initiator speeds the reaction by 1.41× and shortens the chains by the same factor. Rate and molecular weight pull in opposite directions; only temperature-controlled or controlled/living methods break this trade-off.

3. Kinetic chain length, chain transfer and the Mayo equation

The kinetic chain length ν is the average number of monomer units added per radical generated: ν = Rp/Ri = Rp/Rt = k_p[M]/(2(f·k_d·k_t[I])^½). With no transfer, Xn = 2ν if termination is entirely by combination (each chain carries two initiator fragments) and Xn = ν if by disproportionation. Numerical sense: Rp = 1.0×10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ and Ri = 2.0×10⁻⁷ mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ give ν = 500, so Xn = 1000 (combination) or 500 (disproportionation).

Chain transfer (to monomer, solvent S, initiator, polymer or a deliberate transfer agent) kills one chain but passes the radical on, so the rate is unchanged while chains shorten. The Mayo equation is 1/Xn = 1/Xn,0 + C_M + C_S[S]/[M] + C_I[I]/[M], where Xn,0 is the value without transfer and each C = k_tr/k_p. A Mayo plot of 1/Xn against [S]/[M] is a straight line of slope C_S. Mercaptans (C_S large) are used as molecular-weight regulators. Transfer to polymer makes branches (LDPE short- and long-chain branching).

🎯 Autoacceleration (gel or Trommsdorff effect)
In bulk polymerization viscosity rises, big radicals diffuse slowly, so k_t drops sharply while small monomer still reaches chain ends (k_p barely changes). Radical concentration and Rp surge and heat release can run away. The effect is why steady-state kinetics holds only at low conversion.

Ionic and coordination polymerization (outline). Cationic: electron-donating substituents stabilise the carbocation (isobutylene, vinyl ethers) with Lewis acid plus co-initiator (BF₃/H₂O), at low temperature, termination by transfer. Anionic: electron-withdrawing groups stabilise the carbanion (styrene, acrylonitrile, dienes) with initiators such as n-butyllithium; in a pure system there is no termination (living), so Xn = [M]₀/[I]₀ at full conversion, chains stay active, and block copolymers follow by sequential monomer addition. Coordination (Ziegler–Natta): heterogeneous TiCl₃/TiCl₄ with an aluminium alkyl gives stereoregular isotactic polypropylene and linear polyethylene by insertion of the monomer at the transition-metal–carbon bond (Cossee–Arlman picture).

4. Step-growth polymerization and the Carothers equation

In step-growth, monomers first form dimers, trimers and so on; any two species can react, and high polymer appears only at very high conversion. Let p be the extent of reaction (fraction of the functional groups, of the limiting type, that have reacted). For an equimolar AA + BB or an A–B system, with N₀ initial molecules and N present at p, Xn = N₀/N, and since N = N₀(1 − p):

Xn = 1/(1 − p)
(Carothers equation, equimolar). p = 0.90 → Xn = 10; p = 0.98 → 50; p = 0.99 → 100; p = 0.999 → 1000.

For a polyester with mean structural-unit mass M₀ = 113 g/mol reacted to p = 0.99, Xn = 100 and Mn = 100 × 113 = 11,300 g/mol (ignoring end groups). Reaching Mn of useful engineering polymers therefore needs p above 0.99, which in turn demands purity, no side reactions and removal of the by-product (water, or methanol in ester interchange) to drive the equilibrium.

Stoichiometric imbalance. With r = N_A/N_B ≤ 1 (ratio of the numbers of A and B groups, A being deficient), Xn = (1 + r)/(1 + r − 2rp). At p → 1, Xn = (1 + r)/(1 − r): for r = 0.98, Xn = 1.98/0.02 = 99, so a 2% excess of one monomer caps the chain length near 100 however long the reaction runs. A deliberate trace of monofunctional reagent likewise controls Mn and stabilises it against later chain growth.

⚠️ Which p, which r
Use the limiting group for p and put the deficient group in the numerator of r. Taking r > 1 or taking p as conversion of the excess monomer gives wrong values. When monomers are mixed with unequal amounts of A and B, Xn is still finite at p = 1.

