Polymer Characterization II: Glass and Melting Transitions, Crystallinity, Orientation, Spectroscopic, Thermal and Microscopic Analysis

This chapter completes Section XE5.2 “Polymer Characterization” of XE5 Polymer Science and Engineering. It answers the second part of the heading: “Glass transition; Melting transition; Amorphous and crystalline states of polymers; Orientation in polymers and polymer crystallinity; Factors affecting crystallinity; Analysis of polymers using IR, XRD, thermal (DSC, DMTA, TGA); Microscopic (optical and electronic) techniques; Morphology and microstructure (SEM, TEM, AFM).” It teaches the nature of Tg and Tm and the factors that move them, amorphous and crystalline states and the factors favouring crystallinity, orientation, how crystallinity is measured from density, DSC enthalpy and XRD, what IR, XRD, DSC, DMTA and TGA each reveal, the microscopies (optical, SEM, TEM, AFM), and the spherulite–lamella morphology. The numericals are degree of crystallinity from density and from ΔH, the Fox equation for Tg and the Bragg equation for lattice spacing.

1. The glass transition and the factors that set Tg

On cooling, an amorphous polymer changes from a soft, rubbery or viscous state to a hard, brittle glass at the glass transition temperature Tg, when segmental motion of 10–50 backbone atoms freezes. It is a kinetic, second-order-like transition: the volume and enthalpy are continuous but their slopes change, so the thermal expansion coefficient and the heat capacity step up on heating through Tg (there is no latent heat), and the modulus drops by about three orders of magnitude. Tg depends on the cooling rate, being higher at faster rates, and on the measuring frequency; it is reported at a stated rate, and is not a thermodynamic constant.

Factors that raise or lower Tg
FactorEffect on TgReason and example
Chain stiffnessRaisesRings in the backbone, rotation hindered: aromatic polyesters, polyimides
Flexible links (–O–, –Si–O–)LowersEasy rotation: polydimethylsiloxane has a very low Tg (about −125 °C)
Bulky side groupRaisesHinders rotation: polystyrene (about 100 °C) versus polyethylene
Polar groups, hydrogen bondsRaisesStronger intermolecular forces: PVC above polypropylene
CrosslinkingRaisesRestricts segment motion: vulcanization, cured epoxy
Plasticiser, diluent, low MnLowersAdded free volume: plasticised PVC; chain ends add free volume

Two relations are standard. The Fox–Flory equation Tg = Tg∞ − K/Mn shows Tg rising with Mn and levelling off (K is a constant). The Fox equation for a miscible blend or random copolymer of weight fractions w₁, w₂ is 1/Tg = w₁/Tg,₁ + w₂/Tg,₂, with all temperatures in kelvin. Example: w₁ = 0.5 with Tg,₁ = 373 K and Tg,₂ = 223 K gives 1/Tg = 0.5/373 + 0.5/223 = 3.583×10⁻³ K⁻¹, so Tg = 279 K, less than the arithmetic mean of 298 K.

⚠️ Tg is not a melting point
Tg is the property of the amorphous fraction only; a semicrystalline polymer shows both Tg (amorphous regions) and Tm (crystals). Crystals do not have a Tg, and an amorphous polymer has no Tm. Use kelvin in the Fox equation and remember the rate dependence when comparing literature values.

2. The melting transition and the factors that set Tm

Melting of the crystalline regions is a first-order thermodynamic transition with latent heat ΔH_m and, because crystals are of different sizes and perfection, a broad melting range, quoted as the peak of the DSC endotherm. At equilibrium Tm⁰ = ΔH_m/ΔS_m: a high Tm needs a large enthalpy of fusion (strong intermolecular forces such as hydrogen bonding) or a small entropy of fusion (a stiff chain that loses little conformational freedom on melting). Thus nylon 66 (hydrogen bonds, about 265 °C) and polyethylene terephthalate (stiff aromatic ring, about 260 °C) melt high, while polyethylene (flexible, no polar groups, about 130–140 °C) and polypropylene (about 165 °C for the isotactic grade) melt lower.