Network formation. For monomers of average functionality f_avg > 2, Carothers predicts gelation at p_c = 2/f_avg (an overestimate, since the true gel point, from Flory’s statistical theory, comes earlier). Glycerol (f = 3) with phthalic anhydride (f = 2) in the stoichiometric 2:3 ratio has f_avg = (2×3 + 3×2)/(2 + 3) = 2.4 and p_c = 0.833.

5. Step-growth kinetics and the distribution of chain lengths

Esterification is acid-catalysed. For equimolar groups with concentration C = C₀(1 − p) of each, the rate of loss is −dC/dt = k[COOH][OH][catalyst]. Externally catalysed (strong acid added, constant): −dC/dt = k′C², giving 1/C = 1/C₀ + k′t, so Xn = 1 + k′C₀t, linear in time. Self-catalysed (the diacid is the catalyst): −dC/dt = kC³, giving Xn² = 1 + 2kC₀²t, so Xn grows only as t^½ and the uncatalysed reaction is very slow. Plots of 1/(1 − p) against t (catalysed) or 1/(1 − p)² against t (self-catalysed) are straight lines.

Flory most-probable distribution. The probability that a given group has reacted is p, so the number fraction of x-mers is N_x/N = (1 − p)p^(x−1), and the weight fraction is w_x = x(1 − p)²p^(x−1). The averages are Xn = 1/(1 − p), Xw = (1 + p)/(1 − p), so the dispersity Xw/Xn = 1 + p → 2 at high conversion. This value of 2 is a hallmark of linear step-growth polymers formed at equilibrium.

Chain-growth versus step-growth, side by side
FeatureChain-growth (radical)Step-growth
Active centresOnly growing chain endsAny functional group
Monomer left at high MnPlenty; monomer and polymer coexistAlmost none; monomer gone early
Mn versus conversionHigh at once, nearly constantRises slowly, huge only as p → 1
Long reaction timeRaises yield, not MnRaises Mn
💡 Dance floor versus queue
Chain-growth is a few people on a platform each pulling in newcomers one at a time; step-growth is a crowded floor where any pair or group can join hands, and big groups form only once nearly everyone has found a partner.

6. Metallocene catalysts and newer (controlled/living) methods

Metallocene catalysts are sandwich complexes of a group-4 metal (Zr, Ti, Hf) between cyclopentadienyl-type rings, activated by a co-catalyst, methylaluminoxane (MAO) (Kaminsky). Because every metal centre is chemically the same (single-site), the polymer has narrow molecular-weight distribution (dispersity near 2, against 4–10 for multi-site Ziegler–Natta), uniform comonomer incorporation (so linear low-density polyethylene with controlled short branching), and tacticity set by the ligand symmetry: bridged (ansa) C₂-symmetric complexes give isotactic and Cs-symmetric ones give syndiotactic polypropylene. Metallocene polyolefins are clearer and tougher at the same density.

Controlled/living radical polymerization keeps chains in a dormant state, with only a tiny fraction active at any moment, so termination is suppressed and all chains grow together. For an ideal living system Xn = [M]₀·p/[I]₀ (p = monomer conversion) and the dispersity approaches 1 + 1/Xn (Poisson). Example: [M]₀ = 2.0 M, [I]₀ = 0.020 M, p = 0.80 gives Xn = 2.0 × 0.80/0.020 = 80 and the chain length grows linearly with conversion, unlike conventional radical polymerization.

Newer methods in outline
MethodKey ideaTypical use
ATRPAlkyl halide initiator, Cu(I)/ligand reversibly abstracts halogen, giving radical and Cu(II)–halideBlock, star, graft architectures of styrenics and (meth)acrylates
RAFTThiocarbonylthio chain-transfer agent; degenerative transfer exchanges active and dormant chainsWide monomer range, no metal
Ring-opening (ROP)Strained ring opens: lactide, ε-caprolactone, cyclic ethers, lactamsPolylactide, polycaprolactone, nylon 6
Group-transfer (GTP)Silyl ketene acetal initiator transfers the silyl group to the incoming (meth)acrylate, nucleophilic catalystLiving acrylics at room temperature
ℹ️ Ceiling temperature
Propagation is exothermic but lowers entropy, so ΔG_p = ΔH_p − TΔS_p turns positive above the ceiling temperature T_c = ΔH_p/ΔS_p, where polymerization and depolymerization balance. Monomers with bulky 1,1-substituents (α-methylstyrene) have a low T_c, so they polymerize only in the cold.