Further factors on Tm: symmetry and regularity raise it; lamellar thickness, since thin or imperfect crystals melt lower (Gibbs–Thomson: Tm = Tm⁰[1 − 2σ_e/(ΔH_u ρ_c l)], where l is the lamellar thickness and σ_e the fold-surface energy), so annealing raises Tm and fast cooling gives a lower, broader peak; copolymerization with a second unit or branching (LDPE against HDPE) lowers Tm; plasticisers lower it; and molar mass raises Tm only at low Mn. A rough rule due to Boyer and Beaman is Tg/Tm ≈ ½ (in kelvin) for symmetric polymers and about ⅔ for unsymmetrical ones.

Tg and Tm compared
PropertyGlass transitionMelting
Phase involvedAmorphousCrystalline
Thermodynamic orderKinetic, second-order-likeFirst-order
DSC signalStep in heat capacityEndothermic peak, area = ΔH_m
Depends on cooling rateYes, stronglyThrough crystal size and perfection

3. Amorphous and crystalline states, and what favours crystallinity

A polymer cannot crystallise completely, because chains are long, entangled and of different length; the usual picture is a two-phase model of crystalline lamellae embedded in an amorphous matrix, the degree of crystallinity being the fraction of crystalline material (typically 10–80%). Crystalline regions give stiffness, strength, density, opacity (light scattering at crystal–amorphous boundaries) and solvent resistance; amorphous regions give toughness above Tg, transparency, and permeability. The glass transition of the amorphous part is retained in semicrystalline polymers.

Factors favouring crystallinity: (i) regular structure, with stereoregular isotactic or syndiotactic chains (atactic polystyrene, atactic polypropylene stay amorphous); (ii) symmetry, as in polyethylene or PTFE; (iii) small, regular side groups and the absence of bulky ones; (iv) strong intermolecular forces (hydrogen bonding in polyamides lock chains in register); (v) chain flexibility enough to fold and pack, but not so much as to resist ordering (stiff chains crystallise slowly); (vi) slow cooling or annealing that allows time to organise, and temperature between Tg and Tm; (vii) orientation and strain, which promote crystallisation. Hindering factors are random copolymerization, branching, crosslinking, bulky or irregular substituents, and fast quenching (quenched PET is clear and amorphous).

Morphology. From the melt or concentrated solution, polymers form spherulites: spherical aggregates, 1–100 μm across, in which radial ribbon-like lamellae, about 10–20 nm thick, grow outward from a nucleus, with chains running roughly perpendicular to the lamella plane and folding back at its faces; amorphous material and tie molecules lie between lamellae and hold the structure together. Fewer nuclei (slow cooling) give large spherulites and a brittle, hazy product; nucleating agents or fast cooling give many small spherulites with better clarity and toughness. From dilute solution, polymers grow thin single-crystal lamellae; under flow or stress, row structures and fibrillar crystals (shish-kebab) form.

ℹ️ Spherulites under crossed polars
Because the lamellae are radial and optically anisotropic, a spherulite between crossed polarisers shows a dark Maltese-cross pattern; the arms lie along the polariser and analyser directions. This is the standard optical-microscope evidence of spherulitic morphology.

4. Measuring crystallinity; orientation in polymers

Density method. With ρ the sample density, ρ_c that of the 100% crystalline phase and ρ_a that of the amorphous phase (additive volumes), the volume fraction crystallinity is X_v = (ρ − ρ_a)/(ρ_c − ρ_a) and the mass fraction is X_w = ρ_c(ρ − ρ_a)/[ρ(ρ_c − ρ_a)]. Example: ρ = 0.950 g/cm³ with ρ_c = 1.000 and ρ_a = 0.855 g/cm³ gives X_v = 0.095/0.145 = 0.655 and X_w = 0.655 × 1.000/0.950 = 0.690. Always read which of the two fractions is asked: mass and volume fractions differ because the crystal is denser.

DSC method. The mass-fraction crystallinity is X_c = (ΔH_m − ΔH_cc)/(ΔH_m⁰ · w_p), with ΔH_m the measured enthalpy of fusion (J/g, from the peak area), ΔH_cc any cold-crystallisation exotherm during heating, ΔH_m⁰ the enthalpy of fusion of the 100% crystalline polymer (a literature value, to be given), and w_p the polymer mass fraction in a filled sample. Example: ΔH_m = 100 J/g and ΔH_m⁰ = 290 J/g, with no cold crystallisation, give X_c = 0.345. XRD gives crystallinity from the ratio of crystalline peak area to total scattered area (peaks plus amorphous halo), and the different methods agree only roughly since each defines crystallinity differently.

Orientation. Drawing a polymer above Tg (cold drawing, fibre spinning, film stretching) aligns chains along the draw direction. The sample becomes anisotropic: modulus and strength rise strongly along the axis (a gel-spun high-molar-mass polyethylene fibre approaches the theoretical chain stiffness) and fall transversely, with optical birefringence Δn that measures orientation. The Hermans orientation function f = (3⟨cos²θ⟩ − 1)/2 equals 1 for perfect alignment, 0 for random and −½ for perpendicular alignment. Orientation, via strain-induced crystallisation, also raises crystallinity, and the oriented, crystallised chains shrink back on heating above Tg if not heat-set, the principle of heat-shrink films.

5. Analysis by IR, XRD and thermal methods (DSC, DMTA, TGA)

What each method reveals
MethodMeasuresInformation for polymers
IR (FTIR, ATR)Absorption of IR by vibrations that change the dipole momentFunctional groups, composition, end groups, oxidation (carbonyl growth), tacticity and crystallinity-sensitive bands
XRD (WAXD, SAXS)Diffraction of X-rays by ordered planesCrystal structure, d-spacing, crystallinity, crystallite size, orientation; SAXS gives the lamellar long period
DSCHeat flow against temperature at a fixed rateTg (step), Tc (exotherm), Tm (endotherm), ΔH_m and crystallinity, cure exotherm and degree of cure
DMTA (DMA)Storage modulus E′, loss modulus E″, tan δ = E″/E′ under oscillating strain against TTg (tan δ or E″ peak, more sensitive than DSC), secondary relaxations, crosslink density from rubbery plateau, blend miscibility
TGAMass against temperature or time in N₂ or airThermal stability, onset of degradation, moisture and volatiles, filler and ash content, composition of blends

IR practice. A broad band near 3200–3600 cm⁻¹ is O–H or N–H stretching, a strong band near 1700–1740 cm⁻¹ is the carbonyl stretch (an ester near 1735 cm⁻¹; growth of a carbonyl band in polyethylene signals oxidation), and a sharp band near 2240 cm⁻¹ is the nitrile C≡N of polyacrylonitrile. Beer–Lambert behaviour, A = εcl, allows quantitation. Symmetric vibrations without a dipole change, such as the C=C of an ethylene-like backbone, are weak in IR and strong in Raman.

XRD practice. The Bragg condition is nλ = 2d sinθ, where θ is half the measured scattering angle 2θ. With Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm), a peak at 2θ = 20° corresponds to d = 0.1542/(2 sin 10°) = 0.444 nm. Crystalline polymers give sharp peaks on a broad amorphous halo; the width gives the crystallite size by the Scherrer equation L = Kλ/(β cosθ) (K ≈ 0.9, β the peak width in radians). Wide-angle scattering reflects atomic spacings of about 0.1–1 nm, while small-angle scattering probes the lamellar repeat of 10–30 nm.

⚠️ Which DSC peak is which
On heating, in the convention where endotherms point down (state it in the answer), Tg is a baseline step, cold crystallisation an exotherm above Tg (only in quenched samples that can still crystallise), and melting an endotherm. Quote ΔH_m from the peak area and subtract the cold-crystallisation exotherm when computing the original crystallinity.

6. Microscopy: optical, SEM, TEM and AFM

Microscopic techniques compared
TechniqueProbe and principleResolution and useSample preparation
Optical (polarised, phase contrast, hot stage)Visible light, transmitted or reflectedAbout 0.2 μm limit; spherulites, Maltese cross, crystallisation in situThin film or microtomed section
SEMScanned electron beam; secondary electrons form imagenm scale, large depth of field; surface topography, fracture surfaces, blend and filler dispersionConductive coating (gold or carbon) of insulating polymers, vacuum
TEMElectron beam transmitted through an ultrathin sampleHighest resolution (sub-nm to nm); internal structure, lamellae, block copolymer domains, particle size in latexUltramicrotomy to 50–100 nm; staining of one phase (OsO₄ for unsaturated rubber, RuO₄)
AFMSharp tip on a cantilever scans the surface; deflection from forcesnm lateral, sub-nm vertical; 3D topography, phase imaging of stiffness, lamellae, nanomechanicsLittle preparation; no coating or vacuum needed

Contrast is the central problem in polymers because they are made of light elements. TEM obtains it by staining (heavy-metal oxides bind to C=C or to one phase), SEM by differences in topography or by etching one phase, optical microscopy by birefringence under crossed polarisers or phase contrast, and AFM by tip–sample stiffness and adhesion in tapping-mode phase images. Electron beams damage soft polymers, so doses are kept low or the sample is cooled.