Key takeaways

  • Xn counts structural units; Mn = Xn·M₀. Functionality above 2 on average leads to branching and gelation at p_c = 2/f_avg (Carothers).
  • Free-radical: Rp = k_p[M](f·k_d[I]/k_t)^½, ν = Rp/Ri; Xn = 2ν for combination, ν for disproportionation; Rp ∝ [I]^½, Xn ∝ [I]^−½.
  • Mayo: 1/Xn = 1/Xn,0 + C_M + C_S[S]/[M]; transfer shortens chains without changing rate; the gel effect (low k_t) raises rate at high conversion.
  • Step-growth: Xn = 1/(1 − p), or (1 + r)/(1 + r − 2rp) with imbalance; high polymer needs p > 0.99; catalysed Xn = 1 + k′C₀t, self-catalysed Xn² = 1 + 2kC₀²t; Xw/Xn = 1 + p.
  • Anionic polymerization of clean systems is living (Xn = [M]₀/[I]₀); Ziegler–Natta is multi-site and broad, metallocene single-site and narrow with ligand-controlled tacticity.
  • ATRP, RAFT, ROP and GTP give predetermined Xn = [M]₀p/[I]₀, low dispersity and block architectures.

Practice questions (16)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Which of the following monomers has a functionality of three in condensation polymerization?

    1. Adipic acid
    2. Ethylene glycol
    3. Glycerol
    4. Hexamethylene diamine
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Glycerol

    Glycerol has three hydroxyl groups, so f = 3 and it gives branching or networks. Adipic acid, ethylene glycol and hexamethylene diamine each have two reactive groups (f = 2) and give linear chains.
  2. In a free-radical polymerization with bimolecular termination, the initiator concentration is doubled at constant temperature and monomer concentration, with no chain transfer. What happens?

    1. Rate rises by about 1.41 times and Xn falls by the same factor
    2. Rate doubles because initiation is first order, and Xn halves
    3. Rate rises by 1.41 times while Xn is unchanged, as transfer is absent
    4. Rate is unchanged but Xn halves, since termination is faster
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Rate rises by about 1.41 times and Xn falls by the same factor

    Rp ∝ [I]^½ and ν ∝ [I]^−½, so both change by √2 in opposite directions. Rate doubling would need first-order dependence on [I], which is what the tempting alternative assumes; it ignores that termination is second order in radicals.
  3. In an equimolar step-growth polymerization the extent of reaction is raised from p = 0.95 to p = 0.99. By what factor does the number-average degree of polymerization increase?

    1. Approximately 1.04 times
    2. 2 times
    3. 4 times
    4. 5 times
    Show answer

    Answer: D — 5 times

    Xn = 1/(1 − p): 1/0.05 = 20 and 1/0.01 = 100, a factor of 5. The tiny change in p hides a large change in chain length, which is why the last few percent of conversion matter; the 1.04 ratio of p values is the tempting error.
  4. n-Butyllithium initiates styrene in a rigorously dry, impurity-free hydrocarbon solvent. Which description is correct?