Choosing a tool. Spherulite size and growth rate on a hot stage: polarised optical microscopy. Dispersion of rubber particles in a toughened plastic, or the domain structure of a block copolymer: TEM with staining. Fracture surface and filler distribution: SEM. Surface roughness and lamellar structure on an uncoated film in air: AFM. Each of these gives morphology (how the phases and crystals are arranged in space), unlike DSC or XRD, which give averages over the sample.

Key takeaways

  • Tg is a kinetic, second-order-like step in heat capacity of the amorphous phase, raised by stiffness, bulky or polar groups and crosslinks, lowered by plasticiser; Fox: 1/Tg = Σw_i/Tg,i (kelvin).
  • Tm is first-order, Tm⁰ = ΔH_m/ΔS_m; stiff chains, hydrogen bonds and regularity raise it, while thin lamellae, copolymer units and branches lower it; Tg/Tm ≈ ½ to ⅔.
  • Crystallinity is favoured by regularity, symmetry, small side groups, hydrogen bonding, slow cooling and orientation; X_v = (ρ − ρ_a)/(ρ_c − ρ_a), X_w = (ρ_c/ρ)X_v, X_c = ΔH_m/ΔH_m⁰ from DSC.
  • Orientation aligns chains, raises axial modulus and strength and gives birefringence; the Hermans function is 1 (aligned), 0 (random), −½ (perpendicular).
  • IR identifies functional groups, XRD (Bragg nλ = 2d sinθ) gives crystal structure and crystallinity, DSC gives Tg, Tm, ΔH, DMTA gives E′, E″, tan δ and sensitive Tg, TGA gives stability and composition.
  • Spherulites (1–100 μm, radial lamellae of 10–20 nm with chain folding) are seen by polarised optical microscopy; SEM images surfaces, TEM internal structure with staining, AFM topography and stiffness without coating.

Practice questions (16)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Which statement correctly describes the glass transition of an amorphous polymer on heating?

    1. It is a first-order transition with a latent heat equal to the enthalpy of fusion
    2. It is a step in heat capacity with no latent heat and shifts with rate
    3. It occurs at the same temperature for every cooling rate because it is a thermodynamic constant
    4. It is the temperature at which the crystalline lamellae melt
    Show answer

    Answer: B — It is a step in heat capacity with no latent heat and shifts with rate

    Tg is a kinetic, second-order-like change: volume and enthalpy are continuous but heat capacity and expansion coefficient step up, and faster rates give higher Tg. Latent heat and a fixed value belong to a first-order transition such as melting.
  2. Which change is expected to raise the glass transition temperature of a given amorphous polymer?

    1. Adding a small-molecule plasticiser that increases the free volume
    2. Introducing flexible ether links into the backbone to ease rotation
    3. Light crosslinking that restricts the motion of chain segments
    4. Lowering the number-average molar mass of a low-Mn sample further
    Show answer

    Answer: C — Light crosslinking that restricts the motion of chain segments

    Crosslinks limit segmental motion and so raise Tg. Plasticisers and chain ends add free volume, and flexible links ease rotation, all of which lower Tg.
  3. Nylon 66 melts near 265 °C while polyethylene melts near 135 °C. The main reason is that nylon 66 has

    1. a much higher molar mass in commercial grades, which raises Tm strongly
    2. a lower degree of crystallinity, which stabilises the melt and delays melting
    3. a more flexible backbone, which raises the entropy of fusion and the melting point
    4. hydrogen bonds between amide groups, which raise the enthalpy of fusion
    Show answer

    Answer: D — hydrogen bonds between amide groups, which raise the enthalpy of fusion

    Tm⁰ = ΔH_m/ΔS_m: hydrogen bonding raises the enthalpy that has to be supplied to melt. A flexible backbone would raise ΔS_m and lower Tm, and molar mass above a modest value barely changes Tm.
  4. A sample of isotactic polypropylene is annealed for several hours at a temperature between its Tg and Tm. Compared with the quenched sample, the annealed one will show