    1. Chains terminate by combination of two carbanions
    2. Chains stay active after the monomer is consumed, so a second monomer can add to form a block copolymer
    3. A Lewis acid co-initiator is required to generate the carbocation
    4. The propagating species is a free radical with Xn = 2ν
    Show answer

    Answer: B — Chains stay active after the monomer is consumed, so a second monomer can add to form a block copolymer

    Like-charged carbanion ends repel, and in a pure system no transfer or termination occurs, so the polymerization is living and block copolymers form by adding another monomer. Combination and Xn = 2ν belong to radical polymerization; a Lewis acid co-initiator belongs to cationic polymerization.
  5. A mercaptan is added to a free-radical polymerization of styrene as a chain-transfer agent with a large transfer constant. Compared with the run without it, the main effect is

    1. a much lower polymerization rate and unchanged chain length
    2. a higher Xn because every transfer event creates a new initiating radical
    3. lower Xn with the rate nearly unchanged
    4. a living polymerization with dispersity near 1
    Show answer

    Answer: C — lower Xn with the rate nearly unchanged

    Transfer ends one chain but starts another radical of similar reactivity, so rate stays nearly the same while 1/Xn increases by C_S[S]/[M] in the Mayo equation. Lower rate or a higher Xn would require the new radical to be inactive or the chains not to be cut.
  6. In bulk free-radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate, the rate rises sharply at moderate conversion although the initiator is being consumed. The correct explanation is that

    1. k_p rises because the growing radicals become more reactive in the viscous medium
    2. k_t falls as viscous growing chains diffuse slowly, while small monomer still reaches radical ends
    3. k_d increases because viscous medium gives a more efficient cage escape
    4. the mechanism shifts from chain-growth toward step-growth coupling of oligomers
    Show answer

    Answer: B — k_t falls as viscous growing chains diffuse slowly, while small monomer still reaches radical ends

    This is the gel (Trommsdorff) effect: diffusion-controlled termination slows, radical concentration climbs, and Rp = k_p[M][M•] surges. Monomer concentration actually falls, and viscosity does not make k_d larger; the mechanism stays chain-growth.
  7. The principal reason a single-site metallocene catalyst gives polyolefins with narrow molecular-weight distribution is that

    1. termination occurs only by combination of two growing chains, which fixes the chain length
    2. every active metal centre is chemically identical, so all chains grow under the same conditions
    3. the catalyst is a heterogeneous solid whose sites have a wide range of activities and stereoselectivities
    4. the co-catalyst methylaluminoxane terminates all chains at the same length
    Show answer

    Answer: B — every active metal centre is chemically identical, so all chains grow under the same conditions

    Identical sites give a single most-probable distribution with dispersity near 2, while heterogeneous multi-site Ziegler–Natta catalysts superpose several distributions and give a broad one. Methylaluminoxane activates the metal; it does not set chain length.
  8. Which pairing of a controlled-polymerization method with its characteristic feature is correct?

    1. ATRP: a Cu(I)/ligand complex reversibly abstracts a halogen atom from a dormant alkyl halide chain end
    2. RAFT: a copper catalyst and an alkyl halide initiator reversibly shuttle a halogen atom
    3. Group-transfer: a stable nitroxide radical reversibly caps the growing chain end
    4. Ring-opening: requires a carbon–carbon double bond in the monomer ring to open
    Show answer

    Answer: A — ATRP: a Cu(I)/ligand complex reversibly abstracts a halogen atom from a dormant alkyl halide chain end

    ATRP is built on the reversible Cu(I)/Cu(II) halogen exchange. RAFT uses a thiocarbonylthio transfer agent and no metal, nitroxide capping is the nitroxide-mediated method (not group-transfer), and ring-opening uses strained rings such as lactide or caprolactam, not C=C.
  9. For a linear polyester made by equimolar step-growth to extent of reaction p = 0.99, the ratio Xw/Xn from the Flory most-probable distribution (Xw = (1 + p)/(1 − p)) is closest to

    1. 1.00, since all chains have almost the same length
    2. 1.01, equal to 1/p
    3. 99, equal to Xn minus 1
    4. 1.99, equal to 1 + p
    Show answer

    Answer: D — 1.99, equal to 1 + p

    Xn = 1/(1 − p) = 100 and Xw = 1.99/0.01 = 199, so Xw/Xn = 1 + p = 1.99, the familiar value near 2. A high conversion does not narrow the distribution: both averages grow together.
  10. Which of the following statements about free-radical chain polymerization (steady state, bimolecular termination) are correct?
    P: High-Mn chains are formed from the very start of the reaction.
    Q: The rate of polymerization is proportional to the square root of the initiator concentration.
    R: Mn rises steadily and becomes large only as conversion approaches 100%.
    S: Chains grow only at the active end, so monomer and high polymer coexist throughout.

    1. P
    2. Q
    3. R
    4. S
    Show answer

    Answer: A — P; B — Q; D — S

    P, Q and S describe chain-growth: each chain is completed in about a second, Rp ∝ [I]^½, and unreacted monomer sits beside full-size polymer. R describes step-growth, where Xn = 1/(1 − p) is large only near full conversion.
  11. A polyamide is to be made by step-growth from a diacid and a diamine, with Xn of at least 100. Which of the following are required?
    P: Extent of reaction of the limiting group above 0.99.
    Q: A molar ratio of the two monomers within about 2% of unity.
    R: Efficient removal or control of the small-molecule by-product so the equilibrium is not limiting.
    S: A small intentional excess of a monofunctional acid to speed the growth.

    1. P
    2. Q
    3. R
    4. S
    Show answer

    Answer: A — P; B — Q; C — R

    Xn = 100 needs p ≥ 0.99 at exact stoichiometry (r = 1) and (1 + r)/(1 − r) ≥ 100 means r ≥ 0.98 even at p = 1. By-product removal pushes the equilibrium to high p. A monofunctional acid caps chains and lowers Xn; it never speeds growth.
  12. In a free-radical polymerization with no chain transfer, ν is the kinetic chain length (ν = Rp/Ri, with Ri = Rt). Which statements are correct?
    P: If termination is entirely by combination, Xn = 2ν.
    Q: If termination is entirely by disproportionation, Xn = ν.
    R: ν falls when the initiator concentration is raised, at fixed monomer concentration.
    S: ν is independent of monomer concentration.

    1. P
    2. Q
    3. R
    4. S
    Show answer

    Answer: A — P; B — Q; C — R

    Combination joins two kinetic chains in one molecule (Xn = 2ν), disproportionation leaves one molecule per kinetic chain (Xn = ν), and ν = k_p[M]/(2(f·k_d·k_t[I])^½) falls as [I]^−½. It is directly proportional to [M], so the claim of independence from [M] is wrong.
  13. A step-growth polymer is made from A–A and B–B monomers with a stoichiometric ratio r = N_A/N_B = 0.98 (B in 2% excess). The reaction is driven to complete conversion of the A groups (p = 1). Using Xn = (1 + r)/(1 + r − 2rp), calculate the number-average degree of polymerization. Give the answer as an integer.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 99

    At p = 1: Xn = (1 + 0.98)/(1 + 0.98 − 2 × 0.98) = 1.98/0.02 = 99. A 2% imbalance caps Xn near 100.
  14. An equimolar diacid and diol are polymerized to extent of reaction p = 0.99. The mean mass of a structural unit is M₀ = 113 g/mol; neglect end groups. Using Xn = 1/(1 − p), calculate Mn in g/mol. Give the answer as an integer.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 11300

    Xn = 1/(1 − 0.99) = 100, so Mn = Xn·M₀ = 100 × 113 = 11,300 g/mol.
  15. In a free-radical polymerization with no chain transfer, the polymerization rate is Rp = 1.0×10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹ and the initiation rate is Ri = 2.0×10⁻⁷ mol L⁻¹ s⁻¹, with steady state (Ri = Rt). Termination is entirely by combination. Calculate Xn. Give the answer as an integer.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 1000

    ν = Rp/Ri = 1.0×10⁻⁴/2.0×10⁻⁷ = 500. Combination joins two kinetic chains, so Xn = 2ν = 1000.
  16. An ideal living polymerization starts with monomer [M]₀ = 2.0 mol/L and initiator [I]₀ = 0.020 mol/L, and every initiator molecule starts one chain with no termination or transfer. Using Xn = [M]₀p/[I]₀, calculate Xn at monomer conversion p = 0.80. Give the answer as an integer.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 80

    Xn = 2.0 × 0.80/0.020 = 80. In living polymerization Xn grows linearly with conversion.