    1. a lower melting peak and lower crystallinity because the chains relax
    2. a higher melting peak and higher crystallinity as lamellae thicken and perfect
    3. an unchanged melting peak but a higher glass transition temperature
    4. conversion to an amorphous glass because it was held above Tg
    Show answer

    Answer: B — a higher melting peak and higher crystallinity as lamellae thicken and perfect

    Annealing gives chains time to organise: lamellae thicken and defects heal, so by the Gibbs–Thomson relation Tm rises, and crystallinity increases. Holding above Tg but below Tm promotes crystallisation; it does not make the polymer amorphous.
  5. Which of the following polymers, made by conventional free-radical or stereo-irregular routes, is expected to be essentially amorphous?

    1. Atactic polystyrene, with random phenyl placement along the chain
    2. High-density polyethylene, with linear and symmetric chains that pack easily
    3. Polytetrafluoroethylene, with a regular, symmetric backbone of fluorinated carbons
    4. Nylon 66, with hydrogen-bonded chains held in register with one another
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Atactic polystyrene, with random phenyl placement along the chain

    Random stereochemistry of the bulky phenyl groups prevents regular packing, so atactic polystyrene is amorphous. Linear symmetric polyethylene and PTFE and hydrogen-bonded nylon 66 pack into crystals readily.
  6. A quenched PET sample is heated in a DSC. It shows a melting endotherm of ΔH_m = 40 J/g and a cold-crystallisation exotherm of ΔH_cc = 36 J/g during the same scan. With ΔH_m⁰ = 140 J/g for 100% crystalline PET, the degree of crystallinity of the sample before heating was about

    1. 29%, from ΔH_m/ΔH_m⁰
    2. 54%, from (ΔH_m + ΔH_cc)/ΔH_m⁰
    3. 26%, from ΔH_cc/ΔH_m⁰
    4. 3%, from (ΔH_m − ΔH_cc)/ΔH_m⁰
    Show answer

    Answer: D — 3%, from (ΔH_m − ΔH_cc)/ΔH_m⁰

    Crystals formed on heating (the cold-crystallisation exotherm) were not present originally, so X_c = (40 − 36)/140 = 0.029, about 3%. Using ΔH_m alone, 29%, would credit the sample with crystals that formed during the scan.
  7. The X-ray diffraction pattern of a polymer film shows only a single broad halo and no sharp peaks. This indicates that the film is

    1. highly crystalline, with very large crystallites and long-range order
    2. highly oriented along the film axis, with aligned crystallites
    3. amorphous, having only short-range order
    4. a perfect single crystal of the polymer, grown from solution
    Show answer

    Answer: C — amorphous, having only short-range order

    Sharp Bragg peaks need long-range periodic order. A broad halo arises from the average neighbour spacing in a disordered state. Very large crystallites would give narrower, not broader, peaks, and a single crystal gives spots or sharp reflections.
  8. A thin section of a styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer is exposed to osmium tetroxide vapour and imaged by TEM. Which domains appear dark?

    1. The polystyrene domains, because OsO₄ reacts with the aromatic rings
    2. The polybutadiene domains, because OsO₄ adds to the C=C bonds and deposits heavy osmium
    3. Both domains equally, because osmium is heavy
    4. Neither, because TEM cannot image polymers
    Show answer

    Answer: B — The polybutadiene domains, because OsO₄ adds to the C=C bonds and deposits heavy osmium

    OsO₄ stains unsaturated rubber through reaction at C=C, putting heavy atoms in the polybutadiene phase, which then scatters electrons more and appears dark; saturated polystyrene is unstained and appears light. The staining is selective, not equal for both phases.
  9. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of a filled polymer in air up to 700 °C leaves a residue. This residue is usually interpreted as

    1. the crystalline fraction of the polymer, which resists burning
    2. the inorganic filler content (ash) that does not volatilise
    3. the amount of moisture absorbed by the polymer from the air
    4. the molar mass of the polymer, from the temperature of full burn-off
    Show answer

    Answer: B — the inorganic filler content (ash) that does not volatilise

    TGA records mass against temperature; the organic polymer burns off in air and an inorganic filler such as glass or silica remains as residue. Moisture leaves at low temperature, and neither crystallinity nor molar mass is read from mass loss.
  10. Which of the following changes raise the glass transition temperature of an amorphous polymer?
    P: Crosslinking the chains
    Q: Adding a plasticiser
    R: Replacing a methylene side group by a bulky rigid phenyl group
    S: Making the backbone more flexible by adding –O– links

    1. P
    2. Q
    3. R
    4. S
    Show answer

    Answer: A — P; C — R

    Crosslinks and bulky rigid side groups hinder segmental rotation and raise Tg. A plasticiser adds free volume and a more flexible backbone eases rotation, so both lower Tg.
  11. Which of the following statements about thermal analysis are correct?
    P: A tan δ peak from DMTA can be used to locate Tg, often with higher sensitivity than the DSC heat-capacity step.
    Q: DSC measures the storage modulus of the sample directly.
    R: TGA measures the heat flow into the sample.
    S: In DMTA tan δ is the ratio of the loss modulus to the storage modulus.

    1. P
    2. Q
    3. R
    4. S
    Show answer

    Answer: A — P; D — S

    DMTA gives E′, E″ and tan δ = E″/E′, with a strong tan δ peak at the glass transition. DSC measures heat flow and TGA measures mass, so attributing storage modulus to DSC and heat flow to TGA reverses the techniques.
  12. Which of the following statements about the microscopy of polymers are correct?
    P: Insulating polymer samples usually need a thin conductive coating for conventional SEM.
    Q: AFM requires a high vacuum and a metal coating of the sample.
    R: TEM requires ultrathin sections of the sample, typically below about 100 nm.
    S: Spherulites show a Maltese-cross pattern between crossed polarisers in an optical microscope.

    1. P
    2. Q
    3. R
    4. S
    Show answer

    Answer: A — P; C — R; D — S

    Charging of insulators in SEM is avoided by gold or carbon coating, TEM needs thin sections for electron transmission, and the radial anisotropic lamellae of spherulites give the Maltese cross. AFM works in air on uncoated samples, so the statement requiring vacuum and coating is wrong.
  13. A polyethylene sample has density ρ = 0.940 g/cm³. Take the density of the 100% crystalline phase as ρ_c = 1.000 g/cm³ and of the amorphous phase as ρ_a = 0.855 g/cm³, with additive volumes. Using X_v = (ρ − ρ_a)/(ρ_c − ρ_a) and X_w = ρ_c(ρ − ρ_a)/[ρ(ρ_c − ρ_a)], calculate the mass-fraction crystallinity X_w, to three decimal places.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 0.624

    X_v = (0.940 − 0.855)/(1.000 − 0.855) = 0.085/0.145 = 0.5862. X_w = X_v × ρ_c/ρ = 0.5862 × 1.000/0.940 = 0.6236, i.e. 0.624.
  14. A polyethylene sample shows a DSC melting endotherm of ΔH_m = 150 J/g, with no cold crystallisation and no filler. Take ΔH_m⁰ = 290 J/g for 100% crystalline polyethylene. Using X_c = ΔH_m/ΔH_m⁰, calculate the percentage crystallinity (mass basis), to one decimal place.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 51.7

    X_c = 150/290 = 0.5172, i.e. 51.7% by mass.
  15. A random copolymer contains 70% by weight of unit 1 (homopolymer Tg = 373 K) and 30% by weight of unit 2 (homopolymer Tg = 223 K). Using the Fox equation 1/Tg = w₁/Tg,₁ + w₂/Tg,₂, calculate the copolymer Tg in kelvin, to one decimal place.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 310.4

    1/Tg = 0.7/373 + 0.3/223 = 1.8767×10⁻³ + 1.3453×10⁻³ = 3.2220×10⁻³ K⁻¹, so Tg = 310.4 K.
  16. An X-ray diffraction peak of a semicrystalline polymer is observed at a scattering angle 2θ = 21.5° using Cu Kα radiation of wavelength λ = 0.1542 nm. Using the Bragg equation nλ = 2d sinθ with n = 1, calculate the lattice spacing d in nm, to three decimal places.

    Numerical answer — type the value.

    Show answer

    Answer: 0.413

    θ = 10.75°, sin θ = 0.18650, so d = λ/(2 sinθ) = 0.1542/(2 × 0.18650) = 0.4134 nm, i.e. 0.413 nm. A common slip is to use 2θ = 21.5° directly in the sine.